• 82 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dark_moolahs
#1 Posted by Dark_Moolahs (15 posts) -

So I've been told that inbreeding results in pretty bad offsprings. Generally speaking, inbreeding is not good. But aren't we all(every single human being on this planet) descended from a man and a woman? That means there were only 2 people in the beginning. These 2 people breed and out we came. So doesn't this mean we have been inbreeding from the start?

Avatar image for drebin_893
#2 Posted by Drebin_893 (3176 posts) -

No one can argue with this man's science.

Avatar image for hitchenson
#3 Posted by Hitchenson (4708 posts) -

Amazing.

Avatar image for dark_moolahs
#4 Posted by Dark_Moolahs (15 posts) -

What? Does this mean they were different types of humans from the start?

Avatar image for penguindust
#5 Posted by PenguinDust (12994 posts) -

You're forgetting about the aliens, man. I saw it on the History Channel. Aliens got up and biz-zay with the humans to make babies.

Avatar image for inkerman
#6 Posted by inkerman (1493 posts) -

There was no definitive 'start' of homo sapiens as a species, rather a population of homo erectus gradually changed from the usual population, and eventual an individual we could call the first 'true' homo sapien born into this transitory group, and able to breed with them, producing the next generation, and so on and so forth until the transient group became the homo sapiens we recognise today. There was no 'adam and eve' style situation. 
 
However, we are all interrelated to one another at various stages of our ancestry.

Avatar image for andrewb
#7 Posted by AndrewB (7814 posts) -

Wait, this isn't the Giant Bomb Seaserpent...

Avatar image for imsh_pl
#8 Posted by imsh_pl (4207 posts) -

@Dark_Moolahs said:

So I've been told that inbreeding results in pretty bad offsprings. Generally speaking, inbreeding is not good. But aren't we all(every single human being on this planet) descended from a man and a woman? That means there were only 2 people in the beginning. These 2 people breed and out we came. So doesn't this mean we have been inbreeding from the start?

That's not really how evolution works... there were no 'first two humans', because evolution is a gradual and group phenomenon.

But yeah, we are all related, more or less.

Avatar image for incapability
#9 Posted by Incapability (244 posts) -

Someone call the science department, we have a problem on our hands.

Avatar image for video_game_king
#10 Posted by Video_Game_King (36564 posts) -

I'm guessing he read about the genetic Adam and Eve and thought they existed at the same time.

Avatar image for rattle618
#11 Posted by Rattle618 (1505 posts) -

Nice try, but you are not fooling anyone with this "we" business. This is clearly an extraterrestrial lifeform attempting to get vital information on us, tell him nothing.

Avatar image for omegachosen
#12 Edited by OmegaChosen (658 posts) -

If you believe in the Adam and Eve origin, sure.

Lilith tends to skews things in that scenario though.

Avatar image for alexandersheen
#13 Posted by AlexanderSheen (5150 posts) -

@Rattle618 said:

Nice try, but you are not fooling anyone with this "we" business. This is clearly an extraterrestrial lifeform attempting to get vital information on us, tell him nothing.

*Calling XCOM*

Avatar image for brodehouse
#14 Posted by Brodehouse (10827 posts) -

Do more science, sir. It will serve you far better than religious dogma.

Unless you're talking about Mitochondrial Eve, which in itself you merely have to look at how a family tree works.

Avatar image for rollingzeppelin
#15 Posted by RollingZeppelin (2429 posts) -

Just for the record, inbreeding can be bad because the whole group starts to share the same genes, so if the progenitor has a weakness like getting cataracts and going blind at an early age, then almost everyone in the group will have the same problem. If it's a one time thing, having a child with all kinds of birth defects and less intelligence is just a likely for non-related parents. The main reason it's not accepted is because it's against our society's morals, which is a good thing in the end because genetic diversity strengthens the species.

