As someone who "fell" for this over a decade ago (Cdn Forces, Army), I'll lend my two cents. Also, I was previously a recruiter and have since returned to the artillery
It's a volunteer army. Conscription is still technically feasible but by and large, the people who put on uniforms are there because they chose to do so. Members of the combat arms (infantry, artillery, armored, etc) are generally the hardest people to "keep" as their jobs are typically the most physically demanding, they face the worst working conditions, and they receive virtually no meaningful compensation for the actual hardship of their duties. Specialists (this isn't a rank in my country so I use the term generally here) and other "skilled" entrants generally have an easier time & get paid more - sometimes considerably more - so they tend to stay signed up a lot longer.
But for these frontline trades, there's a ton of attrition. Many people tend to leave these jobs fast, especially after tours. After a contract of a couple years, many will want to quit entirely or find a more relaxed military trade. We could pay these people more, arguably a reasonable solution considering the higher chance of injury and/or death they face, but since members of these combat jobs are often extremely numerous this would get pretty expensive. It's already difficult to get more money for the military as it is, so in practical terms it's nearly impossible to justify said increase.
The most economical solution? Reach new people who are genuinely interested in battle, in weapons, in the tactical and leadership qualities which are needed for combat trades. Let them give it a shot, and sure maybe only 1 in 5 stays for the long haul... but that's enough to train & lead future combat sections, most likely still composed of fresh soldiers who will probably only volunteer for a short time because of how tough it is being in the infantry (or artillery, or armor, etc). It's usually not fair, it's usually not fun, but then again neither is warfare.
Ads like the ones above are basically a way to try and invite people to at least consider what the good aspects can be like. As I said above, it's a volunteer army - but troops are still needed, and that means forces reserve the right to be inviting and show off their positive aspects to entice said volunteers. Is it wrong to potentially mislead some people this way? I don't think so, at least any moreso than any other kind of advertising, because this is way more important than some new toothbrush or an upcoming movie.
Damn this turned into a rant real fast... I could keep writing about this & other realities of an enlisted career ad nauseum but at some point the discussion is of limited use to Americans because my country's forces are extremely underfunded and understaffed which leads to other, unique consequences we won't get into
Log in to comment