Just because you wanted to get this out before Black Ops you've wrecked the game right into the ground and showed us all how terrible you're at quality control.
 When i hopped into the campaign all i repeated was " What the fuck? are you kidding me? please tell me this is a joke."  here want me to list the problems?

• The worst pop in's and muddy textures you'll ever see in your life.
• Framerate drop, hate them? well MoH redefined it in this game by having you spend more time waiting for the game to keep up with the action than playing.
• Horrible,horrible..AI. it's the worst AI this generation, you can stand in the middle of the battlefield and you won't be able to tell your enemies from your friends since they both avoid shooting you and do nothing at all when you get close to them. hell i had one pass right behind me and sit right next to me in cover.
  

Just because you wanted to get this out before Black Ops you've wrecked the game right into the ground and showed us all how terrible you're at quality control.
 When i hopped into the campaign all i repeated was " What the fuck? are you kidding me? please tell me this is a joke."  here want me to list the problems?

• The worst pop in's and muddy textures you'll ever see in your life.
• Framerate drop, hate them? well MoH redefined it in this game by having you spend more time waiting for the game to keep up with the action than playing.
• Horrible,horrible..AI. it's the worst AI this generation, you can stand in the middle of the battlefield and you won't be able to tell your enemies from your friends since they both avoid shooting you and do nothing at all when you get close to them. hell i had one pass right behind me and sit right next to me in cover.
  

To be honest, the MOH series wasn't doing to good after the first few games anyway... And I am pretty sure the worst pop in goes to Mercenaries 2 on the PS2.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
dont buy the game

MoH wasn't in stellar shape before this.

"

You really should calm down before posting "

" @Jack268 said:

"

You really should calm down before posting "

"

" MoH wasn't in stellar shape before this. "

" You rant about the campaign, then you say the campaigns good?  "

The campaign? EA doesn't think you care about the campaign. Play the multiplayer instead.

" The campaign? EA doesn't think you care about the campaign. Play the multiplayer instead. "

FUCK THEY RUINED A FRANCHISE THAT HAS BEEN DEAD FOR YEARS! I GOTTA POST ABOUT IT BECAUSE THE OLD GAMES WERE SO DAMN GOOD!!!!

" FUCK THEY RUINED A FRANCHISE THAT HAS BEEN DEAD FOR YEARS! I GOTTA POST ABOUT IT BECAUSE THE OLD GAMES WERE SO DAMN GOOD!!!! "

" @DystopiaX said:

" FUCK THEY RUINED A FRANCHISE THAT HAS BEEN DEAD FOR YEARS! I GOTTA POST ABOUT IT BECAUSE THE OLD GAMES WERE SO DAMN GOOD!!!! "

They were. dumbass. "

" @Axxol said:

" @Jack268 said:

"

You really should calm down before posting "

"

"

It's really not that bad, this definitely sounds like a standard overreaction.

Deep breaths lavaman, deep breaths.

" @OtakuGamer said:

" You rant about the campaign, then you say the campaigns good?  "

It lacks MASSIVE polish, that's the problem. it's not even pre-alpha quality FFS. "

I don't know if my feelings are as strong as yours, but I do agree that the game had no business releasing so soon.  
 
I think the two major points of emphasis are these: 

• The campaign, no matter how good, seems to be way to short (especially since that was all EA LA [Danger Close] was responsible for the whole time)
• The multiplayer couldn't identify itself in a mirror.

This franchise was already dead.

The thing is, EA has a lot of other shooters, so they can afford to not have everyone be perfect, or even, good.  
 
They have Dead Space 2 in early 2011, that looks pretty good. Also, Crysis 2 is coming out, which also looks pretty good. 
 
Then, they have Battlefield 3 coming out. So in terms of shooters, EA is looking pretty good. Too bad Medal of Honor wasn't amazing, as that would make people trust the EA name more.

