@doctordonkey said:
All of Twitterspeak, basically. "bad/hot/spicy take", "oof", "yikes", "this ain't it chief" "big mood". I just find all of it absolutely insufferable, which means I barely ever look at Twitter. Even very intelligent people I generally enjoy listening to like Austin Walker and Alex use all of it way too much. As soon as one dumb phrase stops being used, new ones take their place. It's a never ending cycle of nonsense.
This one right here. Someone says something people don't like and regardless of the severity of the initial statement or topic at hand, they just say "oh boy is that a hot/spicy take" to dismiss it and not have to engage with it at all. Calling something someone else said a hot take is basically short for saying "you're wrong", but obfuscates how dismissive you're being.
Much more annoying are the people who use "don't @ me", it drives me insane, again for being so dismissive. Even using it as a joke normalizes it, fuck that.
I feel like most twitter speak simply exists to allow you to say or dismiss outrageous things without actually engaging with people. It's all just screaming into the void, and it's spread outside twitter like a metastatic cancer.
People calling their videogame characters toons drives me up the wall for some reason, but that doesn't reflect poorly on them as people, it's just something I personally find weird.
Yeah, some of these annoy me as well. Time for some nitpicks!
I think most instances of online text-only lingo filtering into verbal everyday speech are usually unnecessary. "Hot take" I don't mind as much, that's just an expression, but saying "don't @ me" aloud is about is silly as the people who would say "LUL/LOL/ROFL" aloud. I agree with you in the sense that a lot of text-only online lingo isn't about having an actual discussion, and is usually more focused on getting in jabs at whoever you're talking to, or simply stating an opinion/emotion that you just want to put out in the world and not have to listen to any feedback or dissenting opinions about. Those really have no place in IRL conversations where you're speaking with a small number of people that you actually want a dialogue with, though I admit things get murky with GB staff since they're often also vaguely addressing chat/the podcast audience.
Also, yeah, right there with you on hating "toon" to refer to one's character in a (usually) online game. Just say character instead? Why add needless extra jargon? The origin of the term "toon" is apparently hard to trace exactly, and it's so ingrained in the MMO culture now that we'll never get it out, but really, just say "character." As someone who never fell to the thrall of MMORPGs, this is how I feel about most MMO lingo. A lot of MMO lingo needlessly obfuscates the conversation with jargon when there are other more broadly used terms in the gaming sphere. For example, if Brad wants to use MMO lingo during a Destiny raid to describe things that are literally MMO mechanics, that's fine, but I die a little inside every time he says "mats" on a Bombcast when talking about Read Dead or something, as if saying "crafting materials" is so arduous for his human face muscles.
On a related note, it's not a turn of phrase, but I'm really not into when people use the weird in-universe terms for characters. It blows my mind that when asking about League of Legends, people will ask "What champ do you play?" instead of asking "What character do you play?" Champion, hero, etc., are words that have meanings, and if every character on the character select screen of your game are all equally considered a champion/hero, then the word has lost all meaning and you should just say "character." Except somewhere in some marketing room they figured out that 12-year-olds might think you game is more "epic" if every character is a "champion." I'd be fine if there was some kind of game where half the characters were "heroes" and half were "villains" and they played in some kind of asymmetric way, where "which hero/villain do you play?" is a meaningful question like "which support do you play?", but when hero/champ isn't a class and is literally just a dumb synonym for "character", the whole things feels asinine.
Log in to comment