see above
Should Linux be a considered Platform?
itinfect999 said:
"there aren't enough (if any?) titles exclusive to Linux, nor enough development for it, nor enough users for it to really be considered a platform. yet."I disagree about 'not enough users' thing, I know plenty of gamers who run linux - usually dual boot with windows to be able to play DirectX10 games
"itinfect999 said:"there aren't enough (if any?) titles exclusive to Linux, nor enough development for it, nor enough users for it to really be considered a platform. yet."I disagree about 'not enough users' thing, I know plenty of gamers who run linux - usually dual boot with windows to be able to play DirectX10 games
"
What I mean is that it's not very mainstream yet.
Well Steve Ballmer considers it communism, so yes it is a platform, a platform for communist computing.
No it's just an OS.
It's the same reason why Windows isn't considered a platform.
I mean I don't see people lumping Xbox, Windows, and Dreamcast together because they all use a Windows OS nor could I imagine people lumping Linux and Playstation 2 and 3 together because of the Linux OS.
"No, it should not.I agree. It doesn't matter if I am running Linux or Windows, the computer itself is exactly the same. Although I would probably put Macs in a separate category even though they are used for personal computer purposes, but that's because of some hardware differences and how it basically separates itself from PC's.
All Operating Systems should be classified under the PC platform. Which, although commonly misused, means "Personal Computer". It's all-encompassing."
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment