You all agree with Rush Limbaugh on this issue! Really, you do!

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for bones8677
Bones8677

3539

Forum Posts

567

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 11

#51  Edited By Bones8677
@Undeadpool said:
" @Dalai: I agree with his point, but he loses me the moment he blames the Democrats for wanting a bill that was put forth by a Republican governor about an issue that Republicans traditionally favor (censorship of art). "
There's a lot of Democrats that are for censoring video games too. Hillary Clinton for one. >_> And Obama isn't a big fan of them either.
Avatar image for coombs
Coombs

3509

Forum Posts

587

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#52  Edited By Coombs

Rush is a douche, 
 
But on the few issues you agree with him on, It's nice to have a loudmouth douchebag screaming at people for you

Avatar image for jjweatherman
JJWeatherman

15144

Forum Posts

5249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 18

#53  Edited By JJWeatherman

I'll let the government butt in all they want if I can do it to spite Rush Limbaugh.

Avatar image for randominternetuser
RandomInternetUser

6805

Forum Posts

769

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Queue Neo.
 

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for turbo_toaster
turbo_toaster

1056

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#55  Edited By turbo_toaster

Republicans have been just as willing to infringe on free speech and freedoms in general (ie. Patriot Act). 

Avatar image for gregariousgreg
GregariousGreg

339

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#56  Edited By GregariousGreg

But he still manages to blame democrats and liberals in something unrelated.

Avatar image for sweep
sweep

10886

Forum Posts

3660

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

#57  Edited By sweep  Moderator

This makes me miss Liberty City radio. Maybe I should boot up GTA4 and go for a drive...

Avatar image for ch13696
ch13696

4760

Forum Posts

204

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

#58  Edited By ch13696
@jim_dandy said:
"   
"
No not that Rush. This Rush... 
 

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for muffinmcmuffin
muffinmcmuffin

24

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59  Edited By muffinmcmuffin

lols @ gamers talking politics and law. just lols.

Avatar image for undeadpool
Undeadpool

8417

Forum Posts

10761

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 18

#60  Edited By Undeadpool
@Bones8677 said:
" @Undeadpool said:
" @Dalai: I agree with his point, but he loses me the moment he blames the Democrats for wanting a bill that was put forth by a Republican governor about an issue that Republicans traditionally favor (censorship of art). "
There's a lot of Democrats that are for censoring video games too. Hillary Clinton for one. >_> And Obama isn't a big fan of them either. "
This is true, as has Tipper Gore, but Jack Thompson was a Repub and generally when you see people censoring art, it's on the right wing. But in this case, it's a weirdly multi-lateral issue that has us blocked in from both sides. Anyway, Rush might be a hate-mongering, hypocritical, asshole, but even a stoppled clock is right twice a day.
Avatar image for theht
TheHT

15998

Forum Posts

1562

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#61  Edited By TheHT

Actually, Rush Limbaugh agrees with me.

Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By ryanwho
@damnboyadvance said:
" Wow, most of the community is actually cool with Rush in this thread. Everybody else just thinks it is a political move, or PR, and still hates his guts just because his political views are different than theirs.  And somehow, we have people talking about racism here. "
So you know the motivations behind why people don't like him? Someone in my family has Parkinsons so when Rush decided to make fun of a Parkinson's victim for "playing it up" I decided, peppered with his regular chauvinistic tendencies, media whoring, and pathetic drug habit, that he's a bad person. Where are the political views again? So maybe don't speak to why other people have the opinions they do, jackass.
Avatar image for ninjahunter
NinjaHunter

1005

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#63  Edited By NinjaHunter

Although he's right in his opinions on the matter he seems to have twisted it a bit to make it pro republican. Which is... weird.

Avatar image for ajamafalous
ajamafalous

13992

Forum Posts

905

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#64  Edited By ajamafalous
@ArbitraryWater said:
" He's right in saying that the market should determine what the market can produce, and that the government shouldn't mess with it. However, when he starts getting partisan he loses me. It's everyone's fault. "
Avatar image for theblindchessman
TheBlindChessman

250

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65  Edited By TheBlindChessman

Whoever made the comment about the broken clock being right twice a day is right.
 
