Jeff and the guys over exaggerated the graphics improvements!!

Avatar image for twoonefive
#1 Posted by TwoOneFive (9786 posts) -
Gamespot Gears 2 vs Gears 1 graphics
I really enjoyed the second game, but i after getting to seriously look at some decent comparison shots here, i actually thought the first game looked better in many of the comparisons (i didn't read anything they wrote though, which you shouldn't either, they're just trying to feed you their opinions, just check out the pics and make your own judgements.)

all i know is though, that the guys on GB were making it out like this game blew away the previous one in terms of graphics. i remember Brad, in a bombcast, getting all nerdy about how incredibly detailed Marcus' face was and getting all into to detail about the gruesome scarrrrsss 00o0oh. really not that big of a difference. 
Avatar image for get2sammyb
#2 Edited by get2sammyb (6686 posts) -

I should clarify I have only played the first game but from looking at that I think Gears 2 is a huge step forward.

*shrugs* I'll leave this to the people who have played both.

EDIT: Still think Gears 2 looks better but on second look I do prefer the colouring of Gridlock and the rain on Subway. However -- Gears 2 looks much more defined. I don't know. I haven't played Gears 2. Blah, blah.

EDIT 2: Aren't these the maps from a downloadable map pack? I'm sure the ingame graphics of the campaign are the step forward GiantBomb talked about. They don't usually make things up?

Avatar image for weltal
#3 Posted by Weltal (2304 posts) -

Uhh, Gears 2 looks a shit ton better, looking at those shots.

Avatar image for mattyftm
#4 Posted by MattyFTM (14807 posts) -

Still shots don't really show graphical differences well. Only seeing the action in motion really shows it well.

Moderator
Avatar image for efwefwe
#5 Posted by wefwefasdf (6730 posts) -

Gears 2 is a lot more defined it is just that Gears 1 used a darker color scheme to hide it. I personally like the darker colors though.

Avatar image for daniel_beck_90
#6 Posted by daniel_beck_90 (3243 posts) -

Gears of War 2 is noticeably a better looking game than already stunning  GOW1 . 
you know what ?!  you can not really judge the graphics by just looking at the internet images , go pick up both games and play 'em (on an HD-TV) and then you'll realize the huge visual improvements occurred in the second game

Avatar image for crunchuk
#7 Posted by crunchUK (6052 posts) -

it's simple really

seeing the even more detailed textures pass by you smoothly is just *drool*

Avatar image for jakob187
#8 Posted by jakob187 (22938 posts) -

Here we go, looking at SCREENSHOTS to compare graphic capability.  Moreover, you are talking about the revamp of a previous map!!!  Should we compare Cold Storage to Lockout now?


Running gameplay is the only thing that matters to me.  Hope y'alls screenshot war here goes well...
Avatar image for twoonefive
#9 Posted by TwoOneFive (9786 posts) -

hmm maybe im seeing things wrong,

i know the colors were better, and i know the depth of field is better, but is the texture work that much better?
Avatar image for sanch0
#10 Posted by Sanch0 (8 posts) -

Beautiful game! I'm only just into the underground part, a little after the cinematic with the badass predator like guy but that first section blew me away! I hope it keeps it up throughout, I'm pretty sure it will deliver. Bravo!

Avatar image for the_dude
#11 Posted by The_Dude (827 posts) -

Gears 2 looks better, but those pictures are all pretty terrible, what the hell is up with the resolution?

Avatar image for jakob187
#12 Posted by jakob187 (22938 posts) -
TwoOneFive said:
"hmm maybe im seeing things wrong,
i know the colors were better, and i know the depth of field is better, but is the texture work that much better?"
Well, given the amount of horrificly bad UE3 texture pop-in that you find in the first game when you compare it to the second....yeah, GoW2 does have better texture work.
But again, you are also talking about two different games with two different feelings.  The first GoW was very dark and high contrast.  GoW2 is very different.  On top of that, a lot of the detail on the multiplayer maps was dropped down a bit all around just for the sake of faster loading and bringing anything out that could lag the match down.  In turn, though...they didn't search their code and test it enough for all the glitches in multiplayer, so    =  /
Avatar image for captain_fookup
#13 Posted by Captain_Fookup (1526 posts) -

Do everyone a favor and never post articles from Gamespot again.

Avatar image for toxicenchiliada
#14 Posted by toxicEnchiliada (354 posts) -
Avatar image for player1
#15 Posted by Player1 (4165 posts) -

I don't know what shots you were looking at, but in my opinion Gears 2 blew the first out of the water.

