Who Would Win in A Global World War III?

Avatar image for bunnyboiler
bunnyboiler

522

Forum Posts

16

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#1  Edited By bunnyboiler
Avatar image for liako21
liako21

566

Forum Posts

270

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By liako21

no one wins in war.

Avatar image for elegantruby
ElegantRuby

549

Forum Posts

206

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#3  Edited By ElegantRuby

Nobody.  A world war with the amount of Technology that we have now would utterly destroy all of humanity.  No one wins in that scenario.   

Avatar image for armaan8014
armaan8014

6314

Forum Posts

2847

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 17

#4  Edited By armaan8014

The one who would strike first. War over.

Avatar image for rtslord
RTSlord

1241

Forum Posts

132

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

#5  Edited By RTSlord

No one. Everyone would be dead and the earth would probably be horribly irradiated

Avatar image for video_game_king
Video_Game_King

36564

Forum Posts

59080

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 14

#6  Edited By Video_Game_King
@ElegantRuby said:
" Nobody.  A world war with the amount of Technology that we have now would utterly destroy all of humanity.  No one wins in that scenario.    "
I do. When you guys kill yourselves, I can extend my Kingdom onto your planet as soon as the radiation dies out. It's like Final Fantasy IV! (The Japanese version, at least.)
Avatar image for white_silhouette
White_Silhouette

517

Forum Posts

308

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#7  Edited By White_Silhouette

It's not a matter of who would "win". But who (if any) would be left.
 
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
Albert Einstein

Avatar image for buttonsmcboomboom
ButtonsMcBoomBoom

131

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By ButtonsMcBoomBoom

Everybody

Avatar image for habster3
habster3

3685

Forum Posts

1522

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By habster3

China. The US would probably come in second in my opinion, though.

Avatar image for domdog
Domdog

58

Forum Posts

68

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#10  Edited By Domdog

Fallout fans.

Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By The_Laughing_Man

Why is there no Canada option? 

Avatar image for white_silhouette
White_Silhouette

517

Forum Posts

308

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#12  Edited By White_Silhouette
@The_Laughing_Man said:
" Why is there no Canada option?  "
because we'd be. A world war?... fuck it. Hockey playoffs are on.
Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@White_Silhouette said:
" @The_Laughing_Man said:
" Why is there no Canada option?  "
because we'd be. A world war?... fuck it. Hockey playoffs are on. "
They are smart. They would not get involved. And who knows what they hide under that big Leaf flad. 
Avatar image for pazy
Pazy

2770

Forum Posts

1556

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By Pazy

No one would win, given currently technology and the political alliances everyone has I believe that the vast majority (or all) of the surface of the world will be attacked and destroyed, most likely with nuclear fallout making sure that everyone who survives loses as well.

Avatar image for capum15
Capum15

6013

Forum Posts

411

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Capum15

I. The country with the least amount of craters and radiation.
 
Alternatively...
 
J. @Video_Game_King said:

" @ElegantRuby said:
" Nobody.  A world war with the amount of Technology that we have now would utterly destroy all of humanity.  No one wins in that scenario.    "
I do. When you guys kill yourselves, I can extend my Kingdom onto your planet as soon as the radiation dies out. It's like Final Fantasy IV! (The Japanese version, at least.) "

Avatar image for luce
luce

4056

Forum Posts

39

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#16  Edited By luce

Where is the Robots option

Avatar image for aaox
Aaox

1674

Forum Posts

5623

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#17  Edited By Aaox

If you think about it, England's screwed because it'd only take a few Nukes to put all of our populated areas out of commission. We're like the Humans in Alien vs Predator.

Avatar image for lawrens
Lawrens

678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#18  Edited By Lawrens

Japan with their fucking Evangelions and Gundams.

Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By The_Laughing_Man

Mars will rise again! 

Avatar image for deactivated-5c5cdba6e0b96
deactivated-5c5cdba6e0b96

8259

Forum Posts

51

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 3

@The_Laughing_Man said:
" Why is there no Canada option?  "
 
Canada isn't really a war type country, even though we help out out fellow brothers we try to keep it as peaceful as possible.
Avatar image for feanor
Feanor

1440

Forum Posts

1760

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

#21  Edited By Feanor

The Untied States would win.  The US has more and better allies than any other country, and it has a far more advanced military.  Sure one obvious answer is China, because everyone wants to think China is this unbeatable superpower.  But China has no real way to mobilize its troops, sure it would be able to defend its country but it would not be able to efficiently invade a country that is separated by water.  And most Chinese troops wouldn't even make it to the mainland US, the American Navy is way to superior. 
 
And I doubt nukes would be used.  The only people dumb enough to use them are countries like Iran, and Korea.  And they won't have enough to "end the world".  The main reason the US has nukes is to deter countries like that from even thinking about using them.

Avatar image for mcfart
Mcfart

2064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#22  Edited By Mcfart

Canada dosen't have Nukes or military. Anyways, either China or the US would win, simply because of size and military might. If we assumed that a nuke could take out a city or 2 (WW2), then China/USA have the advantage since they have so many cities.

Avatar image for djeffers03
Djeffers03

2537

Forum Posts

753

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#23  Edited By Djeffers03

Chuck Norris.

Avatar image for gabriel
Gabriel

4139

Forum Posts

638

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#24  Edited By Gabriel

Whoever controls the Seas wins and no one has a better Navy than the United States

Avatar image for everyones_a_critic
Everyones_A_Critic

6500

Forum Posts

834

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

China. We'd run out of ammo before they ran out of people.

Avatar image for evo
EVO

4028

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#26  Edited By EVO

Weapons manufacturers.

Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@Mcfart said:
" Canada dosen't have Nukes or military. Anyways, either China or the US would win, simply because of size and military might. If we assumed that a nuke could take out a city or 2 (WW2), then China/USA have the advantage since they have so many cities. "
That's why they will win. No one will suspect them. 
Avatar image for ninjakiller
ninjakiller

3427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By ninjakiller

No one, WW3 between any of the major powers would eventually(if not immediately) become nuclear, and we would be living in the game Fallout.

Avatar image for mr_skeleton
Mr_Skeleton

5195

Forum Posts

7918

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

#29  Edited By Mr_Skeleton

The zombies.

Avatar image for mikkaq
MikkaQ

10296

Forum Posts

52

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#30  Edited By MikkaQ

The US because well... war.... war never changes.  
 
 
Or wait, has it changed? It could be about population control, information control, battlefield control, control control raaagh snaaake!  
 
 
Wait, what was this about again?

Avatar image for bobdaman18
Bobdaman18

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#31  Edited By Bobdaman18

America cus im in it. 
 
But in reality i live close to ny so i'd probably be dead once the first nukes started to fly.
Avatar image for colonel_cool
Colonel_Cool

826

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By Colonel_Cool

If nukes are used, whoever fires first would probably win. Without nukes, the United States hands down.

Avatar image for jimbo
Jimbo

10472

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#33  Edited By Jimbo

Cockroaches.
 
If you take NBC weapons off the table, it's still hard to say without any clue as to why the war started.  Assuming the NATO alliance remains in tact, then we win.  The US alone would have naval supremacy and the US & EU combined would almost certainly have air supremacy.  Infantry numbers alone don't really count for a lot.

Avatar image for ziron
Ziron

48

Forum Posts

239

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#34  Edited By Ziron

Russia's got way more nukes then the other countries do, so they may win.

Avatar image for gav47
Gav47

1583

Forum Posts

2761

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

#35  Edited By Gav47

Ireland cause whiskey lad.

Avatar image for eviltwin
EvilTwin

3313

Forum Posts

55

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By EvilTwin
Avatar image for uniform
uniform

1842

Forum Posts

33

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#37  Edited By uniform

Superman. Nuclear warfare is no match for his quest for peace.

Avatar image for redneckedcrake
RedneckedCrake

321

Forum Posts

124

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#38  Edited By RedneckedCrake

With nukes, no one would really win. Without nukes, the United States. 
 
