Pyramids are formed from triangles. Triangles are formed from lines. Lines form the basis of almost every shape. Everything we can see is a shape. Everything is tied to the Illumanati.
@HitmanAgent47: Really a dozen posts a week? That's a bold ass claim, however the number of around six in totality sounds more correct. Also you are correct in saying that I didn't google all of your points about the illuminati, then again your profile suggests that you will provide evidence if asked. Also so far I've only judged you as someone unwilling or unable to present a coherent advocacy. But whatever I guess this won't click with you either. So shine on you crazy diamond.
MC Hammer is a childhood hero. I rememer his Hammerman cartoon fondly. It makes me sad that he is perpetuating this illuminati conspiracy BS. I hope he is just using it for the purposes of a diss record and doesn't actually buy into it.
@HitmanAgent47: You seem to not understand the difference between a reference and advocating. Yeah, those are Illuminati symbols in GTA IV, Modern Warfare 2 and Max Payne but they are all just references. GTA IV is a satire of conspiracy theorists and in Modern Warfare 2, the perk is called "Sit Rep" and it allows the user to detect nearby explosives, hence the "all seeing eye". It doesn't mean Activison is run by the Freemasons.
" @dudeglove: the words there means, our enterprise."
Actually, "Coeptis" means "our enterprise" or "our undertakings". Annuit means "He favors". The full first line is thus, "He favors our undertakings." The second line is "A new order of the ages" and was inspired by a poem by Virgil. The year referenced on the pyramid, MDCCLXXVI, is 1776. The undertaking which began a new age was obviously the Declaration of Independence. The founding of a new nation is what is being described, not some weird secret society business.
Making the horns is an old Italian gesture meant to ward off curses or bad luck, like knocking on wood. The metal "devil sign" usage is rather new.
And seriously, the dude in A Scanner Darkly is a conspiracy theorist. That's why he has the shirt.
I'm kind of surprised no one mentioned triangles could be phallic symbols. (of course this thread is so long I might have missed it) /\ = male \/ = female
Of course i could be just thinking this because one of my friends spent a whole ihop trip making dirty jokes just to watch another friend get red in the face with embarrassment. Yeah, I have some weird friends.
@beej: You call me crazy, you admit you do absolutely no research. I bet you never even read a single bible passage in your entire life, you never researched into anything occult related. So what gives you the right to draw conclusions? You are what they call a sheep. You need a sheppard and that's the government and media to think for your because you can't think for yourself. Next time before you reply, actually plz don't reply, unless you take a second to google some of my points. If you see something for my next post answering a question about skull and bones, google it for example, then reply. You are not a psychiatrist or the judge of other ppl's mental illness because i've been to two of them and they couldn't find anything from me for a full dianoses. Currently I don't have a dianoses for anything real so your once again ignorant pretending you know anything about anything. If I did, I could get money for it, plan backfired, okay i'm a douche for doing that. One thing they noticed was I was really overly bright as they said, also very understanding compared to most of the ppl they talked to. For my reply to your last post, I already listed them for the last post for my points against your last false statements against how the conspiracy therorist doesn't line up with what i'm saying. It actually does, it just took a few more wiki pages to line up with my points and if you call me crazy, what about all the other conspiracy theorist? Are they all crazy too? So there are millions of unbrainwashed ppl out there who questions things, are crazy? what if they can sort of see patterns better than you? if you don't understand what i'm trying to say, then how can I reply to your constant misunderstanding? If i'm getting insults from you because you are a closed minded sheep, then really your the one who's happy the world thinks for you and shape world events around you being completely oblivious to it. One day if they tried to form a one world government, you will lose all your freedom and it's totally deserved. I've never talked to anyone more close minded and you say you only replied six times not a dozen times, well that adds another unnecessary post with more misunderstanding then, that's seven replies there. For this week, I bet you will go past a dozen replies.
Look I don't mind answering some of your questions and any questions if ppl ask. However it's really difficult to answer your endless replies when they need some research. Should I just ignore all your post then because I know you won't research them and unfairly judge me and I can't reply to misunderstanding? I feel that's a bit harsh.
I mean to other ppl understand the patriots in metal gear solid games? I'm not asking you beej, I know the answer is already no, go google it. However that's really a reference to the new world order and their control of the world. Also remember, that the triangle needs an eye in it, not just any triangles. Jay-z at a concert can't put an eye in the middle, yet make that triangle hand gesture.
no eye in the middle, no illuminati triangle
eye in the middle, with a triangle, illuminati symbol
@MrMcgillicutty: Hi, who is skull and bones? That's really the first organisation bush and kerry, bush senior and many presidents power ppl were part of. Their entry into the new world order. Later on they join the free masons, other groups and stuff.
@HitmanAgent47: Thanks for once again making shit up about me. Where do I draw any conclusion other than that you haven't given a cohesive proof for the illuminati? I never said you were wrong, or that you were crazy I just asked for a coherent argument which given that you are currently the one asserting positive fact is entirely on you. Also this is a quotation from your profile "My opinion is usually right about everything and based on facts since I can back up any of my statements by request. " So that's all I was doing was requesting some sort of legitimate argument. Where have I done anything other than give you a fair shake in all of this. Do I agree with you right now? No. But does that mean I'm dismissing you on face? Not really. This is why I just asked for a proof, which once again if I can reiterate my point, is the burden of the person asserting something as fact. You're merely lumping me into a larger group and responding as such. That being said I'll give you another chance to prove that you can back up your statements. Go find a quotation from me where I call you crazy.
Edit: also thanks for assuming I've never read a bible passage which is great coming from the person who bases everything on facts, since I totally have read bible passages.
@beej: I have given you names, organisations of those I believe are part of the umbrella organisation called the illuminati or the new world order. I have showed you how they manipulated their occult symbolism through media. Proof is something that's really difficult to prove. We can't even prove gravity exist. However know the difference between evidence, which I believe patterns are great evidence. This triangle with an eye, which I had no idea of a couple of months ago, is popping up everywhere in mainstream media and even media before I wasn't aware of. It's a great discovery. Like I said, science can't prove how the universe started, so asking for proof is not something even scientist can provide for everything natural phenomenon. So instead ask for some evidence to support your conclusions.
Here is a piece of proof and evidence of you calling me crazy. Look if you have to call me crazy, you have to call a million conspiracy theorist the same thing too. It's not just like labeling an indivdual based on assumptions. Also remember, an astrologist once said the world is round and not flat. Another one said we aren't the center of the universe for example, even if others disagreed at the time. So you disagreeing with my evidence to my statements doesn't mean you are a good judge of what is proof or no proof, since you couldn't judge the status of other's mental illnesses which I don' have an official dianoses for anything. Since absolute proof is very difficult to obtain, even by scientist which only has theories, like string theory for example. I have theories too, they label these such theories as conspiracy theories. I already provided you with all the major players involved in the conspiracy, I already said the federal reserve isn't a real federal bank who is bankrupting our nation. I have shown a pattern, which is no coincidence of the triangle with an eye logo. There are patterns everywhere in nature, as there are patterns in everything else. Maybe as an artist myself, maybe I have an eye for such observation and awareness that other ppl might filter out. Not sure really.
For someone who doesn't read up on what I am talking about on google, you sure don't read up on your last post you sent me. Look for my bio, sure I try to provide facts, however when we are talking about conspiracy theories, just like other theories like the theory of gravity, string theory, the theory of evolution, they are just the best theory at the time to explain things. I think we should just respect each other's views even if we disagree with each other. If we all think the same way, we will all be sheeps.
