It's not too difficult to predict review scores with only five increments but I'm going to anyway:
 
Four stars.
 
Jeff seemed positive in the Quick Look but it's not a five star game. It's probably closer to three stars but that's not going to happen. Jeff would appear way too grumpy in the light of the events of the first game, and he probably likes the game too much to rate it only three stars.
 
Do you agree with the prediction?

Man will I be happy after this game comes out and people will just let it go. 
 
I say 4 stars as well. Seems functional enough and the art style is cool.

Four stars. Jeff clearly enjoys it though I imagine for him it won't give him the 5 star treatment as a TPS.

It all depends on the story. If its great then four. If not then its three stars at best.

8.8

I'm guessing a 3 star review.

I heard it's a short, one-time experience with limited replay value, and the multiplayer doesn't help much. 
Three stars.

From what I've seen it seems it looks pretty mediocre so I'm guessing three stars. But I hope I'm wrong and it turns out to be better than I expected.

FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT 
 
STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!!

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

Jeff looses his mind, and gives it FIVE stars!

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

" @Ahmad_Metallic said:

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

What the fuck is wrong with reviews? They help you figure out whether you want a game or not. Without them, people would all just buy shit all the time purely because of the marketing. "

" @supermike6 said:

" @Ahmad_Metallic said:

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

What the fuck is wrong with reviews? They help you figure out whether you want a game or not. Without them, people would all just buy shit all the time purely because of the marketing. "

Yep, still many reviews are biased anyway... It's unfortunate. "

Three or four stars.

" @supermike6 said:

" @Ahmad_Metallic said:

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

What the fuck is wrong with reviews? They help you figure out whether you want a game or not. Without them, people would all just buy shit all the time purely because of the marketing. "

Yep, still many reviews are biased anyway... It's unfortunate. "

I imagine the game will get either a four or three star review.

" @Jeust said:

" @supermike6 said:

" @Ahmad_Metallic said:

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

What the fuck is wrong with reviews? They help you figure out whether you want a game or not. Without them, people would all just buy shit all the time purely because of the marketing. "

Yep, still many reviews are biased anyway... It's unfortunate. "

But we're talking about Giant Bomb reviews in this thread, not any of those people. It's not the place to start yelling about metacritic. "

" @supermike6 said:

" @Ahmad_Metallic said:

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

What the fuck is wrong with reviews? They help you figure out whether you want a game or not. Without them, people would all just buy shit all the time purely because of the marketing. "

Yep, still many reviews are biased anyway... It's unfortunate. "

I'm thinking 4, but there's a possibility that there's something he finds he doesn't like about the game that didn't come across in the demo and he gives it a 3.

" @Jeust said:

" @supermike6 said:

" @Ahmad_Metallic said:

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

What the fuck is wrong with reviews? They help you figure out whether you want a game or not. Without them, people would all just buy shit all the time purely because of the marketing. "

Yep, still many reviews are biased anyway... It's unfortunate. "

There's no such thing as an objective review and even the there was, what would be the point? No one is going to play it from that point of view either. "

I liked what i played of the demo, and the visual style is just too dam great. I would guess 4 stars unless the game gets to repetitive.

I would say 4. But just for shits and giggles 6.

3-4

It looks like a three or a four to me. Regardless, I'm going to pick it up. The shooting feels a bit loose but the demo intrigued me..

"

Reviewed on August 17, 2010

Kane and Lynch 2: Dog Days is a large step up from its predecessor, even if it still doesn't fully live up to its potential. 
By Jeff Gerstmann 

"

He'll rate it fair, and then proceed to fire himself.

" He'll rate it fair, and then proceed to fire himself. "

3 stars.......maybe 2

I'm going to say 3 stars.

three

" FUCK REVIEWS, AND ALL THE TOOLS WHO DEPEND ON METACRITIC TO TELL THEM WHETHER TO BUY A GAME OR NOT  STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTHERFUCKING REVIEWS !!! "

GUYS STOP TALKING ABOUT REVIEWS ON A SITE THAT REVIEWS GAMES

I think it will get a 6.0

It'll either be 2 or 3 stars.

" I think it will get a 6.0 "

In GIantbombs, 4 stars
 
In Gamespots 8.1

" @Bludgeoner86 said:

" I think it will get a 6.0 "

Why do you say that? OHHHHHHH YEAAAH just like his Gamespot review of the original! Genius, man. Fuckin gold. "

" In GIantbombs, 4 stars  In Gamespots 8.1 "

3 Stars

" @Mikemcn said:

" In GIantbombs, 4 stars  In Gamespots 8.1 "

A 4 out of 5 would be equal to an 8.0. I can't tell if you're trying to be serious or facetious.  Personally I think that it'll get a 3 out of five. It looks like a perfectly functional third person cover based shooter that is going to live or die on it's unique visuals and story. "

Well, I just go by how Metacritic simply divides 100 by 5 and goes with that. Seems the most logical to me. To each his own though.

I'm thinking 3, but I'm hoping for 4. He seems to enjoy it

No way it goes past 3/5 IMO especially if the rumors I've heard from uh...yeah, the people that are playing it early and you know what that means unfortunately...the game is damned short and the multiplayer is still less than perfectly polished to say the least.

Three or four. Nothing more, nothing less. Probably just three.

6.5 out of 10

4.