Yet another website that finally "gets it."

thats is a very old article :P 

"thats is a very old article :P "

You can explain all the flaws of "out of ten" ratings, but some gamers still will still argue why they think it's a good system.

Gamesradar isn't too bad, they have good articles, I just find the layout of their articles to be too narrow and ads take up far too much space in their pages. Occasionally they have some bad articles too, but every journalist site has those once and a while.

"ZombieHunter said:

"thats is a very old article :P "

i know, but listening to the first community podcast reminded me of the article."

i like GamesRadar.  They have a lot of cool features and lists.  I agree with you that it is a good website, and I am starting to visit it more often.

They have an....hmmm.....interesting....podcast. Try to imagine the bombcast, but the staff is drunk and have access to every sound effect ever.

I like the 5 star system, I just feel you get more info form the 1-10 rating. But if you read the review it doesn't matter at all. But a lot of people don't read reviews. 

Gamesradar has good features occasionally, but they're hit-and-miss.

7/10 week was exceptionally good.

I don't think I've ever actually visited Gamesradar...guess there's a first time for everything.

I don't get what the big deal is. Anyone who is influenced by review scores is a jerk anyway.

There was a big scary spider in that article. I officially hate that site

"There was a big scary spider in that article. I officially hate that site"

People say they support things like this but they still get all butt hurt when some game they're hyping gets a bad rating on another site.