@leebmx: I never once said anything about killing the people. But when your country launches a nuclear weapon and you're given the choice to cooperate with the UN sanctioned actions or resist, you're asking for it. Not to be an ass, but nuclear aggression cannot be allowed to continue. The casualties from taking control of North Korea would be nothing compared to the casualties from a North Korea with nuclear launch capabilities allowed to persist. A nuclear strike will almost certainly cause tens and likely hundreds of thousands of deaths. And as someone who lives in a city that is one of the top targets that North Korea would have in the states (Seattle, massive port city with a very large population), I think I'm ok with saying if they fucking attack us, that's an act of war and we need to defend ourselves. If you're okay with allowing a nuclear strike to go unpunished, by all means you do that. Me on the other hand? I'll gladly go and kick any punk's ass that thinks that the civilian casualties from the theoretical nuclear strike were deserved and is going to fight to allow that capability to persist.
I also know that with North Korea's size, we could easily go in and kick the asses that really deserve it before the rest of the country has a chance to respond.
I'd rather see some civilians killed in a battle to prevent another nuclear strike than see uncountable civilians killed from another strike. I don't care where the first nuke lands, it could be in the middle of Afghanistan and I'd still feel that the right thing to do would be to go the fuck in and kick their asses and teach that little runt in charge that we aren't fucking around.
I don't want a nuke to land anywhere in the world. I don't want to see Marines go in and get killed because they are the first response force, and a whole hell of alot of them are stationed within striking distance of Korea. I don't want to see civilians killed. But ya know what? Sometimes there are greater evils in the world than war.
So next time you want to twist my words into war mongering, you should maybe think twice. My willingness to engage in a war that is justified does not make me a murderous individual nor does it mean that I desire the deaths of innocents. Hell, part of why I want to enlist and get a chance to kick some Taliban ass is because it sickens me to think there are bullies with guns able to walk around and push around the population using violence and fear.
And I don't care who you are or how liberal or hippy dippy or conservative you are. Nuclear power is too great to allow to be used unchecked. If it comes to the point where a nuclear capable nation so much as attempts to carry out a strike with a nuclear warhead, you'd be crazy to say direct intervention is not required immediately. Would you prefer that we just go with an eye for an eye and nuke them right back with a much bigger bomb? Or would you prefer that we send our soldiers into harms way so as to avoid civilian casualties? Because that seems like an awfully nice course of action to me, but it's the way we'd probably do things.
I also made it pretty clear I never expect anything to come of this. At least not from 'this' North Korea. They are weak, they are incapable, and they have NO allies. It's not happening. Even if they launch something, we have so many systems in place to prevent a warhead from being effective.
Perhaps you've heard this before, but generally military men do not desire war. But if there's going to be one, you sure as hell better bet they want to be in on it. It's a reality of the world, war exists. I want to experience that, and I'd rather it be me going to war, someone entirely willing to make those sacrifices than some kid who got in over his head. For every guy like me that steps forward, totally willing and capable there's a reduced chance that some idiot would rush into it thinking he can hack it, and then get either himself or others killed needlessly.
Log in to comment