According to Rush healthcare is about the government talking away your rights, instead of, you know, stopping you from dying.
 
It just so happens that in this case the government IS trying to take away your rights.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f00787182625
deactivated-5f00787182625

3325

Forum Posts

604

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Glenn Beck is pro Gay Marriage. It doesn't make him any less of an ass hat. Same goes for Limbaugh.

Avatar image for supermarius
Supermarius

1223

Forum Posts

821

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#67  Edited By Supermarius
@Dalai: Rush is trying to confuse his caller here.  Liberal progressives do not support censorship.  You have to remember how bad of a person Rush Limbaugh is.
Avatar image for tehflan
TehFlan

1954

Forum Posts

693

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 11

#68  Edited By TehFlan
@TheBlindChessman:
Well, government healthcare will take away a lot of people's rights. 
A friend of mine's uncle almost died while in Canada because their healthcare system was too messed to get him checked out. While the idea of the government making sure everyone in the country can recieve medical treatment sounds great, if the government goes about it like they go about everything else, it will be way less effecient, end up costing taxpayers more money than if people pay for their own medical insurance, and a lot of people won't be able to recieve the same treatment compared to the current system. It comes down to the government trying to control things they have no business in, much like this video game law.
Avatar image for dtat
dtat

1750

Forum Posts

546

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#69  Edited By dtat

He's right about free speech. He's wrong about who's to blame. Even when he's right about something he still finds a way to put it into pompous, hateful old man speech.

Avatar image for damnboyadvance
damnboyadvance

4216

Forum Posts

1020

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 4

#70  Edited By damnboyadvance
@ryanwho said:
" @damnboyadvance said:
" Wow, most of the community is actually cool with Rush in this thread. Everybody else just thinks it is a political move, or PR, and still hates his guts just because his political views are different than theirs.  And somehow, we have people talking about racism here. "
So you know the motivations behind why people don't like him? Someone in my family has Parkinsons so when Rush decided to make fun of a Parkinson's victim for "playing it up" I decided, peppered with his regular chauvinistic tendencies, media whoring, and pathetic drug habit, that he's a bad person. Where are the political views again? So maybe don't speak to why other people have the opinions they do, jackass. "

Well I'm sorry to hear that. I'm just trying to make a point that some people around here seem to aim hate at Republican leaders, or Republicans in general, and I can't understand why. It's just that a thread about Rush Limbaugh and his views on this issue suddenly turns into a republican hate forum, like any other thread involving politics on this site. Maybe he is a bad person, but do you think this is the thread to start discussing that?
Avatar image for jayzilla
Jayzilla

2709

Forum Posts

18

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#71  Edited By Jayzilla

Rush is a drug addict and likes videogames. he should be on a poster in most of your rooms.

Avatar image for seriouslynow
SeriouslyNow

8504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#72  Edited By SeriouslyNow
@TehFlan said:
" @TheBlindChessman: Well, government healthcare will take away a lot of people's rights. A friend of mine's uncle almost died while in Canada because their healthcare system was too messed to get him checked out. While the idea of the government making sure everyone in the country can recieve medical treatment sounds great, if the government goes about it like they go about everything else, it will be way less effecient, end up costing taxpayers more money than if people pay for their own medical insurance, and a lot of people won't be able to recieve the same treatment compared to the current system. It comes down to the government trying to control things they have no business in, much like this video game law. "
I don't think you understand how government managed healthcare works.  There's always an option of going outside the system if you can afford it.  Obviously your friend's uncle couldn't afford it and so he had to wait like many others who also lack the funds.  He waited, he was dealt with, he didn't die.  Without socialised healthcare he wouldn't have been dealt with at all. 
 