Still though, Gears was the best at its time, so I'll never forget my initial amazement with it's graphics.

But after actually playing both games ( I assume you haven't, no offense, you don't come off as a guy who owns a 360) Gears 2 graphics are once again, the best of its time. They are the best graphics on the 360.

Avatar image for babble
#16 Posted by Babble (1276 posts) -

They should have shown shots of the underground levels. Multiplayer levels are quite as good looking as the single player is.

Avatar image for liquidprince
#17 Posted by LiquidPrince (16884 posts) -

The biggest improvement is bigger color pallet. Although I sort of miss the monochrome from Gears one look.

Avatar image for kazona
#18 Posted by Kazona (3393 posts) -
LiquidPrince said:
"The biggest improvement is bigger color pallet. Although I sort of miss the monochrome from Gears one look."
Really? Judging from thoses shots I actually find the Gears 2 ones to be more monotonous in color. More detailed and well-defined, but with less color.
Avatar image for dsplayer1010
#19 Posted by dsplayer1010 (2331 posts) -

Gears 2's graphics are much more detailed than in the original

Avatar image for zebadee
#20 Posted by Zebadee (507 posts) -

Gears 2 still has the annoying texture pop in but they hide it better by increasing their alpha once they have loaded.

Avatar image for neondinosaur
#21 Posted by Otacon (2282 posts) -

I've only just got an xbox 360 so only now have i had a proper chance to play both games. I would say that Gears 2 is most definitely an improvement on the first game but it's not mind bogglingly better.

Avatar image for gizmo
#22 Edited by Gizmo (5467 posts) -

Would have to say Gears 1 looks better... judging from these screens alone, I haven't played it yet.

Avatar image for player1
#23 Posted by Player1 (4165 posts) -
Kazona said:
"LiquidPrince said:
"The biggest improvement is bigger color pallet. Although I sort of miss the monochrome from Gears one look."
Really? Judging from thoses shots I actually find the Gears 2 ones to be more monotonous in color. More detailed and well-defined, but with less color."
thats because it shows multiplayer maps, and the world is virtually destroyed in gears 2, so its all dusty and gray. During the campaign you see way more color.
Avatar image for atejas
#24 Posted by atejas (3151 posts) -

Want good graphics?
Don't use Unreal 3

Avatar image for rowr
#25 Posted by Rowr (5861 posts) -

Wow i didnt realise till i looked at those shots how much they brightened the second one up.

Also, Gears2 looks pretty incredible. How about you put the first game on and compare for yourself.

Avatar image for ltcoljaxson
#26 Posted by ltcoljaxson (1190 posts) -
MattyFTM said:
"Still shots don't really show graphical differences well. Only seeing the action in motion really shows it well."
Yeah this. Seeing all the details moving and all the various blur effects/lighting effects makes Gears 2 look a lot better.
Avatar image for 1_879_116_9420
#27 Posted by 1_879_116_9420 (124 posts) -

I saw a graphics comaprison of Gears 1 vs. Gears 2 versions of the same maps on that site which shall not be named, and basically it looks like Epic ruined Gear's appearance in the new game. They put this sort of green/yellow tint over everything, and lost much of the variety of caves/human streets/swamps of the first game: now everything is swamped.

Avatar image for arkthemaniac
#28 Posted by Arkthemaniac (6872 posts) -

Wow.

It actually kinda looks like they shot the entire thing trough a coffee filter.
Avatar image for handsomedead
#29 Posted by HandsomeDead (11853 posts) -

I finished the second game a few times then went back to the first to finally complete it on Insane and I did notice a definite difference. It seems more to do with colours and lighting than actual base graphics though, which is something missed in those still shots.

Avatar image for lieutenant
#30 Posted by Lieutenant (357 posts) -

A static compressed .jpg isn't the best way to compare graphics.

Avatar image for diamond
#31 Posted by Diamond (8678 posts) -

Those 'comparison' shots are amazingly shitty.  To me, Gears 2 looked worlds better than Gears 1.

Gears 1 during the rainstorm fighting the lambent guys that would explode for the first time.  Rain effect was basically a noise shader, framerate would drop to below 10fps at times, lighting and colors weren't as nice IMO
Gears 2 during the rainstorm, constant 30fps, nice lightning effects.  Rain effect was somewhat nicer, but still not perfect.

Basically I hated how Gears 1 looked (and played for that matter), but I think Gears 2 is one of the top 10 best looking games released to date.

