How Well Can You Hear Audio Quality? Blind Listening Test

  • 72 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for winsord
winsord

1642

Forum Posts

86

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Poll How Well Can You Hear Audio Quality? Blind Listening Test (179 votes)

0/6 6%
1/6 15%
2/6 18%
3/6 19%
4/6 22%
5/6 9%
6/6 3%
Skipped the test, show me the results 12%

Take the test here.

I was curious as to how well fellow Bombers could tell the difference between audio file quality. The test has six songs, each with a 128kbps MP3, 320kbps MP3, and a Lossless WAV variant. I did the test listening through my headphones, the Hifiman HE-400i, passed through an AudioQuest Dragonfly DAC.

On my first go I got 4/6 for uncompressed, Jay Z I picked 320, and Katy Perry I picked 128. There's a World was the only track I've really listened to before; I've also heard Speed of Sound plenty of times as background, but never really listened to it intently. I ran the test a second and third time afterwards and got 6/6. Felt a bit weird because I used to feel like I couldn't even tell the difference between 192 and 320 most of the time, but that was on my Sennheiser HD518s so maybe it's the new headphones.

Neil Young was immediately obvious to me because I've listened to that album in FLAC a bunch of times. Suzzane Vega and Murray Perahia were also obvious, even though I hadn't heard either before, but both of those styles seem to lend themselves towards making the differences stand out. The Coldplay track sounds worse in 320 than 128, and even worse than that in Lossless because there's so much crackling, but I knew this was an issue with certain tracks off X&Y before doing this test. If I didn't already have that knowledge, I almost certainly would've picked 128.

Jay Z sounded the same at 320 and Lossless for me so it was simply a guess between the two and I happened to get it wrong. Even though I got it right two times afterwards, I wasn't confident in my answer any of the three times. Katy Perry admittedly I kind of rushed through the first time because I can't stand to listen to her, but listening to it the second time and third times I focused on the snaps and it became pretty obvious.

So, how'd you do? What equipment did you use when you took the test?

 • 
Avatar image for winsord
winsord

1642

Forum Posts

86

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#51  Edited By winsord

What was with the high quality version of the Coldplay song having static? Was it a trick?

It's somewhat renowned for being a terribly mixed album, alongside Suzanne Vega's "Solitude Standing". The compression ends up unintentionally cleaning up most of the crackling, so the 128kbps version sounds better than its higher-quality counterparts. Actually, as a couple of the other comments have said, it seems like they intentionally tried to pick things that are mixed poorly or recorded on older technology, given most of the song choices.

Avatar image for doctordonkey
doctordonkey

2142

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

2/6, just kinda thumbing through, not spending much time on it. They all sounded fine to me. I can proudly say I am not one of those loony bins that has to listen to all music uncompressed with headphones that cost them a grand.

Avatar image for hunter5024
Hunter5024

6708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

I got 2/6. Only got Katy Perry and Jay Z right. Chose the worst option 3 times. I didn't feel particularly confident for any answers except one, which I got wrong. I'm listening with 10 dollar earbuds though, so I guess that's to be expected, but if I had several hundred dollar headphones on I doubt I'd do much better.

Avatar image for tricky_dicky
tricky_dicky

10

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54  Edited By tricky_dicky

4/6 on cheap earbuds. Katy Perry and jay-z were the easiest. I got Suzanne Vega and Neil Young wrong.

Avatar image for viciousreiven
ViciousReiven

983

Forum Posts

46

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I can usually tell the difference between different bitrates of MP3s, but I can't really tell the difference between a 320kbps MP3 and lossless. Got 3/6, with all the wrong ones being 320s

Avatar image for deactivated-60dda8699e35a
deactivated-60dda8699e35a

1807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Considering I'm hard of hearing in both ears (pretty much deaf in my right), I'm surprised that I managed to get 3/6 of them. To be fair though, I think that's more luck than anything, since none of them sounded very different to me.

Avatar image for koolaid
koolaid

1435

Forum Posts

16

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I only got 1/6, but for everyone I picked the wrong one I picked the 320 one. I could hear that difference, but no real difference between the uncompressed and 320. Guess I was just unlucky on all of them save for the Coldplay one.

Since I can't really hear a difference between them I don't care that much. Never have to be honest. Not an audiophile, so I only got a pair of G930 wireless headphones.

So I don't know. I learned I don't need uncompressed audio to be happy with the quality, and that I still fucking hate rap.

Me too. I could always spot the bad 128 one but for some reason kept picking the 320 as the best. Maybe because thats the format I listen to the most?

Avatar image for franticrain
FranticRain

155

Forum Posts

92

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@korwin said:

X&Y is a terrible thing to sample, the master of that album is horrible.

I got that one wrong mostly because I didn't want to listen to Coldplay, but you're right. The mastery is abysmal.

I got 3/6 on a pair of ATH-M50LEs hooked up to an Asus Xonar Essence STX. I got bored toward the end and that's when I made all of my mistakes. Wish the test's taste in music had been a bit better.