Avatar image for themanwithnoplan
#16 Posted by TheManWithNoPlan (7008 posts) -

< It's like......We're ALL connected Maaaaannnn >
Avatar image for cmblasko
#17 Posted by cmblasko (2386 posts) -

Human stat points are usually balanced out compared to other races. That makes them an ideal jack-of-all-trades for those who don't want to commit to a specific set of abilities. In most cases, humans are both the dominant and most populous race in the world.

Online
Avatar image for kaiserreich
#18 Posted by Kaiserreich (895 posts) -

We're all like brothers and sisters maaaaan.

Avatar image for morrow
#19 Posted by Morrow (1870 posts) -

I wonder if he's a troll or really believes bible shit.

I hope he's a troll.

Avatar image for firepaw
#20 Posted by Firepaw (3053 posts) -

The bible is full of weird shit, considering that Adam and Eve only had sons, they had to be boning their mother pretty hard too.

Avatar image for sargus
#21 Posted by Sargus (776 posts) -

This thread doesn't need to be an attack on religion, guys. You can still answer his question by saying "Yes, inbreeding was kinda a thing back in ye olden days." Even Biblical scholars will say as much.

Avatar image for brodehouse
#22 Posted by Brodehouse (10827 posts) -
@cmblasko

Human stat points are usually balanced out compared to other races. That makes them an ideal jack-of-all-trades for those who don't want to commit to a specific set of abilities. In most cases, humans are both the dominant and most populous race in the world.

Humans are the standard by which all races of the galaxy are judged by.
Avatar image for brodehouse
#23 Posted by Brodehouse (10827 posts) -
@Sargus

This thread doesn't need to be an attack on religion, guys. You can still answer his question by saying "Yes, inbreeding was kinda a thing back in ye olden days." Even Biblical scholars will say as much.

His question is "If everyone was born from two people, was there a lot of inbreeding?"

The scientific answer MUST refute the original presupposition that 'everyone was born from two people' due to it being factually incorrect. It is impossible to answer the question if the presupposition is causal, and factually incorrect.

Consider the question "Since the moon and sun are the same size, is that why they are the same size in the sky?" To even speak an answer, the presupposition must be refuted as factually wrong.

Your answer, that we should just say yes, says that we must accept an incorrect presupposition and then agree with him based on those grounds, because... Why? It's the nicer thing to do?
Avatar image for video_game_king
#24 Posted by Video_Game_King (36564 posts) -

@Village_Guy:

To be fair, the Bible actually addresses this plot hole.

"Hey, Seth. We're your nameless sisters. Let's fuck."

*they fuck*

"OK, bye."

Avatar image for starvinggamer
#25 Posted by StarvingGamer (11360 posts) -

@Brodehouse said:

@Sargus

This thread doesn't need to be an attack on religion, guys. You can still answer his question by saying "Yes, inbreeding was kinda a thing back in ye olden days." Even Biblical scholars will say as much.

His question is "If everyone was born from two people, was there a lot of inbreeding?" The scientific answer MUST refute the original presupposition that 'everyone was born from two people' due to it being factually incorrect. It is impossible to answer the question if the presupposition is causal, and factually incorrect. Consider the question "Since the moon and sun are the same size, is that why they are the same size in the sky?" To even speak an answer, the presupposition must be refuted as factually wrong. Your answer, that we should just say yes, says that we must accept an incorrect presupposition and then agree with him based on those grounds, because... Why? It's the nicer thing to do?

Hahaha, I don't know why but this post is making me laugh. It's probably the juxtaposition of the inanity of this thread and the intelligent earnestness of your reply.

Avatar image for rachelepithet
#26 Edited by rachelepithet (1646 posts) -

.

Avatar image for haltiamreptar
#27 Posted by HaltIamReptar (2038 posts) -

@Brodehouse said:

@cmblasko

Human stat points are usually balanced out compared to other races. That makes them an ideal jack-of-all-trades for those who don't want to commit to a specific set of abilities. In most cases, humans are both the dominant and most populous race in the world.

