WSS, Clinton was a very good president. I'm saying this as a center-right person, Clinton did a great job. The impeachment wasn't due to policy, it was due to politics.
Quit Praising Obama and Blaming Bush!
Why_So_Serious said:
"iAmJohn said:so it's ok to say the clinton administration didnt leave bush shit, but tie me to a tree and beat me with a shoe if i say the bush administration left us in a far worst posistion."Stop blaming Bush for squandering the multibillion dollar surplus that the Clinton administration left him? Uh... okay dude."The Clinton administration didn't leave Bush shit. I don't know where your coming from. Clinton was almost impeached and he was one of the worst presidents we have had. If there was a surplus it sure as hell wasn't cause of that fucktard."
simple numbers:
Clinton left office with a $127billion surplus.
Bush left office with a $450 billion deficit, and this number doesnt include what we spent in iraq.
just saying...
"Why_So_Serious said:Aside from a neat little debate, I can't believe that this thread has been going on for this long with statements that are this phenomenally insulting. This isn't up for debate anymore. Iraq had nothing to do with Bin Ladin or 9/11. End of story."Lies said:9/11 didn't force him to invade Iraq. Invading Iraq was a huge mistake and is one of the reasons why I really thought he did an awful job as president. I don't blame him completely for our economic crisis. I blame the banks for giving bad loans out.""Right. Because the September 11th attacks were responsible for every single one of Bush's bad decisions.Every one.He has no responsibility for his own actions. It's all Bin Laden's fault.That makes sense."No but because of 9/11 he was forced to make decisions that never would have been made otherwise."
"Wolverine said:I know 9/11 had nothing to do with Iraq. That was the point I was trying to make in my post. I just phrased it wrong."Why_So_Serious said:Aside from a neat little debate, I can't believe that this thread has been going on for this long with statements that are this phenomenally insulting. This isn't up for debate anymore. Iraq had nothing to do with Bin Ladin or 9/11. End of story.""Lies said:9/11 didn't force him to invade Iraq. Invading Iraq was a huge mistake and is one of the reasons why I really thought he did an awful job as president. I don't blame him completely for our economic crisis. I blame the banks for giving bad loans out.""Right. Because the September 11th attacks were responsible for every single one of Bush's bad decisions.Every one.He has no responsibility for his own actions. It's all Bin Laden's fault.That makes sense."No but because of 9/11 he was forced to make decisions that never would have been made otherwise."
"vidiot said:You're fine Wolverine, I got that across. I'm just still taken aback that they're still people that honestly believe that 9/11 had anything connected to Iraq. The circulation of information on this subject has been so dense and informative to think that people still correlate the two seriously rightfully disturbs me."Wolverine said:I know 9/11 had with Iraq. That was the point I was trying to make in my post. I just praised it wrong.""Why_So_Serious said:Aside from a neat little debate, I can't believe that this thread has been going on for this long with statements that are this phenomenally insulting. This isn't up for debate anymore. Iraq had nothing to do with Bin Ladin or 9/11. End of story.""Lies said:9/11 didn't force him to invade Iraq. Invading Iraq was a huge mistake and is one of the reasons why I really thought he did an awful job as president. I don't blame him completely for our economic crisis. I blame the banks for giving bad loans out.""Right. Because the September 11th attacks were responsible for every single one of Bush's bad decisions.Every one.He has no responsibility for his own actions. It's all Bin Laden's fault.That makes sense."No but because of 9/11 he was forced to make decisions that never would have been made otherwise."
Then again, now looking back into this thread...I'm just...wow...Did you read the bit about slave camps? I mean...wow
I think you are right about people thinking Obama is god when he isn't. But still, he is facing difficult times and there is still more to come. Obviously things will get worse before they get right; hence having a bigger deficit is not too strange in my opinion. Bush and every single politician in the world ignored the crisis; everyone knew it was going to happen but they ignored it as everyone was buying crazy without any economic reinforcement and the construction companies where building crazy without any future expectations what so ever. All of that was not real and now we are paying for it. Bush ignored it, now Obama is trying to fix it. But don’t get me wrong, I think Obama is as good as any other politician can get.
About the war, that was not the way to get into it. You can’t get in a war lying and using strategies that break every single treaty of humanity, that is not a democracy.
"About the war, that was not the way to get into it. You can’t get in a war lying and using strategies that break every single treaty of humanity, that is not a democracy."Alright, I'm going to start calling people out on what they say, you're first. Aside from going against the better wishes of the UN, what treaties were broken and how is it not democracy?
"Ok so people are really really stupid you know. Everyone blames Bush for our defecit. Now I ask one thing from the trolls that can't listen for one second, listen to me before you post a random comment. I'm not saying Obama is wrong but Bush never had a chance. Is it his fault that we had one of the biggest tragedies during his office in US History? He never had a chance to do what he wanted. He was to busy trying to clean up the mess the terrorists caused us. The reason he spent that money was to rebuild from the loss. And YES we needed to be at war. We are a nation that can't be pushed aside. We were founded on good principles from some of the greatest men ever.Even if everyone forgot about everything that went wrong that Bush didn't have control of, He was STILL a terrible president. I don't think anyone blames Bush for 9/11, that would be stupid. What they do blame him for is his actions following 9/11, and Katrina and everything else (rightfully so). Face it, he's a screw up and I cannot believe he could be elected twice. People are a bunch of sheep.Our founding fathers are rolling over in the graves because of judgemental people who blame others for things that AREN'T their fault. I would also like to point out in the 60 days Obama has been in office he has trippled(sp?) the amount of defecit we are in. Bush exited with $3.3 trillion of defecit and with all the bills Obama has passed in 60 days he has caused up to $9.9 trillion in defecit. How do you think the rest of his 4 years will be? So don't give me shit that this isn't true cause its been proved. NO I DON'T have a link. It was on the news not some internet article. So before you blame someone get your damn facts straight. Once again this is not a shot at Obama just I'm tired of people getting blamed for stuff they had no control over. In politics, school, real life, etc. It's not fair to them."
"i find it amusing how everyone critizes the president for doing a shitty job, but don't have the balls to admit they couldn't do any better. America is hipacracy"
I am generally not a spelling/grammar Nazi, and I hate to contribute to bumping this thread, but those were some fantastic misspellings, sir. Well done.
It fucking sucks that what ever happens in the U.S. has to affect us here in Canada. I think Obama is a fresh face for the states and he could potentally be the one that brings bin laden down and helps to save the economy. Then again, I could be wrong.
"Ok so people are really really stupid you know. Everyone blames Bush for our defecit. Now I ask one thing from the trolls that can't listen for one second, listen to me before you post a random comment. I'm not saying Obama is wrong but Bush never had a chance. Is it his fault that we had one of the biggest tragedies during his office in US History? He never had a chance to do what he wanted. He was to busy trying to clean up the mess the terrorists caused us. The reason he spent that money was to rebuild from the loss. And YES we needed to be at war. We are a nation that can't be pushed aside. We were founded on good principles from some of the greatest men ever.Dude thats just the way liberals are. Bush was a bad President even before he took office. If you remember he went down to Florida and stole the election lol.Our founding fathers are rolling over in the graves because of judgemental people who blame others for things that AREN'T their fault. I would also like to point out in the 60 days Obama has been in office he has trippled(sp?) the amount of defecit we are in. Bush exited with $3.3 trillion of defecit and with all the bills Obama has passed in 60 days he has caused up to $9.9 trillion in defecit. How do you think the rest of his 4 years will be? So don't give me shit that this isn't true cause its been proved. NO I DON'T have a link. It was on the news not some internet article. So before you blame someone get your damn facts straight. Once again this is not a shot at Obama just I'm tired of people getting blamed for stuff they had no control over. In politics, school, real life, etc. It's not fair to them."
he told me not to put a random comment so now i have to do it,
I love black people, all of you.
but on a serious note american politics is corrupt as is any to be honest, however The U.S do politics based on image and i don't understand that, to be frankly honest if the U.S was faced with the best politician in the world, and he was in running to become president because of his personal image and how he is percived by the public they wouldn't get voted in,
"As history dictates democracy is a theory, one which will never be realised, until all power is removed from leadership, but then what would being a leader mean?" James Quinn
"eclipsesis: Prove to me that American politics is corrupt as you say. At the federal level, please."
