@captain_insano said:
"We made an unfortunate mistake with our Madden NFL soundtrack. Members of our team misunderstood the fact that while we don’t have rights to include Colin Kaepernick in the game, this doesn’t affect soundtracks."
This is a good "Oh shit, don't sue us, it was a legitimate mistake" excuse. It's bullshit, but it's a decent cover story for their actions.
@theoriginalatlas said:
This is such a weird story on so many levels.
My initial response to their excuse was that it was complete bullshit, but then when I thought about it I find it very hard to believe that EA would intentionally censor his name assuming that nobody would notice. Like, nobody who bought Madden was a Big Sean fan, and knows that Kaepernick's name is missing from the song? And then post about it on social media so the story gets picked up and become a PR nightmare? And if EA thought they needed to avoid a mention of Kaepernick for political reasons, why would they put two songs on the soundtrack that mention him by name and then censor it? They couldn't pick any other songs to use, or they noticed too late?
I think that if I allowed myself to believe that the censoring was intentional and they really are that stupid, I might lose whatever faith I had left in the human race.
So while it's entirely possible that the explanation is bullshit, in this instance I am actually inclined to believe them. Having worked in corporate legal departments, I can easily envision a scenario in which wires got crossed sending a question up and down the chain.
For example, someone on the dev team hears the song, and because they work intimately with the actual game, they know they don't have the rights to use Colin Kapernick as a player likeness, but because they aren't a lawyer, they aren't sure if that also extends to the song lyrics. So they figure "We should ask Legal first to be sure."
So the question gets sent up the chain, but because the devs aren't lawyers, it gets phrased in such a way that it isn't clear to the Legal department that they are talking about the song lyrics rather than the likeness. In other words the question easily could have gotten phrased like "Hi guys, quick question - If we don't have the rights to use Colin Kapernick, can we use his name in the game?"
Then the Legal department, because they are very busy and the question looks very simple, take the question at face value without following up like they should and assume the dev team is talking about a player likeness. So the answer that gets passed back down from Legal is "If you don't have the rights, don't use him. We could get sued."
Then that gets interpreted by the dev team as "Oh, shit. We better bleep that name out of the song so we don't get in trouble."
So everyone has acted in good faith but the situation get fucked up anyway.
Or it could just be PR and corporate being a bunch of jerks. It IS EA.
Log in to comment