@Bassman2112: While I don't really think music is the best medium to do it in, I can appreciate artists who want to convey a specific, cerebral message. But I don't like this guy. And I'm not trying to prove any sort of superiority here, I'd simply like to engage you in conversation what makes music with a complex message good. I can explain thoroughly why I don't like this style.
To me, it seems like he's broadcasting his opinion as hard and as harsh as he can, and as if it's the only truth. There's no humility, no "Well, this is how I see it". A lot of his songs feel extremely self-involved as well, telling stories about his life. Which, yeah, is common in music, but he's often doing it in such an obvious way, whereas a lot of other artists obfuscate it and bury it deep down. Blatancy when applied to art makes it less artful.
What's more, when I read his lyrics, I just... Think he's a bad person? A lot of his songs are about relationships he's had, which is all fine and good, but the way he writes about it just comes off in a really bad way. One is very literally about him bangin' and the girl loving his skills. One is about him sexin' up his co-worker, one is about a disgustingly literal comparison between chess and love, one is praising his own song composition with lyrics like "Forget your preconceived notions of song structure"... These do not come off well to me. Or others, it seems. From that perspective, you can probably see how applying the word intelligent to this guy would rile people up. Anyway, I've just heard of him, so maybe you have something to convince me that he's an alright guy - because I do like the music itself. I certainly don't mean to invalidate your own personal taste by telling you my own, but when you mention conveying messages, two guys spring to mind:
David Bazan has made several albums straight up attacking religion. What makes his message more digestible to me is that he distances himself from it. Never does he tell a straight anecdote about himself. He conveys it through allusions and wordplay that service the song before the message. He pulls off something remarkable in making an album that, by nature, should be preachy, not. At least in my eyes. There's a clear message, but it still needs to be interpreted and deciphered.
And then there's this guy:
He's very similar to Gavin in that he talks about himself and his experiences almost exclusively in his music and there's little room for interpretation, but to me this works better then Gavin's because he serves it with a heaping helping of self-doubt and vulnerability. That song is totally all about him, and it's totally expounding his personal philosophy, but it's steeped in so much self-deprecation that it doesn't seem self-aggrandising. You listen to that and you can tell that he's simply trying to show you what he's personally learned through his own life experiences. It's the same with Bazan really. Hard to Be is phrased in a way that implicates "I don't understand", as opposed to Gavin's "You don't understand".
As far as intelligence goes, their compositions might not be genius, and their message may not be as 'important', but these guys at least convey their message with a little more subtlety and grace - and that, to me, is intelligent above all else.
Log in to comment