Avatar image for liquiddragon
Posted by liquiddragon (3291 posts) 3 months, 10 days ago

Poll: Was "Virtual Console" a dumb name? (85 votes)

Yeah, pretty dumb. 18%
It's not great but it works. 35%
No, it was cool. 45%
Poll 2%

Jeff's mentioned many times over the years how dumb the term "Virtual Console" was and that always surprised me. I always thought it was a cool label for the emulated retro game catalog but am I alone on this?

Avatar image for bigsocrates
#1 Posted by BigSocrates (1963 posts) -

It was a fine name. It communicated the idea that you had a virtual version of those consoles you could buy games for. It encouraged collecting and made it clear those games were for other, older machines (because you couldn't have a virtual 360 on a Wii.)

Compared to other Nintendo names (Wii U caused huge damage and probably cost millions of units in sales) Virtual Console is pretty perfect.

Avatar image for mellotronrules
#2 Posted by mellotronrules (2568 posts) -

i think it's dumb insofar as it's a strange way to conceptualize software.

i mean i get it- if you're trying to express the idea to someone who doesn't broadly understand how hardware/software works, calling emulated software a 'virtual console' title kinda sorta communicates the idea. but if it were me i would have just gone with words like 'criterion' or 'classic' or 'legacy' or 'vault,' thereby putting the emphasis on the importance of the software vs. the physical device it came from.

just a matter of taste, though.

Avatar image for kingbonesaw
#3 Posted by KingBonesaw (1384 posts) -

Virtual Console isn’t a dumb name. What’s dumb is people getting so emotionally attached the the name. The Switch online service is a much better way to deliver old games to players.

Avatar image for bigsocrates
#4 Posted by BigSocrates (1963 posts) -

@kingbonesaw: I mean...it would be a better way to deliver old games to players if it were actually delivering a sufficient number of the right old games.

2 NES games a month, many of which are terrible games nobody would play, ain't doing it for me.

Avatar image for someoneproud
#5 Posted by someoneproud (526 posts) -

I've heard a lot worse, at least it gives a reasonable sense of what it actually is, unlike the Xbox names... although at least I have absolutely zero clue what they'll call the next gen Xbox, so I have a surprise to look forward to I guess...

Avatar image for nutter
#6 Posted by nutter (1980 posts) -

I thought it was totally fine.

Avatar image for dudeglove
#7 Posted by dudeglove (13707 posts) -

Too close of an association to either VR or the Virtua Boy, both of which have severely negative associations. Dumb name and Jeff is right to call it out.

Avatar image for yesiamaduck
#8 Posted by Yesiamaduck (2539 posts) -

Dumb name because whenever i hear the name i think its a subscription service

Avatar image for mrgreenman
#9 Posted by MrGreenMan (185 posts) -

The name is whatever, my issue is people misunderstand what is really is. Then again Nintendo and terrible names for things are kind of par for course at this point. Just like Nintendo calling indie games on their platform Nindies. It's a cringy, terrible stupid name and anyone using it makes me want to kick in the face.