Humans are the standard by which all races of the galaxy are judged by.

Though humans thrive best in narrow environmental conditions, they adapt well to a wide range of climates. Humans have a high natural diplomacy check.

Avatar image for shagge
#28 Posted by ShaggE (8396 posts) -

@boocreepyfootdoctor said:

So where do Cain and Abel factor in? Is The Undertaker the spirit of Able. And if "The spirit of the Undertaker lives within the soul of all Mankind" that means we are all related to Cactus Jack? #incest

Dude Love, actually. And since the Bible condemns Dude Love, that explains original sin.

Avatar image for animasta
#29 Posted by Animasta (14903 posts) -

@ShaggE said:

@boocreepyfootdoctor said:

So where do Cain and Abel factor in? Is The Undertaker the spirit of Able. And if "The spirit of the Undertaker lives within the soul of all Mankind" that means we are all related to Cactus Jack? #incest

Dude Love, actually. And since the Bible condemns Dude Love, that explains original sin.

yeah but what happens when he's just mick foley?

Avatar image for lexyz123
#30 Posted by lexyz123 (18 posts) -

Hmm there is a very respected theory, one that says the origin of our species comes from 1 singular female specimen, and that her DNA can be traced so far as the origins of mankind, and we all have a trace of this gal´s DNA in our own code, interesting stuff to be sure, still maybe a possibility...

Avatar image for shagge
#31 Posted by ShaggE (8396 posts) -

@Animasta said:

@ShaggE said:

@boocreepyfootdoctor said:

So where do Cain and Abel factor in? Is The Undertaker the spirit of Able. And if "The spirit of the Undertaker lives within the soul of all Mankind" that means we are all related to Cactus Jack? #incest

Dude Love, actually. And since the Bible condemns Dude Love, that explains original sin.

yeah but what happens when he's just mick foley?

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for paulwade1984
#32 Posted by paulwade1984 (493 posts) -

I have flushed entire civilizations down the toilet. Just think about that. Obviously I am God.

Avatar image for animasta
#33 Posted by Animasta (14903 posts) -

@ShaggE said:

@Animasta said:

@ShaggE said:

@boocreepyfootdoctor said:

So where do Cain and Abel factor in? Is The Undertaker the spirit of Able. And if "The spirit of the Undertaker lives within the soul of all Mankind" that means we are all related to Cactus Jack? #incest

Dude Love, actually. And since the Bible condemns Dude Love, that explains original sin.

yeah but what happens when he's just mick foley?

No Caption Provided

it all makes sense now

Avatar image for spoonman671
#34 Posted by Spoonman671 (5766 posts) -

Guys guys guys!

Shut your face.

Avatar image for razorlution
#35 Posted by Razorlution (212 posts) -

So...there's still people who think like this in the world?

Avatar image for christoffer
#36 Posted by Christoffer (2325 posts) -

I don't think single cell organisms could be called "a man and a woman".

Avatar image for brodehouse
#37 Posted by Brodehouse (10827 posts) -
@HaltIamReptar

@Brodehouse said:

@cmblasko

Human stat points are usually balanced out compared to other races. That makes them an ideal jack-of-all-trades for those who don't want to commit to a specific set of abilities. In most cases, humans are both the dominant and most populous race in the world.

Humans are the standard by which all races of the galaxy are judged by.

Though humans thrive best in narrow environmental conditions, they adapt well to a wide range of climates. Humans have a high natural diplomacy check.

Humans are eligible to take the Human Perseverance feat, giving a +1 bonus to all saving throws.


@StarvingGamer I do aim to please!
Avatar image for pr1mus
#38 Posted by pr1mus (4158 posts) -

@TheManWithNoPlan:

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for scooper
#39 Posted by Scooper (7920 posts) -
Loading Video...
Avatar image for tmthomsen
#40 Posted by TMThomsen (2080 posts) -

@lexyz123 said:

Hmm there is a very respected theory, one that says the origin of our species comes from 1 singular female specimen, and that her DNA can be traced so far as the origins of mankind, and we all have a trace of this gal´s DNA in our own code, interesting stuff to be sure, still maybe a possibility...

What are you even talking about?

Avatar image for smilingpig
#41 Posted by SmilingPig (1370 posts) -

I would hook up with one of my cousins if it would mean saving the human race, or guarantying that my DNA lives on, or if I would be really drunk, or if she would be unconscious and I would be fairly certain that she would stay that way... I am only human!

Avatar image for thehumandove
#42 Posted by TheHumanDove (2520 posts) -

Dollar goes in, soda comes out. You can't explain that!

Avatar image for scooper
#43 Edited by Scooper (7920 posts) -

@TMThomsen said:

@lexyz123 said:

Hmm there is a very respected theory, one that says the origin of our species comes from 1 singular female specimen, and that her DNA can be traced so far as the origins of mankind, and we all have a trace of this gal´s DNA in our own code, interesting stuff to be sure, still maybe a possibility...

What are you even talking about?

There is some evidence that our entire population once dwindled in size to maybe a couple hundred people on the east coast of Africa due to a horrible climatic change, probably from a volcanic eruption somewhere in Indonesia. We know that everyone who isn't African (or those who's recent ancestry are) all probably descended from a small handfull of Africans that managed to escape Africa some 70 thousand or so years ago. So it's not impossible that a few women gave birth to the humans that went on to populate all of the rest of the world. (ps. those facts and numbers are vague bit of my memory so they're probably not entirely accurate so I suggest spending a little time researching it because it's very interesting).

Avatar image for laszlokovacs
#44 Posted by LaszloKovacs (1272 posts) -

I AM A COLLECTION OF ORGANIC MOLECULES NAMED VINCE MCMAHON

Avatar image for tmthomsen
#45 Edited by TMThomsen (2080 posts) -

@Scooper: Yeah, we're basically all Africans. I was simply stumbled by the claim that the entire human species could be tracked back to 1 single woman.

Sure you aren't mixing things up? This article mentions nothing about a our species getting close to extinction.

Avatar image for brodehouse
#46 Posted by Brodehouse (10827 posts) -
@TMThomsen

@lexyz123 said:

Hmm there is a very respected theory, one that says the origin of our species comes from 1 singular female specimen, and that her DNA can be traced so far as the origins of mankind, and we all have a trace of this gal´s DNA in our own code, interesting stuff to be sure, still maybe a possibility...

What are you even talking about?

He's referring to Mitochondrial Eve, but he is mistaken on a couple fronts.

Mitochondrial Eve does not represent 'the origin of the species', she represents the nearest common genetic ancestor of extant humanity. In the same way that you may have a cousin four times removed from a vastly different branch of your family, but connect at your great-great-great-grandmother, Mitochondrial Eve represents the connection of humanity thousands of thousands upon thousands of times removed.
Avatar image for scooper
#47 Posted by Scooper (7920 posts) -

@TMThomsen said:

@Scooper: Yeah, we're basically all Africans. I was simply stumbled by the claim that the entire human species (Homo Erectus) could be tracked back to 1 single woman.

Also, I wouldn't say there is "evidence" of our species ever dwindling down to a couple hundred people. Hypotheses perhaps, but not evidence.

I'd say that genetic evidence isn't bad evidence. But yeah, it's no absolute and has much room to move about, but that's the joy :)

Avatar image for brodehouse
#48 Posted by Brodehouse (10827 posts) -
@TheHumanDove

Dollar goes in, soda comes out. You can't explain that!

Well how did the fountain get there? How'd it get there?!
Avatar image for daneian
#49 Posted by Daneian (1308 posts) -

We have, like, mutations, man.

Avatar image for carousel
#50 Posted by Carousel (421 posts) -

how can the bible be a lie when God wrote it?