Avatar image for sterling
Sterling

4134

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#59  Edited By Sterling

They all sounded exactly the same to me. I got 0 out of 6.

Avatar image for spoonman671
Spoonman671

5874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60  Edited By Spoonman671

I got 2/6. I think the recordings themselves played a part in this because the ones I got right were extremely easy for me to determine. There was no doubt in my mind about those two. I'm listening on these. I haven't been thrilled about these speakers since I got them.

Tried again with my Koss PortaPros and got 2/6 again. Same two.

Avatar image for spoonman671
Spoonman671

5874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

6/6 with my $20 earbuds plugged to my phone. To be honest, I got them all right based on how long they took to load. I could barely tell the difference.

Living up to your user name.

Avatar image for mirado
Mirado

2558

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If they really wanted to make this test hard, they should have swapped 128 for V0. There's really no perceptible difference between V0 and 320, but you get a 20% reduction in file size, which is nice.

Lossless audio will always sound as good as 320 or V0 (barring any weirdness like compression helping to clean up bad mixing), but will often sound no better for a huge jump in file size (2x or more). I keep everything in FLAC for two reasons: I have a 18TB NAS so space isn't an issue, and FLAC's the best thing to transcode from.

Avatar image for stonyman65
stonyman65

3818

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

4 out of 6. I missed the Coldplay and Katy Perry samples. I picked the 128kb version for both after going back and forth between that and the uncompressed version. I'm listening though a decent quality headset through the front audio ports on my PC. I'm sure if I was using my Fiio E07 and Sennheiser HD558s I would have caught those two. I usually listen to music through my iPod line out with the amp and 558's and I can definitely hear a quality difference between songs that were ripped at 320kb MP3 or better and songs that aren't. Probably wouldn't be able to tell without an amp though.

TL;DR: Those audiophile people on hi-fi aren't crazy after all. Good high-impedance headphones and an amp make all the difference in the world.

Avatar image for ben_h
ben_h

5284

Forum Posts

1628

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

3/6 first try not really trying. 4/6 second try actually listening to the samples multiple times. I did the thing a third time and I still got the Katy Perry song wrong. The piano song was easy, as was the female vocals. Jay-Z I got 320kb instead of lossless the first time and got right the second time. I got the coldplay one right every time. I got the Neil Young one on my third try.

Music I'm familiar with I can tell apart immediately, but for this stuff it was kinda tricky.

Avatar image for evilsbane
Evilsbane

5624

Forum Posts

315

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

2/6 the only song I could actually hear the difference on was Vega's Tom's Dinner because its just her voice so its easier to hear the slight imperfections but it seriously is so hard to tell especially when there is instrumentation.

Avatar image for dilkington
Dilkington

84

Forum Posts

31

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66  Edited By Dilkington

4/6 only after getting the first two wrong and realizing I could not tell the difference what so ever. I just looked at the bandwidth usage each one used to play and it became very clear which one was uncompressed. yay for cheating!

Avatar image for recroulette
recroulette

5460

Forum Posts

13841

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 11

4/6. Could not differentiate the Mozart and Coldplay songs.

Avatar image for belegorm
Belegorm

1862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I gave up after the 2nd one. I'm using a good hyperx cloud 2 headset, but I already know that my hearing isn't great, so all of the 3 choices sounded the same to me.

Avatar image for chrjz
chrjz

583

Forum Posts

83

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#69  Edited By chrjz

5/6 but in my defence that Coldplay song was the first choice and mastered poorly. I thought I was hearing compression artifacts. If it was last I would have noticed that and picked correctly, I'm sure. I've also never listened to any of those songs before.

I have S/PDIF from my PC to a DAC then amplifier with Beyerdynamic DT880 (600 ohm).

I regularly seek out, and listen to, lossless quality music. To the people that don't hear it... you're not used to hearing it or you don't have the ears for it.

Avatar image for raven10
Raven10

2427

Forum Posts

376

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 5

I just have basic gaming headset so I couldn't really hear the difference. My understanding is that to hear a lot of the extra detail you need high quality headphones. I know that I can immediately tell the difference between listening to a lossless file on some bose headphones and listening to an MP3 using my headset, but I just don't have the money to spend hundreds of dollars on headphones.

Avatar image for feathered
Feathered

244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71  Edited By Feathered

3/6, though I don't know how much of that was me actually being like "oh, this one is obviously the WAV uncompressed version"... I'm using a pair of Astro A40's plugged into my computer.

Also, to the guy saying the non-compressed versions are easy to distinguish because they start a little faster than the other 2, I re-took the test and got a 6/6 easily because the WAV versions started... slower than the other versions. Weird?

Avatar image for krevee
Krevee

190

Forum Posts

587

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

I got 4/6 with my Triton gaming headphones.

Avatar image for anden4300
anden4300

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

4/6 with my Sennheiser Momentum plugged straight in to my Macbook, To be honest i couldn't really tell the difference but hearing the lossless vs mp3 with a headphone amp or on my B&W loudspeakers you can tell the difference immediately and it is SO big.