Uhmmmm.... Can we please be clear on this before all the EA bashing commences:
 
Now while they did in fact publish it, EA did *not* develop this MoH; it was *developed* by DICE (and to a lesser extent Danger Close)
 
So blame those Swedish meatballs, but not *the other* meatballs from the other Swedish game studio. :D

MoH was wrecked ever since Airborne came out.

I'm starting to think that these issues are isolated to the console...I just finished the "Gunfighters" mission and haven't had ANY problems. In fact this is some of the best SP I've played in a military FPS (not to mention authentic) since the heyday of Call of Duty.

" Uhmmmm.... Can we please be clear on this before all the EA bashing commences:  Now while they did in fact publish it, EA did *not* develop this MoH; it was *developed* by DICE (and to a lesser extent Danger Close) So blame those Swedish meatballs, but not *the other* meatballs from the other Swedish game studio. :D "  

Medal Of Honor sucking is no surprise since the series hasnt been any good since Frontline anyways.

I like how you think that this is the game that ruined the Medal Of Honour franchise.

" @REIGN: I'm not going to argue with you on that DICE typically makes sound games (as they typically do), but the fact remains DICE made this MoH. Now you can play the blame-game all you want and displace responsibility onto anyone you like (publisher, marketing, janitors who didn't clean the crapper properly so the devs couldn't concentrate, etc) all you like, but it doesn't change the fact that DICE made the game.  I'm not going to argue with you that publishers often rush games to unrealistic time frames, because that is a reality of the industry, but it was *not* created in a mere 8 month period. Video games on consoles like 360 and PS3 typically always spend at least 2-3 years in development (sometimes much more for big titles). Now, granted the amount of time the public may be aware that such a game is in development may be considerably less, studios are constantly working on games years before they are announced to the public. I can say that with absolute certainty.   Most of (if not all of) the complaints people have voiced in this thread pertain to poor textures, weak colors, shoddy design decisions - things which are all apart of the development cycle - not the publication cycle. But again, feel free to blame anyone or everyone you want if it makes you feel any better. So you can cut this anyway you want, but at the end of the day DICE made (most of) the game - EA published it.  All I am saying is I think it's quite misinformed and petty to go off on the big bad known names as we always do, when there involvement in the production was minimal. "

" @lavaman77 said:

" @Axxol said:

" @Jack268 said:

"

You really should calm down before posting "

"

"

"

ohmygodthisgamesucks?  wut?  Oh wait, yeah.  Saw that comin.

I think you should be mad at DICE they were the ones that actually made the game thou...

I'm pretty sure EA wrecked MoH a long time ago.

I´m actually enjoying MPa lot.. I guess DICE MP phase suits me well no mater what.. Ive playéd all battlefield games since 1942 but bbc2,

I dont know why people get so emotional most of this choices comes down to personal taste.. its not like evil EA is eating live puppys

" @REIGN: I'm not going to argue with you on that DICE typically makes sound games (as they typically do), but the fact remains DICE made this MoH. Now you can play the blame-game all you want and displace responsibility onto anyone you like (publisher, marketing, janitors who didn't clean the crapper properly so the devs couldn't concentrate, etc) all you like, but it doesn't change the fact that DICE made the game.  I'm not going to argue with you that publishers often rush games to unrealistic time frames, because that is a reality of the industry, but it was *not* created in a mere 8 month period. Video games on consoles like 360 and PS3 typically always spend at least 2-3 years in development (sometimes much more for big titles). Now, granted the amount of time the public may be aware that such a game is in development may be considerably less, studios are constantly working on games years before they are announced to the public. I can say that with absolute certainty.   Most of (if not all of) the complaints people have voiced in this thread pertain to poor textures, weak colors, shoddy design decisions - things which are all apart of the development cycle - not the publication cycle. But again, feel free to blame anyone or everyone you want if it makes you feel any better. So you can cut this anyway you want, but at the end of the day DICE made (most of) the game - EA published it.  All I am saying is I think it's quite misinformed and petty to go off on the big bad known names as we always do, when there involvement in the production was minimal. "