Which apocalyspe would be more fun to live through?

I had to choose nuclear because I loved Fallout 3, and I wouldn't be able to deal with the constant stress of the zombie apocalypse.

EDIT: I guess it's a tie with me. Shooting zombies in the face would be fun

Nuclear if only for the miniscule chance of being the one man who gets to go to Vault 69.

Zombies. If you go out in a zombie apocalypse, you go out big and you go out in a fury of melee and gore. A nuclear apocalypse would introduce all kinds of lame sicknesses and you could end up dying huddled in the corner of a toilet stall coughing up blood and scratching your skin past the point of breaking it.

Neither. It wouldn't be fun to live through an apocalypse.

It's tied and I chose zombies. Imagine how much fun it would be to shoot half dead people in the face with shotguns!

None because I don't own a gun.  :)

None, I live in Canada.

" None, I live in Canada. "

All of this Zombie apocalypse bullshit was mildly amusing when the Bombcast brings it up...but it's just gotten to a point a lameness that it ain't comin' back from >_>

I don't think I could put up with defending myself against zombies 24/7.  I chose option 1 because I'd imagine it would be easier to be a badass like Mad Max without stupid zombies after me all the time/

" @natetodamax: I was poking fun at my country's lack of civilian owned weapons. "

Zombie apocalypse hands down. I read World War Z and the Zombie Survival Guide. I have my shotgun loaded and a stash of medkits at the ready. I would also be okay with a robot apocalypse. Hell, if a robot apocalypse followed a zombie apocalypse I would be the happiest man alive...or the last.

Already a much more diverse 'choose your apocalypse' poll thread here.

Neither, because they're both THE FUCKING APOCALYPSE.

" I don't think I could put up with defending myself against zombies 24/7.  I chose option 1 because I'd imagine it would be easier to be a badass like Mad Max without stupid zombies after me all the time/ "

Biscuit Apocalypse. I think I'm ready.

I'm gonna play the odds, I will be dead anyway

I'd go with the Fallout one. Other then the raiders and super mutants, it's quite nice. I'd live in Andale. Haha, no probably Rivet City.

Zombie, but only if i was equiped with enough ammo and weapons to last me long enough to survive it.

You would most likely die as soon as nuclear fallout began. With the Zombie apocalypses at least you would have a chance to fight.

dude, you forgot robots.  what the hell's your problem?

" You would most likely die as soon as nuclear fallout began. With the Zombie apocalypses at least you would have a chance to fight. "

I doubt that actually living through an apocalypse would be 'fun'

None, I'd like to die first.

I love Fallout 3's setting, so I'd prefer that kind of post-nuclear, wasteland setting.

Zombie for sure!

Since you've implied that I obviously survived the holocaust, I would choose nuclear. Afterwards you can do whatever you want. Depending on what all exactly was lost in the detonation though, I don't know if I'd want to live. I want more of an I Am Legend, where I can raid anywhere I want, lol.

If you can count Matrix-like situations as an apocalypse, where the machines or computers enslave humanity and wreck havoc to the world, I'd go for that. Because there's actually a way to win somehow or at least die with dignity.

" @jonnyboy: The Biscuit Apocalypse sounds like the best so far.  Come join the Digestive Resistance! "

Depends on the type of zombie.  I don't want to be anywhere near the zombies from I Am Legend.

Zombies, so long as they're not like the 28 Days Later zombies, if they were like that... I'd be fucked.

I gotta tap some of that zombie ass!

Zombies, cause your chances of surviving a nuclear whitout some sickness are lame

Be eaten, or nuked? Tough choice.

I'll go for both; hopefully all the zombies will get nuked.

Neither zombie or nuclear.  I would prefer a variation on the meteor strike.  In the future (actually 1994) a runaway planet passes between the Earth & the moon...hijinks ensue.

Zombie!

The Nuclear one.  With the zombie apocalypse, it's just zombies everywhere.  I like variety :D

"I'd go with the Fallout one. Other then the raiders and super mutants, it's quite nice. I'd live in Andale. Haha, no probably Rivet City."

" I doubt that actually living through an apocalypse would be 'fun' "

zombies FTW. But I'll need some weapons and loads of pills.

I couldn't stand living in a Fallout 3 atmosphere, it just seems too filthy and I don't like living all hot and sticky with no soap or clean water. I would much prefer having to survive a zombie apocalypse. I live in sort of a rural area, so fending off zombies shouldn't be as difficult as if I lived in a large city. I would just get some friends together, barricade my house, stock up on food and ammo, and fend off for a few years until all of the zombies are too decayed to survive. When that happens, its off to the cities to plunder and loot anything I want!

Nuclear, easily. I'd get myself a dog, a few weapons, some beer, and a few stimpacks, and then I'd through all of that away (except the dog) and become a hippie in Oasis. Ah yes, that'd be the life.