No one can really match their capabilities except perhaps the Japanese and some European countries and they just don't have the numbers. Plus, the way the country is laid out, the military would receive a massive boost in military power during a major war.

Avatar image for wealllikepie
wealllikepie

819

Forum Posts

3045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 4

#39  Edited By wealllikepie
@Feanor said:
" The Untied States would win.  The US has more and better allies than any other country, and it has a far more advanced military.  Sure one obvious answer is China, because everyone wants to think China is this unbeatable superpower.  But China has no real way to mobilize its troops, sure it would be able to defend its country but it would not be able to efficiently invade a country that is separated by water.  And most Chinese troops wouldn't even make it to the mainland US, the American Navy is way to superior.  And I doubt nukes would be used.  The only people dumb enough to use them are countries like Iran, and Korea.  And they won't have enough to "end the world".  The main reason the US has nukes is to deter countries like that from even thinking about using them. "
honestly thats a bit ignorant
a) it dsnt matter how much you invest into the military as long as you have nuclear technology, at that point all you need is a few nukes to cover all of teh world
b) nobody would win, because if it was at the wwiii point, everybody would get screwed, even if they had far superior military tecnhonolgy
c) TRUST ME, if there is a war, itll be a nuclear war, China wouldnt bother to drag its ass all the way to american soil :P
Avatar image for redneckedcrake
RedneckedCrake

321

Forum Posts

124

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#40  Edited By RedneckedCrake
@Aaox said:
" If you think about it, England's screwed because it'd only take a few Nukes to put all of our populated areas out of commission. We're like the Humans in Alien vs Predator. "
Hahahahaha this is true, but I'd hate to see someone try to invade mainland England. Nearly impossible to invade.
Avatar image for kaaaaaaahn
kaaaaaaahn

406

Forum Posts

78

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By kaaaaaaahn
 because canada would be destroyed within minutes. 
 
either    usa. or china. it would be a close call
Avatar image for flaminghobo
flaminghobo

4787

Forum Posts

4325

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 14

#42  Edited By flaminghobo

No one wins in a nuclear war.

Avatar image for organicalistic_
Organicalistic_

3092

Forum Posts

391

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By Organicalistic_
@ElegantRuby said:
" Nobody.  A world war with the amount of Technology that we have now would utterly destroy all of humanity.  No one wins in that scenario.    "
yup, i fukin hate war
Avatar image for zajtalan
Zajtalan

1261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By Zajtalan

hahaha yea

Avatar image for edge426
edge426

157

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#45  Edited By edge426

no one would win it would all be back to triable warfare and living in caves 

Avatar image for deactivated-590b7522e5236
deactivated-590b7522e5236

1918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

the 10 guys in space

Avatar image for aaox
Aaox

1674

Forum Posts

5623

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#47  Edited By Aaox
@RedneckedCrake: I hear those Liverpudlians can absorb radiation, yes.
Avatar image for feanor
Feanor

1440

Forum Posts

1760

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

#48  Edited By Feanor
@wealllikepie: Honestly this is a bit ignorant, if kids on the internet realize that a nuclear war would end then world, then obviously world leaders do to.  What would the point of fighting be if the world gets destroyed?  We went through the entire cold war without a nuke going off, and thats because people don't want the world to end.
Avatar image for DELETE_chickenpants
ChickenPants

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49  Edited By ChickenPants
@ElegantRuby said:
" Nobody.  A world war with the amount of Technology that we have now would utterly destroy all of humanity.  No one wins in that scenario.    "
This.
The next ''World War'' will kill us all.
Avatar image for geno
Geno

6767

Forum Posts

5538

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 3

#50  Edited By Geno

I would have to go with China on this one, they would win by sheer numbers alone and their military tech has been improving at an exponential rate lately. Really the only other contender is the U.S., and that's only if they come out with some groundbreaking new technology (i.e. nanosuits). Russia I don't think would "win", but it wouldn't lose either, since its landmass, geography and weather conditions make it nearly impossible to conquer.  
 
But really, the chances of any country coming out on top in an all-out war is probably very small.