[POLL] World Domination Games: Earth Maps or Made Up Maps?
When it comes to something like Civ/Risk I always play on Earth maps for my first few games, but after I have the basic down I find myself always going for the pre-made stuff or the randomly generated maps. I just find that Earth maps get kind of predictable after a while, just because we know where everything is most of the time, even if it's covered by the fog of war, so it's kind of hard to get unique games going on them a lot of the time.
I enjoy both. Certain games work better with legit places and other times I just feel like taking over an unexisting place and destroying their society.
Great... now I want to reinstall Civilization 5 and play that some more. Curse you mind and your random thread ideas!
I like both pretty much equally, though I often want to try out an earth map first to see how it is.
I prefer Earth maps because the areas are familiar and I can visualize the circumstances that led to the conflict easier. Fake maps don't drawn me in as much. I do think I could be satisfied with a fake map if it was for a world I understood more, though. Say an Axis & Allies game that took place in Warcraft's Azeroth or Tamriel from the Elder Scrolls.
I voted for made up maps. In a game like Civ, I like to not know what's out there at all beyond the fog of war. I think it works better in the context of the game, too. Your civilisation has no idea what's out there, but they gradually expand etc. I think it also makes becoming sea-faring that much more of an important step.
Knowing teh terrain before hand gives you a strategic knowledge that sometimes it's fun to have to earn. Also games with procedurally generated terrain seem to, at least to me, keep the game from going stale as fast.
I'm still waiting for a game with the Niagara falls in it how cool would it be to go down it on canoe or something.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment