What’s the best area from the last two games?

Avatar image for yeahbrother
YEAHbrother

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Poll What’s the best area from the last two games? (39 votes)

Tutorial Areas 0%
Paris 10%
Sapienza 44%
Marrakesh 0%
Bangkok 0%
Colorado 0%
Hokkaido 18%
Miami 13%
Columbia 0%
Mumbai 0%
Whittleton Creek 10%
Isle of Sgail 5%
 • 
Avatar image for therealturk
TheRealTurk

1411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Kinda hard to choose from that list. The only levels I really disliked were Marrakesh, Colorado, and Columbia. Marrakesh because the targets felt too spread out from one another and a huge chunk of that level (the Market), felt like it wasn't really used.

Colorado because it felt too much like there was a "right" way of doing the level and because it was so one note.

Columbia for sort of a combination of those reasons. It was definitely more varied than Colorado, but the connecting parts of the level just felt like a large corridors of jungle.

Avatar image for yeahbrother
YEAHbrother

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for asmo917
asmo917

949

Forum Posts

437

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 12

Funny thing is I agree with Colorado being the low point of these games, but I really like Colombia. Colombia reminds me of Sapienza (probably the actual right answer) in that it feels like multiple distinct areas flowing into one another with multiple approaches and opportunities throughout.

Avatar image for deactivated-61665c8292280
deactivated-61665c8292280

7702

Forum Posts

2136

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

I'd be curious to see the correlation between a level's difficulty and its general reputation amongst the player base. In my opinion, the more "fuck-with-able" a level is, the more I tend to like it. And I think I find that the easier missions--like Sapienza and Miami--offer more opportunities to do wild nonsense, as well as more ways to get away with that nonsense.

Missions with stricter fail-states, Colorado being chief among them, tend to encourage a more traditionally stealthy approach. And that's kind of not the way I want to play Hitman.

Avatar image for efesell
Efesell

7501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Efesell

Sapienza for embodying the true spirit of the new Hitman which is the cartoonish mishap stealth.

Probably a better answer for the level that embodies older Hitman but I dun care about any of that now.

Avatar image for therealturk
TheRealTurk

1411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'd be curious to see the correlation between a level's difficulty and its general reputation amongst the player base. In my opinion, the more "fuck-with-able" a level is, the more I tend to like it. And I think I find that the easier missions--like Sapienza and Miami--offer more opportunities to do wild nonsense, as well as more ways to get away with that nonsense.

Missions with stricter fail-states, Colorado being chief among them, tend to encourage a more traditionally stealthy approach. And that's kind of not the way I want to play Hitman.

I think I would be more OK with it if there were a bigger payoff for that level, but the assassinations are all kind of "meh" and outside of the scarecrow, the disguises aren't original enough to make for good comedy when things go real bad.

Avatar image for deactivated-61665c8292280
deactivated-61665c8292280

7702

Forum Posts

2136

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

@inevpatoria said:

I'd be curious to see the correlation between a level's difficulty and its general reputation amongst the player base. In my opinion, the more "fuck-with-able" a level is, the more I tend to like it. And I think I find that the easier missions--like Sapienza and Miami--offer more opportunities to do wild nonsense, as well as more ways to get away with that nonsense.

Missions with stricter fail-states, Colorado being chief among them, tend to encourage a more traditionally stealthy approach. And that's kind of not the way I want to play Hitman.

I think I would be more OK with it if there were a bigger payoff for that level, but the assassinations are all kind of "meh" and outside of the scarecrow, the disguises aren't original enough to make for good comedy when things go real bad.

I think you're absolutely right. Like @efesell said, not enough room for "mishap stealth" in Colorado. I liked crushing people with the car lift, ended up daisy-chaining something like six or seven kills consecutively without suspicion with those means. But everything else feels very boilerplate.