Dude i can't, and im not saying i can, But if you look back i said "as is any" meaning any form of politics not just the U.S, if i was to say something tho i would proberbly say, well how can you explain the occurance where some dude won presidency by loads then they had a recount and it suddenly showed tht bush won. tht seemed weird
"BoG said:It's not the first time a recount changed the results, either. Last year, a recount put Al Franken over Norm Coleman though initial projections showed otherwise. However, the recount didn't change things for Bush, that election was decided in a Supreme Court case, it's a very unusual election. The Electoral College was won by Bush as well, so though Gore won the popular vote, he lost. It's not an issue of corruption, it's an issue of electoral systems."eclipsesis: Prove to me that American politics is corrupt as you say. At the federal level, please."Dude i can't, and im not saying i can, But if you look back i said "as is any" meaning any form of politics not just the U.S, if i was to say something tho i would proberbly say, well how can you explain the occurance where some dude won presidency by loads then they had a recount and it suddenly showed tht bush won. tht seemed weird"
Thats the dude big Al gore, You seem to be missing the inherant problem with politics or at least what i beleive and meny others do. Political systems used Democracy,communisim and so on. carry with with them inherant corruption, this can be seen through all history, in the miss use in power, For example adolf hitler, richard nixon in a interview with david frost, richard nixon once said "When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal." he beleievd himself to be above the law this is a form of corruption maybe at the lowest of levels but its their, My point is that you can't make pure, something that is already corrupt.
"Shallimus said:Yep, I asked for federal level. That's Illinois, which has been described as a very corrupt state. So I'm not being a dick by criticizing all of you for not backing up what you say and not backing up what I say, here you go:"BoG said:That's not federal.""eclipsesis: Prove to me that American politics is corrupt as you say. At the federal level, please."Blagojevich. Senate seat."
"eclipsesis: Prove to me that American politics is corrupt as you say. At the federal level, please."How about Dick Cheney and Halliburton?
"BoG said:Good one. Better considering that Cheney is perhaps the most powerful V.P. in U.S. history, and their involvement in Iraq. I suggest you read this, however."eclipsesis: Prove to me that American politics is corrupt as you say. At the federal level, please."How about Dick Cheney and Halliburton?"
"angelkanarias said:Ok. Lying to your own people saying there are ''weapons of mass destruction'' isn't widely accpeted between the democratic countries. I can also tell you torture, kidnapping within other countries and spying your own people doesn't either fit within democratic countries nor in international treaties. Oh, and I also think killing your own people by letting terrorist attacks happen in your own soil is everything but democratic. But anyways, it has always happened. Pearl harbor and the spanish war are just two examples of lies and manipulations to enter profitable wars."About the war, that was not the way to get into it. You can’t get in a war lying and using strategies that break every single treaty of humanity, that is not a democracy."Alright, I'm going to start calling people out on what they say, you're first. Aside from going against the better wishes of the UN, what treaties were broken and how is it not democracy?"
"BoG said:"angelkanarias said:Ok. Lying to your own people saying there are ''weapons of mass destruction'' isn't widely accpeted between the democratic countries. I can also tell you torture, kidnapping within other countries and spying your own people doesn't either fit within democratic countries nor in international treaties. Oh, and I also think killing your own people by letting terrorist attacks happen in your own soil is everything but democratic. But anyways, it has always happened. Pearl harbor and the spanish war are just two examples of lies and manipulation to enter a profitable war.""About the war, that was not the way to get into it. You can’t get in a war lying and using strategies that break every single treaty of humanity, that is not a democracy."Alright, I'm going to start calling people out on what they say, you're first. Aside from going against the better wishes of the UN, what treaties were broken and how is it not democracy?"
Well, BoG, some historians seem to believe that the Roosevelt Administration did know what was to happen. American Cryptology had advanced to the point of knowing what Japanese negotiators were going to demand before they knew it themselves. Is it such a stretch to think they could have intercepted and decrypted war plans too?
And if it did happen in WW2, it wouldn't be the last time the U.S. went to war under false pretenses. Remember the Gulf of Tonkin incident?