@beej
said:
Really a dozen posts a week? That's a bold ass claim, however the number of around six in totality sounds more correct. Also you are correct in saying that I didn't google all of your points about the illuminati, then again your profile suggests that you will provide evidence if asked. Also so far I've only judged you as someone unwilling or unable to present a coherent advocacy. But whatever I guess this won't click with you either. So shine on you crazy diamond. "
@HitmanAgent47: really you're taking that almost completely out of context, Shine on you crazy diamond is something that you say to someone who's doing something that you don't agree with but they insist in doing it, essentially it can be seen as being said in the same vain as the person earlier who told you to keep on being you. Also I understand that proof is hard to determine, arguably it's impossible but when we consider a theory to be the one that we operate under we have to be able to argue as to why it is a more accurate accounting of the facts presented to us than competing theories. In this case the predominant theory is basically parsimony, which means your burden isn't to prove that there are triangles with eyes in them, but instead to prove why those triangles with eyes are necessarily linked to the illuminati. At best all you're currently doing is presenting a competing theory with no real argument to accept it over anything else. A pattern itself doesn't prove anything since most patterns have near infinite explanations. Once again thank you for assuming that I've never cracked open a bible.
@beej: go to official illuminati websites. I wrote illuminati logos on google, I found some official websites which uses these logos. While they might not be exactly the same, they all have a triangle with an eye on it. I mean if we are talking about cars for example, you see ford logos, it belongs to their company and organisation, dispite the revisions right? It's also on wiki, they use the same logo, so does the american dollar bill. Surely if these so called illuminati sites are using this logo? Then it has some kind of meaning, considering those who are accused like jay-z, rihanna are using the same logo as being members of it. I mean there is definetly a pattern. To me two is a conincidence, three is a pattern. With a pattern, there probally is an explaination why it's not a coincidence. Like I said about you believing me, when I say the world is round. If you don't believe me, you are not a good judge of what is true or not, since you demonstated it consistently that you have been wrong about me and wrong about you calling me crazy. I don't know what that saying is, I googled shine on you crazy diamond and it said it's a song or something. I can find alot of old post of you calling me crazy. Still you being wrong about me consistently is starting to show up as a pattern.
I assume some of these sites are their official site, so they are using that triangle with an eye on it. Which ones are the official sites? That's something you would have to google because myself don't enter their sites.
@HitmanAgent47: Ok I think that you've had a fair chance, and you've shown that you either aren't reading, aren't understanding, or not bothering to respond, to what I wrote. So I'm out on this conversation, I literally tried my damndest to get you to do what you needed to do to prove your point and as far as I can tell you avoided it like the plague. So much for trying to elevate the discussion...
@beej: You aren't seeing it, the order of the illuminati is probally their real site for the public. They are using the logo, why would they use that logo with a triangle and eye for their official site? If that's not their real site, then illuminati news is which I doubt. You once again don't understand the context of anything. You saw the google screenshot and it made no sense to you, you didn't know which sites to look for. You then dismissed it as not being a pattern, when there is a pattern right there. You never googled their official site. Here is a site for you if you want to read it, spell illuminati backwards and write.com. I ask others not to try this because it's a u.s government spy site, unless you like being spied on. This info will be edited out later on. Then at least that shows the government's involvement and is more concrete than anything i've posted about their involvement, on top of the logo being on currency and this logo is part of media too. That's good evidence right there, really good evidence which you will probally try to spin. You might say that's not good evidence, when it is, like I said, you are not a good judge of character or anything else. I'm glad you will never answer my post again or talk to me, it relives me the burden of trying to explain everything to you carefully like your a child.
@HitmanAgent47: You know, when the world ends and the earth starts flying towards the abyss, I want you to lead the way dude.
Fuck it.
Also I've noticed that people who get deep into Illuminati stuff usually end up in trouble (or so the movies tell me) so it might be better just to lay low for awhile.
@dudeglove: what are you talking about? I am using screenshots from a youtube video with a ton of movies references with that triangle symbol. You completely ignored the other screenshot with the same illuminati logo on hackers as the one posted in the first post of this thread, why ignore that symbol and blame me for this one? Maybe you if actually watched that video before commenting. I don't control the movie references from that video, they just showed alot of illuminati stuff from videos and t.v shows. I posted a few screenshots, just to give ppl an idea of what to expect if they watched the youtube video.
I have watched a scanner darkly, yes I know the context of it. However I thought ppl will like to see that the logo is in movies everywhere.
angelia jolie is in an illuminati movie, then she's out of nowhere an embassador to the U.N?
what you don't think they control the content you see in movies?
Log in to comment