Unpopular Opinion: Only John Wick #1 was good.

Avatar image for monkeyking1969
MonkeyKing1969

7931

Forum Posts

1241

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 17

#1  Edited By MonkeyKing1969

I actually like only the first John Wick movie. I know unpopular opinion, but it’s true. The first movie was simple, direct and just gave a tiny glimpse at a world that has some rules...but they are not rules to show the underworld has some ‘values’ and structure...so just sit back because it’s still a revenge flick.

However, all the subsequent movies go crazy with the ‘secret society of assassins’ world building - the world has too many rule. You cannot fight or kill here, here or here; but you can fight here on alternate Thursdays after cocktail hour.

... Of course unless otherwise specified by a 'ruling elite' who the anarcho-syndicalist commune you could fight on a Wednesday. Because the elected officers of the ‘secret assassins guild’ take turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. : But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting. By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs,--

SHUT UP!

The world of John Wick is just dumb, because they try to explain it more or fill out the world unnecararrily. What was so wrong with an ex-hit-man comes out of retirement to track down the gangsters that killed his dog and took everything from him? The first rule in the first movie is easy...you don't fuck with someone who was 'made' or part of the system. John was retired, but he was not to be fucked with like civilians (i.e. Common people, normie) - "Organized crime- 101" level stuff. John says, "You gotta fix this" and they say fuck off. So, he kills everyone. However, as soon as the second movie they lay on the "wacky-weird world" on too thick and it ruins the other movies. Suddenly, everyone is a "character” out of a 1990s David Lynch film - it is world building gone amuck. The producers/writers think it is all very clever; but, it is just dumb.

Avatar image for the_greg
The_Greg

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Both of those films are fun. They don't need to be clever to be enjoyed. I wouldn't get so worked up about it, either way.

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

19620

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 14

I agree in that John Wick 1 was a right action movie that made jus enough sense to be fun and not think about it too hard. In contrast I thought John Wick 2 went way too far into that secret society stuff and suit jackets blocking submachine gun fire etc. the sequel definitely had its moments but I do enjoy the first film more.

Avatar image for liquiddragon
liquiddragon

3954

Forum Posts

978

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 16

What if they're all not good?

Avatar image for bladeofcreation
BladeOfCreation

1579

Forum Posts

27

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

I liked the second one more, because of the action and the world-building. To be sure, a secret society of assassins IS absurd (there simply aren't that many assassinations that occur to support such an economy!), but this movie goes for it in a way that's entertaining. The choreography of the fight scenes is just incredible, and that's the main reason I'm here.

Avatar image for deathstriker
Deathstriker

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Isn't there only one other movie besides the first one? The third one isn't out yet. It's not like you're saying there's only one good James Bond or Marvel movie. John Wick is all about the action and style, both are good action movies to me. Both of them helped change and save action scenes from the lame Bourne style that's too close up and has a bunch of cuts.

Avatar image for fear_the_booboo
Fear_the_Booboo

1122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

I found the second one to have a better visual aesthetic. The story’s dumb in both movies but I appreciate the more fantastical take on assassins over just plain Russian gangs and stuff.

The real hot take for me is that John Wick movies are totally fine, better than most even, but in a world where Mad Max: Fury Road or the Raid 2 exist, John Wick is not the second coming of action cinema it was praised to be.

Avatar image for hassun
hassun

10189

Forum Posts

191

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#9  Edited By hassun

Even more unpopular opinion, John Wick 1 is good but not great. What it does have is 2 amazing action sequences. 1 being the home invasion early on and 2 being the entire nightclub sequence from Kevin Nash to Wick walking out the front door. You could add a third if you include the Perkins stuff at the hotel. Nothing after it even comes close to living up to the choreography and style of sequence 2 and the film just kind of peters out.

The second film never even comes close to reaching the peak JW1 reached with sequence 1 or sequence 2 and I don't like the tonal shift the film made to almost full-on video game instead of the mysterious and tacticool stuff from the first film. It's a very different thing. Some people like it, some don't. The climactic action scene in the hall of mirrors was also a letdown.

Sequence 2 from the first film deserves to be in the action film hall of fame though. No question.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for imhungry
imhungry

1205

Forum Posts

1211

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 3

I mean I'll agree that 1 was better than 2 but why are you talking as if there's an entire series of movies that were somehow ruined by 2? There's been 2. You can have the opinion that 2 was worse because of the world building sure but it's pretty hard for a movie to be so bad that it ruins imaginary movies I'd think.

Personally I thought the world building in 2 was great. It is ridiculously dumb and you can tell the writers know it and are leaning into it with the air of complete seriousness. The highs in the second movie were definitely not as high as the first but I wouldn't go as far as calling it bad.

Avatar image for pappafost
pappafost

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I thought it was decent, but the shooting parts in 2 were very silly to me. He's just going to town with 9mms, with a perfect killshot every second, for far too long. Perhaps the best way to describe it is "overly choreographed."

Avatar image for cikame
cikame

3188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The final fight in the first film almost ruins it for me, it makes no sense given the events of the film up to that point and feels like a compromise in order to create some kind of tension.
Similarly it tries to include some tropes from mafia films, namely killing major or otherwise sympathetic characters without hesitation or sometimes reason, which is something i hate.

I definitely like the 2nd film more, but if you're not me i can totally see why you'd enjoy the first more.

Avatar image for killem_dafoe
KillEm_Dafoe

2678

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 6

Yeah, no.

While I find the emotional weight and payoff of the first movie's story to be superior to the story of the second, literally everything else about Chapter 2 is better. The direction, cinematography, sound, and most importantly, the action scenes. Not to mention the expanded world-building is a lot of fun. Who cares if it's silly. That's kind of the idea. It's still INTERESTING and it handily sets itself apart from other action movies because of this. John Wick as a franchise definitely has its own identity, and Chapter 2 solidified what that identity is. I think you think it's trying to take itself more seriously than it really is. If you don't like it, fine, that's on you. But this shit is awesome.

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

15743

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

I agree that the first one is best but I like the second one as well.

The real truth here is that The Raid 1 and 2 are flat-out better action movies. John Wick's action is perfectly executed but too clean and technical, like a tech-death band that can outplay everyone in a hundred mile radius but can't make a fun song to save their lives. Meanwhile, every fight in The Raid seems a little messier, but much more interesting to watch.

Avatar image for uhtaree
uhtaree

951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I didn't even think the first one was worth getting too worked up over, but the second one, while not outwardly terrible, was boring and forgettable and I kept thinking to myself "how are they fucking this up?" Is the third one even out yet....

Avatar image for frytup
frytup

1480

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By frytup

Agreed. They took an implausible but fun action movie concept and made it actively ridiculous in the second movie.

Avatar image for jesus_phish
Jesus_Phish

3995

Forum Posts

3307

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I actually like only the first John Wick movie. I know unpopular opinion, but it’s true. The first movie was simple, direct and just gave a tiny glimpse at a world that has some rules...but they are not rules to show the underworld has some ‘values’ and structure...so just sit back because it’s still a revenge flick.

However, all the subsequent movies go crazy with the ‘secret society of assassins’ world building - the world has too many rule. You cannot fight or kill here, here or here; but you can fight here on alternate Thursdays after cocktail hour.

... Of course unless otherwise specified by a 'ruling elite' who the anarcho-syndicalist commune you could fight on a Wednesday. Because the elected officers of the ‘secret assassins guild’ take turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. : But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting. By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs,--

SHUT UP!

The world of John Wick is just dumb, because they try to explain it more or fill out the world unnecararrily. What was so wrong with an ex-hit-man comes out of retirement to track down the gangsters that killed his dog and took everything from him? The first rule in the first movie is easy...you don't fuck with someone who was 'made' or part of the system. John was retired, but he was not to be fucked with like civilians (i.e. Common people, normie) - "Organized crime- 101" level stuff. John says, "You gotta fix this" and they say fuck off. So, he kills everyone. However, as soon as the second movie they lay on the "wacky-weird world" on too thick and it ruins the other movies. Suddenly, everyone is a "character” out of a 1990s David Lynch film - it is world building gone amuck. The producers/writers think it is all very clever; but, it is just dumb.

I don't know where you got all this from. There's a very limited number of places people who are in the organisation are told not to "conduct business" in and there's no if's and's or but's about it. The hotels are off limits and so Perkins who a) "conducts business" and b) murders on the grounds gets punished. There's zero if, else, then statements to it. John does the same thing in 2 and so the bounty on his head is doubled.

The criminal underworld/assassins thing is fun and not in anyway serious. The idea that there's a chain of hotels that service nobody but assassins and that there's maybe 100's of assassins in one building at the same time is fun.

Additionally there's no rule that placed John Wick "off limits" because he was retired. The whole point is that Alfie Allen's character Iosef has fucked up royally by crossing John Wick, killing his dog and stealing his car.

Avatar image for boozak
BoOzak

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

I found the second one to have a better visual aesthetic. The story’s dumb in both movies but I appreciate the more fantastical take on assassins over just plain Russian gangs and stuff.

The real hot take for me is that John Wick movies are totally fine, better than most even, but in a world where Mad Max: Fury Road or the Raid 2 exist, John Wick is not the second coming of action cinema it was praised to be.