"angelkanarias said:"BoG said:"angelkanarias said:Ok. Lying to your own people saying there are ''weapons of mass destruction'' isn't widely accpeted between the democratic countries. I can also tell you torture, kidnapping within other countries and spying your own people doesn't either fit within democratic countries nor in international treaties. Oh, and I also think killing your own people by letting terrorist attacks happen in your own soil is everything but democratic. But anyways, it has always happened. Pearl harbor and the spanish war are just two examples of lies and manipulation to enter a profitable war.""About the war, that was not the way to get into it. You can’t get in a war lying and using strategies that break every single treaty of humanity, that is not a democracy."Alright, I'm going to start calling people out on what they say, you're first. Aside from going against the better wishes of the UN, what treaties were broken and how is it not democracy?"1. They didn't know. Some advisers disagreed, but Bush went in thinking there were weapons. Link.2. That's why both McCain and Obama vowed to end torture in the campaign. The USA PATRIOT Act was a mistake that congress made in heat of 9/11. No one disagrees with you here.3. I'm not even going to humor this ridiculous conspiracy theory.
1. If the CIA, the most important intelligence agency in the world, makes those mistakes, then the government should be thinking about closing it down.
3. Please read your history. This wouldn't be the first time the US government made up an excuse or ignored something to enter war. The US government has admitted the USS Maine was not destroyed by the Spanish, never the less; they accused the Spanish of doing it to enter war with them. And no one can say the alerts of an attack to Pearl Harbor where at least ignored. I can also add the government had an isolationism policy during WWII, but guess what, war is profitable, and that is undeniable.
Oh, and the torture and kidnapping was not democratic the las time I checked.
"Where do people get the information that Clinton left office with a surplus? We haven't been out of debt in a loooooong time."Exactly, whatever he left us wasn't his doing he just got lucky and was left with "technically" a surplus but most of it wasn't cause of him. He didn't contribute the much to our economic state. He didn't hurt us but he didn't help either. Not that that is a bad thing cause its not. But give credit were credit is due and he shouldn't be given credit.
"BoG said:I cited my source. Would you be so kind as to do the same?"angelkanarias said:"BoG said:"angelkanarias said:Ok. Lying to your own people saying there are ''weapons of mass destruction'' isn't widely accpeted between the democratic countries. I can also tell you torture, kidnapping within other countries and spying your own people doesn't either fit within democratic countries nor in international treaties. Oh, and I also think killing your own people by letting terrorist attacks happen in your own soil is everything but democratic. But anyways, it has always happened. Pearl harbor and the spanish war are just two examples of lies and manipulation to enter a profitable war.""About the war, that was not the way to get into it. You can’t get in a war lying and using strategies that break every single treaty of humanity, that is not a democracy."Alright, I'm going to start calling people out on what they say, you're first. Aside from going against the better wishes of the UN, what treaties were broken and how is it not democracy?"1. They didn't know. Some advisers disagreed, but Bush went in thinking there were weapons. Link.2. That's why both McCain and Obama vowed to end torture in the campaign. The USA PATRIOT Act was a mistake that congress made in heat of 9/11. No one disagrees with you here.3. I'm not even going to humor this ridiculous conspiracy theory.1. If the CIA, the most important intelligence agency in the world, makes those mistakes, then the government should be thinking about closing it down.
3. Please read your history. This wouldn't be the first time the US government made up an excuse or ignored something to enter war. The US government has admitted the USS Maine was not destroyed by the Spanish, never the less; they accused the Spanish of doing it to enter war with them. And no one can say the alerts of an attack to Pearl Harbor where at least ignored. I can also add the government had an isolationism policy during WWII, but guess what, war is profitable, and that is undeniable.
Oh, and the torture and kidnapping was not democratic the las time I checked.
"
"JazzyJeff said:Just to add to that The U.S went into debt ages ago, TBH they went beyond debt its somewhere in the trillion mark and its never going to get paid back, because it not real it fake digital money, basicly numbers in a bank account."Where do people get the information that Clinton left office with a surplus? We haven't been out of debt in a loooooong time."Exactly, whatever he left us wasn't his doing he just got lucky and was left with "technically" a surplus but most of it wasn't cause of him. He didn't contribute the much to our economic state. He didn't hurt us but he didn't help either. Not that that is a bad thing cause its not. But give credit were credit is due and he shouldn't be given credit."
How is digital money any different in value than paper? They back up the digital money with a printing press, being digital is irrelevant.
"JazzyJeff said:"Where do people get the information that Clinton left office with a surplus? We haven't been out of debt in a loooooong time."Exactly, whatever he left us wasn't his doing he just got lucky and was left with "technically" a surplus but most of it wasn't cause of him. He didn't contribute the much to our economic state. He didn't hurt us but he didn't help either. Not that that is a bad thing cause its not. But give credit were credit is due and he shouldn't be given credit."
JazzyJeff said:
"Where do people get the information that Clinton left office with a surplus? We haven't been out of debt in a loooooong time."I wasn't going to bump this demon-spawn of a topic, but since the Anarchist has done it for me, i suppose I might as well do BoG a favor and prove you wrong for him. There was indeed a surplus at the end of Clintons term, and it was a big one. Clinton is not blameless in the financial meltdown. In fact, he had a lot to do with it, including removing many of the restrictions placed on banks and financial institutions that had been in place since the Great Depression, designed to keep financial experts honest. But Bush did in fact turn a surplus into a defecit.
I'll do ya one better here.
"r0k1ll said:It certainly wouldnt be Why So Serious, because he didn't just comment on 2 of said users threads in a row... without commenting on any others..."shuttup you stupid conservatives (jk)"Can one of you mods find out which user account r0k1ll uses as his "main account," and ban it for continually bumping an old topic with nothing new to add?"
"TooWalrus said:Ha, I missed that, boo, hiss!"r0k1ll said:It certainly wouldnt be Why So Serious, because he didn't just comment on 2 of said users threads in a row... without commenting on any others...""shuttup you stupid conservatives (jk)"Can one of you mods find out which user account r0k1ll uses as his "main account," and ban it for continually bumping an old topic with nothing new to add?"
Why don't we just wait until Obama's term is over, then we can judge him, ok unoriginal screen name?
Are you missing the fact how everyone has realized Obama sucks? Honestly, just pay attention more, half the people are saying he sucks.
A billion dollars? To that? No, you can't be serious.
"Are you missing the fact how everyone has realized Obama sucks? Honestly, just pay attention more, half the people are saying he sucks. A billion dollars? To that? No, you can't be serious. "Really Smug? A fact? Because half the people are saying he sucks? Like there are two opposite sides that don't agree with each other? That's a pretty bold statement.
I agree with whysoserious, but Bush didn't help us at all. I'm not blaming him for anything, but I'm dissappointed that he didn't do much to *start political anlyst voice* fix the economy.
"Why don't we just wait until Obama's term is over, then we can judge him, ok unoriginal screen name?"Is that how it works? We wait till presidents destroy the nation, and we sit by and watch suspending all judgements until his term is over? Come on...
"AgentJ said:I never said that he "brought us out of debt, and that wasn't what was said in the post that started all of this either. But he DID leave office with a surplus. The site that you linked only talks about PUBLIC debt, which is the debt that the people live in this country are in. That refers to loans and borrowed money and such, and has nothing to do with the government. Why dont you get the right website next time."Why_So_Serious said:A surplus in the fiscal budget doesn't equate to Clinton bringing us out of debt. There were a few periods during Clinton's time in office where he had a surplus in the budget, but overall, he drove us deeper in the hole. Please go to this site and punch in Clinton's dates (Jan 20, 1993 - 2001)."JazzyJeff said:"Where do people get the information that Clinton left office with a surplus? We haven't been out of debt in a loooooong time."Exactly, whatever he left us wasn't his doing he just got lucky and was left with "technically" a surplus but most of it wasn't cause of him. He didn't contribute the much to our economic state. He didn't hurt us but he didn't help either. Not that that is a bad thing cause its not. But give credit were credit is due and he shouldn't be given credit."
JazzyJeff said:"Where do people get the information that Clinton left office with a surplus? We haven't been out of debt in a loooooong time."I wasn't going to bump this demon-spawn of a topic, but since the Anarchist has done it for me, i suppose I might as well do BoG a favor and prove you wrong for him. There was indeed a surplus at the end of Clintons term, and it was a big one. Clinton is not blameless in the financial meltdown. In fact, he had a lot to do with it, including removing many of the restrictions placed on banks and financial institutions that had been in place since the Great Depression, designed to keep financial experts honest. But Bush did in fact turn a surplus into a defecit."
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=npI'm sick of people not knowing the facts, or interpreting them incorrectly. Please do your own homework and stop listening to the media, which is almost always slanted in one direction or the other. Anyone who knows anything about this shit knows Clinton left office with a 5.7 Trillion dollar debt."
Please Log In to post.

Log in to comment