I thought of this today and thought it was really funny.
Would you rather live in a world without bacon, if it meant that the Star Wars Prequels were awesome?
Giant Bomb is under new ownership.
Log in now to accept new terms and conditions and transfer your account to the new owner!
Bacon Vs. Star Wars Prequels
Even if the Star Wars prequels were, somehow, in some catastrophically abstract universe, good, civilization would combust were it not for bacon.
Bacon of course...but I do like Star Wars...although...bacon...NO! STAR WARS!!! BACON!!! STAR WARS!!! AARRGGHH!!!! Ok I chose bacon yall.
" @Interfect: But in the other world they would be AWESOME! I don't think you understand the question. They would be just as good if not better than the originals in this world without bacon. "Being both extraneous and erroneous by definition immediately prevents the prequels from having any chance, any possibility, of being better than the originals. And I don't even like the originals that much. But the story was done and told already in several different formats, and all we needed to know was already implied or exposited in the first trilogy.
You know what. I would give almost anything to remove the shit stain that is the Star Wars Prequels. Nothing against bacon though.
" @Landon said:You say this, but in a bacon-less world its true. Also, who says that these prequels are set in the same time frame? Maybe they are like KOTOR and take place thousands of years before the orignals just because George Lucas wanted to tell a different story. You people seem to have the idea that they are the same movies, but just good. In this bacon-less world they could be ANYTHING, its just fact that they are awesome." @Interfect: But in the other world they would be AWESOME! I don't think you understand the question. They would be just as good if not better than the originals in this world without bacon. "Being both extraneous and erroneous by definition immediately prevents the prequels from having any chance, any possibility, of being better than the originals. And I don't even like the originals that much. But the story was done and told already in several different formats, and all we needed to know was already implied or exposited in the first trilogy. "
" @Sir_Ragnarok said:That's nice and all, but I'd still take bacon." @Landon said:You say this, but in a bacon-less world its true. Also, who says that these prequels are set in the same time frame? Maybe they are like KOTOR and take place thousands of years before the orignals just because George Lucas wanted to tell a different story. You people seem to have the idea that they are the same movies, but just good. In this bacon-less world they could be ANYTHING, its just fact that they are awesome. "" @Interfect: But in the other world they would be AWESOME! I don't think you understand the question. They would be just as good if not better than the originals in this world without bacon. "Being both extraneous and erroneous by definition immediately prevents the prequels from having any chance, any possibility, of being better than the originals. And I don't even like the originals that much. But the story was done and told already in several different formats, and all we needed to know was already implied or exposited in the first trilogy. "
" Eating raw bacon is better than watching the Star War prequels. "I eat pre-cooked bacon "raw". It's actually pretty good.
" good star wars prequels. i don't eat bacon anyways. "Then you have to act as a Utilitarian. Think about the aggregate happiness in a world without bacon. Entire economies would collapse. Logically, you must choose bacon.
The smell of bacon makes me violently ill. Despite that, its still preferable to the Star Wars prequels.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment