The unrelated to the music comment: sorry I missed the first thread. I saw the artist/album title, had no idea what it was, and balked like a coward.
The really short version of the undoubtedly many paragraphs to come: As the years have gone by, I often hear the words "Twilight Sad" and think the sounds of Frightened Rabbit or Future Islands in my head.
Expanded thoughts:
This was a prime time to hold your guitar as close to the amp as possible. But I also get it, without question. This was also a year when In Rainbows, Hissing Fauna, Strawberry Jam and Sound of Silver would arguably stake their claim to the sound(s) of mildly enjoyable rock music for over a decade. Even worse, at the time it did not feel that way! And why would it? These were concept records at worst, message records at best - popular artists young and old feeling the walls of internet message boards and the cities with regular live show assholes closing in on them. If anything, just looking back at this year has me finding newfound empathy for all the parents and silver fox influencer who've held on to music from their high school years. 2007 was my senior year and while I resist it with every fiber of my being, it's pretty clear that many of my peers are gonna ride whatever Spotify's interpretation of "Someone Great" is until they're covered in dirt or stuffed in an urn.
So if and when I try to boast some "I was a music critic from 2008 to 2013" credentials...ask for my papers, please. I'll gladly provide examples of all the ways I dodged having to write about rock music at this time. Compared to the lawlessness of mixtape era hip-hop or mechanical analysis of R&B, then as now criticizing rock music, perhaps most importantly, that which aimed towards being rock music, was and mostly remains a fool's errand (though plenty clever writers still have a good time making rock sound cooler than ever). I don't want it to die because expressive kids who can't play (program?) instruments, draw concept art or grasp the Adobe Creative Suite generally need a suitable and gratifying outlet. The best thing about rock music, from the modernly quaint enthusiasm of the many Black Americans of the '40s and '50s rejecting jazz so the despondent Brits of the '50s and '60s who commercialized it and on to the regional punks like Soul Glo and Black MIDI, is that even if it's not truly dangerous it can feel that way. The grander debt pop music owes to hip-hop, R&B and house, the more potent rock has started to become once again.
But I was glad not to be assigned Twilight Sad at what would've been the very new moon of my dream of music criticism. I mean fuck, Burial's Untrue, El-P's I'll Sleep When You're Dead and World's End Girlfriend's Hurtbreak Wonderland came out in 2007, let alone the four cultural titans I namedropped last paragraph! Perhaps more presciently, The National released Boxer and Spoon released Ga Ga Ga Ga and Bon Iver released For Emma (in the ways the Old Ones once strained to stuff every Neil Young record in a rock capsule, we Young Bastards must accept this record has been played by bands the size of E Street more than it hasn't), M.I.A. released Kala, Arctic Monkeys became a global menace and just for the sake of my self-loathing true shred-heads out there, Pig Destroyer established themselves as a blip on the radar with Phantom Limb.
In other words, I'd be happy to have some kid aged 16 to 50 with a messenger bag full of Apple brand charging cables for their phone, headphones, laptop and watch butt in on my conversation about Wet Leg and ask if I'd ever heard Twilight Sad before. I'd wearily avoid the long, dreary conversational road involving late period Sunny Day Real Estate and other slow but heavy emo bands that are far more relevant to the conversation than... Slowdive ... like Karate, Jawbreaker, Dag Nasty, Texas Is the Reason or Mineral. Because ultimately, a band like Twlight Sad and/or an album like Fourteen Autumns wasn't actually cynically designed to prey on guys like me who'd write a "review" like this understanding that others would fully get why the album itself wasn't, still isn't, worth talking about.
It's perfectly good, enjoyable, non-cynical and could've never expected to be the most generic entry to the canon of its moment. While I might argue there's no reason to like or dislike this album, it's worth nothing that as debut albums go it's baffling in its confidence, that as beginner's guides to a drowned sound it's both comprehensive and alluring, and that anybody who has anything negative to say about this album other than "heard it all before" record store guy-isms or "just not my jam" missives are either being a dick or honest.
6/10 without thinking about it, 7/10 if I still had to answer to editors who'd swap the more flowery language for song descriptions, 9/10 if I were becoming more and more desperate to book the mid-card for a late October festival in the Mediterranean regions of Europe.
Log in to comment