Avatar image for williamrlbaker
#32 Posted by WilliamRLBaker (4941 posts) -

Gears of war 2 was a major upgrade over gears of war 1 sheer quality of models alone was upped let alone texture quality, and size of maps...ect
The same for halo 2-3 the upgrade was amazing maps bigger, models better, textures better lighting better.

Avatar image for biggerbomb
#33 Posted by BiggerBomb (7011 posts) -

I have played both of them and I can assure you, they did not over exaggerate the graphical improvements of Gears of War 2 over its predecessor.

Avatar image for archscabby
#34 Posted by ArchScabby (5877 posts) -

It seems like in Gears2 they added fog to all the levels.

Avatar image for liquidprince
#35 Posted by LiquidPrince (16884 posts) -

Bigger color scheme is the biggest difference to me. It looks just as good if not better.

Avatar image for rhcpfan24
#36 Posted by RHCPfan24 (8663 posts) -

I don't know what I have to say that hasn't already been mentioned, but Gears 2's graphics are superior to the original. Though still shots are bad ways to compare them, there is still a huge improvement between the two.  Gears 2 has brighter colors, better lighting, better textures, better everything.

Avatar image for cheapoz
#37 Posted by Cheapoz (1142 posts) -

To what end does this nit picking benefit us?

Gears 2 not only looks better, but Gears 1 still looks friggin great too, what do you people want?!
Avatar image for archscabby
#38 Posted by ArchScabby (5877 posts) -
Cheapoz said:
"To what end does this nit picking benefit us?
Gears 2 not only looks better, but Gears 1 still looks friggin great too, what do you people want?!
"
Ice cream cake.
Avatar image for cheapoz
#39 Posted by Cheapoz (1142 posts) -
ArchScabby said:
"Cheapoz said:
"To what end does this nit picking benefit us?
Gears 2 not only looks better, but Gears 1 still looks friggin great too, what do you people want?!
"
Ice cream cake."
Make it happen.
Avatar image for liquidprince
#40 Posted by LiquidPrince (16884 posts) -
Cheapoz said:
"ArchScabby said:
"Cheapoz said:
"To what end does this nit picking benefit us?
Gears 2 not only looks better, but Gears 1 still looks friggin great too, what do you people want?!
"
Ice cream cake."
Make it happen."
For everyone.

Avatar image for biggerbomb
#41 Posted by BiggerBomb (7011 posts) -
LiquidPrince said:
"Cheapoz said:
"ArchScabby said:
"Cheapoz said:
"To what end does this nit picking benefit us?
Gears 2 not only looks better, but Gears 1 still looks friggin great too, what do you people want?!
"
Ice cream cake."
Make it happen."
For everyone.

"

Now.
Avatar image for smugdarkloser
#42 Posted by SmugDarkLoser (5040 posts) -

they pretty much look the same but Gears 2 has much, much bigger environments

Avatar image for blackwaterco
#43 Posted by BlackWaterCO (1685 posts) -

Man...Gears of War series is overrated im my eyes

Avatar image for jeffsekai
#44 Posted by Jeffsekai (7159 posts) -

Having gone back and played from gears online/campaning only a few days ago I can safley say that Gears 2 looks 10x better than the first one.

Avatar image for drakesfortune
#45 Posted by drakesfortune (350 posts) -

I have to agree, I don't feel that the graphics are improved as much as they made out.  There's definitely an improvement, but to me the biggest improvement was that the environments were much more interesting to look at, tastefully had color added to them, and better designed.  I actually went through and picked up a couple extra GoW1 achievements directly after finishing GoW2, and didn't feel like the improvements were nearly as pronounced as the giant bomb guys did.

Avatar image for vecta
#46 Posted by Vecta (181 posts) -
ArchScabby said:
"It seems like in Gears2 they added fog to all the levels."
They added depth of field. A LOT of people seem to mistake it for texture blur purposefully done to make the game run smoother.

And yes going back and forth between the 2 games you can easily see the improvement of Gears 2 over the original. Everything from the animations to the textures are much higher quality.
Avatar image for archscabby
#47 Posted by ArchScabby (5877 posts) -
Vecta said:
"ArchScabby said:
"It seems like in Gears2 they added fog to all the levels."
They added depth of field. A LOT of people seem to mistake it for texture blur purposefully done to make the game run smoother.

And yes going back and forth between the 2 games you can easily see the improvement of Gears 2 over the original. Everything from the animations to the textures are much higher quality."
no look at gridlock, it's all foggy in a greenish sort of way.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.