I agree, it's been a long time since Fury Road though and Gareth Evans said he has little to no interest in making The Raid 3. In terms of hollywood action movies I would say the John Wick movies for me are far more entertaining than anything Disney/Marvel has churned out in the last decade. Granted there are plenty of great action movies outside of hollywood, Iko Uwais helped make some of them, but none of them are up to the same quality of The Raid movies.

So yeah, they're not great in the grand scheme of things but they're the best thing hollywood has going at the moment when it comes to action.

If I had to compare 1&2 though I would say 2 had better action, but 1 was a more satisfying revenge movie. They're both stupid. (and thats fine with me)

Avatar image for nutter
nutter

2881

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

John Wick one is good.

I only saw John Wick 2 once, but it was mediocre. I think a cut where the story was at least 85% Common would have been a much tighter and better film.

I’m WAY more into those bananas amazing Indonesian films that have been regularly amazing in recent years (Merantau, Headshot, The Raid 1/2, The Night Comes for Us). I think those all make John Wick look pretty bland.

Avatar image for oursin_360
OurSin_360

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By OurSin_360

1 was the best but 2 was great as well, both different pretty different movies to me. I thought one had the kill bill vibe but about a dog, and 2 was pretty surprising since i didn't expect all that assassin society stuff going on. Both are just excuses for really good action scenes.

Avatar image for fear_the_booboo
Fear_the_Booboo

1122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@boozak: That’s true, and I agree with you in that I’d rather watch the John Wick movies than most of the super hero stuff that comes out.

Avatar image for fisk0
fisk0

7072

Forum Posts

58376

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 72

#22 fisk0  Moderator

What if they're all not good?

I wouldn't go that far, the first one was fun, but it really wasn't anything spectacular either. I could maybe agree that it's one of the better in the 2010s, after quite the drought of that kind of vigilante action movies, but you only have to go back to like 2004 to find low budget Dolph Lundgren movies that are considerably better.

Avatar image for sweep
Sweep

10636

Forum Posts

3587

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 12

#23 Sweep  Moderator

I was thinking today that the irony of the John Wick movies is they're actually at their best when they're focusing on the characters surrounding and reacting to John Wick rather than John Wick himself.

I think John Wick is going down the same path as the Fast & Furious films; They're all dumb, fun movies that require a suspension of disbelief in the name of enabling increasingly ridiculous stunts. You're right, each franchise becomes increasingly drunk on its own worldbuilding in a way which is obviously bananas but enables a succession of scenes which are enjoyable to watch. So yes, you're right that the subsequent films are not as "good" in a traditional sense, but I'm still really glad all those sequels exist anyway.

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

19620

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 14

#24  Edited By Humanity

@fisk0 said:
@liquiddragon said:

What if they're all not good?

I wouldn't go that far, the first one was fun, but it really wasn't anything spectacular either. I could maybe agree that it's one of the better in the 2010s, after quite the drought of that kind of vigilante action movies, but you only have to go back to like 2004 to find low budget Dolph Lundgren movies that are considerably better.

I think that is largely underselling John Wick, which at it's heart is a basic action movie, but there is a lot more care and detail that went into it than any of the 90's era popcorn action flicks. The choreography alone is worthy of praise as a lot of the fights are exciting to watch without being incredibly over the top. This is all John Wick 1 I'm talking about which was exaggerated but not ridiculous in the way the sequel got. There was a balance in the first one where Wick used hand to hand, fire arms and some grappling all in a seamless yet well measured manner. Watching John Wick 2 I couldn't believe it but I started to get bored by a lot of the encounters, especially since it seems like in every single fight he was going for these intricate ground tackles and then proceed to worm around with one bad guy awkwardly trapped between his pinky finger and big toe while disaptching other baddies coming in one at a time.

All that and of course there wasplenty of great cinematography at work there. The night club encounter is a great sequence from the first film and it was also the moment where I realized this wasn't just another dumb shooty-shoot-shoot movie with barely acting Keanu Reeves. Don't get me wrong, Keanu Reeves was still barely acting but miraculously it helped more than it hurt for this role.

Avatar image for shindig
Shindig

5185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Having not seen any of them, the rate of them churning out sequels has me thinking it's wound up like Taken. Those two films could've been left to stand alone like Point Blank or Dead Man's Shoes.

Avatar image for militantfreudian
militantfreudian

713

Forum Posts

213

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#26  Edited By militantfreudian

Realizing the third movie is just around the corner, I decided to see the first two over the weekend. I think the second movie is markedly better than the first. There was plenty of bad acting – really bad acting – and writing in the first, and even though it was shorter, I felt like it dragged toward the end. I thought the world-building of the second movie was more engaging than the trite revenge tale of the first. Also, the music during the action set-pieces were less offensive in Chapter 2. I'm kind of curious where Atomic Blonde ranks. I've only seen it the one time, but I remember thinking it was better than the first John Wick.