A fearmongering story where someone almost dies isn't really a valid reason to prevent universal healthcare from becoming a thing.  Someone almost dying is someone being saved.  Of course universal health costs taxpayers more money upfront than if they have to pay medical insurance without a safety net, it's funded from taxation.  What you're not seeing is that it can actually save taxpayers more money in the longterm as people won't have to get into massive debt and possibly declare bankruptcy to pay for expensive lifesaving medications and surgery which they couldn't otherwise afford.
Avatar image for afroman269
Afroman269

7440

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#73  Edited By Afroman269

A lot of pathetic people in here. O hey he is kewl for video games, I guess I can fully support him now. AMIRITE?!

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#74  Edited By Milkman

You win this round, Rush. I definitely don't like him now by any means but I think this may be the first time he's ever said something that I can agree with. 

Avatar image for dany
Dany

8019

Forum Posts

416

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#75  Edited By Dany

Oh, me and another person agree on one thing but disagree on many, many others. I respect him now.

Avatar image for mooseymcman
MooseyMcMan

12782

Forum Posts

5577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#76  Edited By MooseyMcMan  Online

While I guess I agree with Rush on this one thing, it doesn't stop the guy from being a bigoted asshole. 

Avatar image for sparks50
sparks50

381

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77  Edited By sparks50

I like the libertarian side of him, in the same way I like most republicans. Sadly, most of them only like libertarianism when it is to their direct advantage, as soon as there an immigrant, muslim or other who wants the same rights, they tend to forget their fine speeches about the constitution.

Avatar image for royalewifcheese
RoyaleWifCheese

595

Forum Posts

366

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#78  Edited By RoyaleWifCheese

Valid point that Rush seems to fully endorse freedom among video games, except notice the caller said "the Government."  
 
Go back and reread that, THEN go and listen to Limbaugh's show for no more than five minutes. Any time the word "government" is uttered, it is used derisively to mean the Obama administration. It doesn't matter that Schwarzenegger, a Republican, is one of the main combatants in this. As long as "the Government" is involved and stomping on a conservative's God-given right to free speech, than Rush is all for it. 
 
Rush doesn't "like" video games. He's all for it because "Barack the Magic Negro and his gang of Liberals" aren't. His words. I'm still not buying his bullshit.

Avatar image for tehflan
TehFlan

1954

Forum Posts

693

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 11

#79  Edited By TehFlan
@SeriouslyNow: 
But everyone's taxes are still paying for it. And some people can afford their own bills, but making them fork over more for the people that can't is sort of ridiculous. I'm not saying people should die because they don't have as much money as others, but it isn't the government's job to pay for them. It should be up to charities religious organizations and that kind of stuff.
Avatar image for seitanic
seitanic

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80  Edited By seitanic
@damnboyadvance said:

"And somehow, we have people talking about racism here. "

Maybe because the person being discussed is a racist piece of shit. Just a guess. 
Avatar image for privateirontfu
PrivateIronTFU

3858

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#81  Edited By PrivateIronTFU

I'm sure there are many things Rush and I agree on (politics definitely not being one of them). I still don't respect him as a human being. 

Avatar image for eternalinfinity0
EternalInfinity0

170

Forum Posts

1233

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#82  Edited By EternalInfinity0

Of course I agree with the main point, but he lost me at the trans fat comparison. It doesn't match up at all. Any 65-year-old who's spent his life shoveling fried chicken down his gullet can get MediCare, meaning that the mistake of maintaing such a poor diet is a mistake for whose correction the government is in some way responsible. Therefore, it's not unreasonable that the government would want some regulatory power in the food/nutrition arena; such power allows it to reduce the injustice of the situation: that responsible people who make an effort to eat healthy are paying for the treatment of some ass who's too lazy to resist the opposite temptation. I would think that someone like Limbaugh would be all for that reduction. Not only that, but if the government makes people eat better, then people will need less health care, and taxes that go toward those services will drop. I would think that Limbaugh would be all for that, too.
 
But there's no parallel in the video game issue. The government has no stake in it. No taxpayer money is going toward any form of aid for specifically those kids that have allegedly been adversely affected by video games (few and far between, I must assume, and perhaps no greater in number than those who have been equivalently affected by literature or film or television). So if they want to regulate my food, that's fine; their responsibility to take care of me when that food does harm me earns them the right to do that. But if they're going to sit there doing nothing about the so-called threats of video games-- which, by all means, Government, continue to do; they exist only in a negligible, government intervention-unworthy form, anyway-- then they need to SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET THE FUCK OUT.

Avatar image for agentj
AgentJ

8996

Forum Posts

6144

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 31

#83  Edited By AgentJ

Suddenly I find that regulation would be a good thing :P 
Not really, but could you imagine?

Avatar image for falconer
falconer

2136

Forum Posts

7383

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 21

#84  Edited By falconer

No Caption Provided
 
That is all.
Avatar image for hatking
hatking

7673

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85  Edited By hatking

I got to hand it to him.  He knows how to manipulate people. 
 
His problem is not understanding relativity.  Video games are far different than the other things he listed.  His argument is childish.  It's the typcial conservative this will lead to this style argument.  There is a difference in playing a violent video game which only might have a psychological affect on a person and driving the type of car which does have a real, serious impact on the environment.
Avatar image for cornbredx
cornbredx

7484

Forum Posts

2699

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

#86  Edited By cornbredx

Rush isnt always wrong. In the same vain I dont always agree with him. 
 
The reason he agrees with this view point is as he states, its all about free speech. They're trying to make it so its not about Free Speech (which blows me away... has Arnold Schwartzeneggars(sp?) brain fallen out? Has he forgotten the movies he's made? Are you serious? Games aren't the same my ass- I smell foul play on this one). 
 
Its fine they haven't thrown it out yet, let them make their case. Its full of trash, though. Seriously, games are subject to free speech just as much as movies or anything else that entails viewing, hearing, or reading. The whole thing is just silly.  
 
You can believe what you want, its your human right. When you start trying to force views on other people you are now enfringing on their human rights. Thats how it is.

Avatar image for monk122
monk122

9

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#87  Edited By monk122
@jim_dandy: you make the best point of all.
Avatar image for re_player1
RE_Player1

8074

Forum Posts

1047

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88  Edited By RE_Player1

He made some very valid points. I agree with him 100% and I hope Arnold fails with his law. 

Avatar image for sacerdos87
Sacerdos87

166

Forum Posts

2524

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89  Edited By Sacerdos87

This shit is stupid. Who cares how Rush feels about video games? Anyways, it doesn't feel relevant to the issue, it's apples and oranges, Here we got video games being put up in the supreme court to determine if they need government oversight and then you got a fat prick on the radio who says YES VIDEO GAMES ARE GOOD and somehow you want me to care. Fuck this noise.

Avatar image for meowshi
Meowshi

2917

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#90  Edited By Meowshi

Californians are idiots for voting him into office in the first place. 
 
Every time I hear him rant about the ultra-violence in video games, I just remember how shitty his movies would have been without them.   
 
You guys elected Mr. Freeze.  You deserve to have your video games regulated.  Have fun being the quirky, wacky state now.  Geniuses.  

Avatar image for chop
Chop

2013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#91  Edited By Chop

Screw that fat, racist bastard. He's always been a hypocritical asshole, he doesn't believe anything he actually said there. He's just saying "yay video games" because it serves his current agenda.

Avatar image for doctorchimp
Doctorchimp

4190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#92  Edited By Doctorchimp

censorship of art and expression =/= regulation to keep thing in line with other people.

Avatar image for deactivated-589cf9e3c287e
deactivated-589cf9e3c287e

1984

Forum Posts

887

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 4

"If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind?"
Frédéric Bastiat  (The Law)
 
(This next quote addressed to legislators)
 "Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
Frédéric Bastiat (The Law)
 
These quotes pretty much sum up my entire view on government and law.