Avatar image for the_atomic_dumpling
#1 Posted by atomic_dumpling (2536 posts) -
Avatar image for fizzy
#2 Posted by Fizzy (379 posts) -

Lol, that's pretty funny :P

Avatar image for mylifeforaiur
#3 Posted by mylifeforAiur (3505 posts) -

What does Stephen Fry think about this heated issue?

Avatar image for gs_dan
#4 Posted by GS_Dan (1435 posts) -

Won't somebody please think of the children, etc.

Avatar image for rolyatkcinmai
#5 Posted by Rolyatkcinmai (2763 posts) -

Land of the free.

Avatar image for firepaw
#6 Posted by Firepaw (3053 posts) -

The idea is fine, but stopping the internet is impossible, they will never be able to block access to all porn sites.

Avatar image for phrosnite
#7 Posted by phrosnite (3519 posts) -

The internet is for porn.

Avatar image for jimi
#8 Posted by jimi (1149 posts) -

This is going to lead to awkward conversations with parents everywhere.

Avatar image for jonnyflash80
#9 Posted by Jonnyflash80 (531 posts) -

It's up to parents to restrict their kid's access to porn, not the ISPs.

Avatar image for contro
#10 Posted by Contro (2346 posts) -

@Jonnyflash80 said:

It's up to parents to restrict their kid's access to porn, not the ISPs.

Agreed.

I knew it wouldn't take long for David Cameron to start enforcing his bullshit driven pro Christian agenda.

Avatar image for lunar_aura
#11 Posted by Lunar_Aura (2824 posts) -

@GS_Dan said:

Won't somebody please think of the children, etc.

ew

Avatar image for wintersnowblind
#12 Posted by WinterSnowblind (7598 posts) -

Down with this sort of thing!

Avatar image for arker101
#13 Edited by Arker101 (1484 posts) -

@Village_Guy said:

The idea is fine, but stopping the internet is impossible, they will never be able to block access to all porn sites.

What if they block Giantbomb? You know what happens if you google

Naked Cartoon Pussy.

Avatar image for firepaw
#14 Posted by Firepaw (3053 posts) -

@Arker101 said:

@Village_Guy said:

The idea is fine, but stopping the internet is impossible, they will never be able to block access to all porn sites.

What if they block Giantbomb? You know what happens if you google

Naked Cartoon Pussy.

Damn you Naked Cartoon Pussy!

Damn you all!

Avatar image for machofantastico
#15 Posted by MachoFantastico (6282 posts) -
Loading Video...

It at to be done (if it hasn't already). :D

Avatar image for the_atomic_dumpling
#16 Edited by atomic_dumpling (2536 posts) -
"Bailey's report asked for government and business to work together on initiatives such as ending the sale of inappropriately "sexy" clothing for young children, for example underwired bras and T-shirts with suggestive slogans." 
 
Suggestive slogans? Like "just do it" or "I'm lovin' it"?
Avatar image for penguindust
#17 Posted by PenguinDust (12994 posts) -

So it seems sex is more dangerous than violence. What a world we live in today.

Avatar image for mikkaq
#18 Posted by MikkaQ (10296 posts) -

Man the next generation up is gonna be a bunch of coddled dorks. Though we're pretty close to that today.

Avatar image for meowshi
#19 Posted by Meowshi (2917 posts) -

@PenguinDust said:

So it seems sex is more dangerous than violence. What a world we live in today.

Well, you're far more likely to engage in one than the other.

Avatar image for zudthespud
#20 Edited by zudthespud (3332 posts) -
Avatar image for vanek
#21 Edited by Vanek (412 posts) -

@Jimi said:

This is going to lead to awkward conversations with parents everywhere.

And also some wives considering some of the people I work with. XD

Seriously though I really don't know what to think, I mean, it probably wont work and it hardly seems like an actual problem that needs to be solved. I also noticed my ISP isn't participating and surely it's a pointless exercise unless all the major ISPs do it?

[EDIT] If it's an opt in service then it makes more sense. That said, I can still see it causing problems and blocking things it maybe shouldn't.

Avatar image for brainspecialist
#22 Posted by BrainSpecialist (575 posts) -

@zudthespud: They've since changed the original article to reflect this.

The problem isn't just that they'll block porn, but anything else they deem pornographic, regardless of whether or not its actually porn.

Avatar image for babblinmule
#23 Edited by babblinmule (1280 posts) -

I'm increasingly starting to despise this current government.....

Avatar image for grissefar
#24 Posted by Grissefar (2904 posts) -

That seems a little desperate and pathetic.

Avatar image for theguy
#25 Edited by theguy (824 posts) -

Hopefully Ireland won't follow suit. The thought of ISP's having a list of "porn watchers" is worrying. Maybe the other ISP's will get more custom from people who value their privacy.

Avatar image for noelveiga
#26 Posted by NoelVeiga (1293 posts) -

You see censorship, I see a great opportunity to make a sales rep hilariously uncomfortable by describing in excruciating detail all the porn sites I want access to.

I'd call that a win/win.

Avatar image for theguy
#27 Posted by theguy (824 posts) -

@zudthespud said:

Guys, it's an opt in service, not an opt out. You need to tell your ISP you don't want porn. The Guardian mixed this up.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15252128

Ah I was a little doubtful when I saw guardian, this makes more sense and is actually a fine idea.

Avatar image for still_i_cry
#28 Posted by Still_I_Cry (2521 posts) -

I was about to have a rant about how grotesque I find porn but then I read:

"@zudthespud said:

Guys, it's an opt in service, not an opt out. You need to tell your ISP you don't want porn. The Guardian mixed this up.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15252128

Ah I was a little doubtful when I saw guardian, this makes more sense and is actually a fine idea."

I don't see anything wrong with ISPs blocking porn sites etc.

Avatar image for suicrat
#29 Posted by Suicrat (3829 posts) -

And just last week I read an article on the BBC World Service expressing sympathy with the job performed by film censors. I'd call it the People's Republic of Britain, but you jackasses haven't guillotined your royal family yet, for some strange reason...

Avatar image for fizzy
#30 Posted by Fizzy (379 posts) -

Doesn't really effect me since I am not with the watching of the porns. If I were of the porn watching group, I would be effected, thus, I would be of the porn watching group mentality. Porn.

Avatar image for shirogane
#31 Posted by Shirogane (3629 posts) -

@XII_Sniper said:

Man the next generation up is gonna be a bunch of coddled dorks. Though we're pretty close to that today.

You mean, there won't be a next generation?

Online
Avatar image for mikkaq
#32 Posted by MikkaQ (10296 posts) -

@Shirogane said:

@XII_Sniper said:

Man the next generation up is gonna be a bunch of coddled dorks. Though we're pretty close to that today.

You mean, there won't be a next generation?

Yeah they won't know how to bone and they'll be lost forever, seeking the ancient secrets of reproduction.

Avatar image for adamsons
#33 Posted by Adamsons (877 posts) -

@NoelVeiga said:

You see censorship, I see a great opportunity to make a sales rep hilariously uncomfortable by describing in excruciating detail all the porn sites I want access to.

I'd call that a win/win.

I like the way you think.

Avatar image for iam3green
#34 Posted by iam3green (14368 posts) -

but the internet is for porn. i can see it now kids are going to have to have an awkward conversation with their parents. kids sex drive are going to be up since they can't get porn anymore. kids start downloading all of the porn that you can. 
  

Avatar image for the_atomic_dumpling
#35 Posted by atomic_dumpling (2536 posts) -
@zudthespud said:

Guys, it's an opt in service, not an opt out. You need to tell your ISP you don't want porn. The Guardian mixed this up.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15252128

Looks like we have conflicting articles now. I am going to guess BBC is right, since I usually trust them more.
Avatar image for alternate
#36 Posted by alternate (2819 posts) -

I don't see the fuss. It is just server side content filters. Don't have kids or don't want restrictions? opt-in or opt-out - whichever actually applies to the scheme. Big deal. Only ppl who should give a damn are 14 year old boys.

Avatar image for gs_dan
#37 Posted by GS_Dan (1435 posts) -

@Lunar_Aura: Dammit Lunar

>_<

Avatar image for crazykill3r93
#38 Posted by CRAzYKiLL3R93 (390 posts) -

I completely support this since it's opt-in. If I had to call my isp to see porn on the other hand there's a problem

Kids will find a way round it though, they always do

Avatar image for the_atomic_dumpling
#39 Posted by atomic_dumpling (2536 posts) -

I suppose you mean the filter is opt-in, not the porn.

Avatar image for dudeglove
#40 Posted by dudeglove (12574 posts) -

Another fine use of taxpayer's money by a feckless British government. "I know why we had all those riots - those kids were all watching Internet porn!Lets focus on tackling a problem that never existed in the first place!"

Avatar image for jadeskye
#41 Posted by Jadeskye (4392 posts) -

I will happily call virgin media and tell them an explicit list of stuff that i'm into. In fact i'll send david cameron an email with that detail.

Remarkably stupid idea really. They should just implement the XXX root domain for sex, it's the best idea and it's easy for parents to prevent that material getting to their kids.

Avatar image for jaketaylor
#42 Posted by jaketaylor (363 posts) -

Yep. I love this country.

Avatar image for apoptosis61
#43 Posted by apoptosis61 (569 posts) -

enjoy your freedom

Avatar image for benjaebe
#44 Edited by benjaebe (2871 posts) -

Wait, people actually have a problem with ISPs offering a porn filter if the customers ask for it? For fucks sake, read the goddamn BBC article guys. Several people have already pointed out that the OP was wrong. It's no different than if you told your cable provider you don't want the naked people channels.

Avatar image for toms115
#45 Posted by Toms115 (2329 posts) -

@benjaebe said:

Wait, people actually have a problem with ISPs offering a porn filter if the customers ask for it? For fucks sake, read the goddamn BBC article guys. Several people have already pointed out that the OP was wrong. It's no different than if you told your cable provider you don't want the naked people channels.

fuck you i like yelling about things

Avatar image for example1013
#46 Posted by Example1013 (4854 posts) -

This is retarded just in principle. The government has no business determining what content is not safe for children.

Avatar image for dagbiker
#47 Posted by Dagbiker (7041 posts) -

Fuck this Naked Cartoon Pussy thing in the Ass.

Avatar image for jack_daniels
#48 Posted by Jack_Daniels (1607 posts) -

Amazon better be blocked too, it sells sex toys. Oh and so should Reddit and Wikipedia.