With 5 million copies sold, I'm not really surprised:
 
 http://www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-7613-Medal-of-Honor-Sequel-in-the-Works-at-Danger-Close.html
 
So what's your take on this. As someone who has yet to play this, I'm not sure what to expect from a sequel.
 

• What will it be called?
  
• Where will it take place?
• Will DC actually do the multiplayer this time (DICE is busy as of late)
• Will it just continue the story of Tier 1? (I haven't a clue how it ends)
• What does Jeff have to say about this?
  

Most likely continuing where the game ended in MOH. Not sure where they were but it was in a middle eastern city at least.
Hopefully they'll take it to tell a bit of more story in urban area without extreme combat all the time.
 
Think it's good they get another chance at the MOH franchise. The campaign was ok but short and not diverse enough in the scenarios and events.
I would be surprised if they didn't continue the Tier 1 story.. Probably recruiting the US soldier you played as when trying to rescue.. Rabbit was his name?

I'm glad for a sequel. MOH had some great moments, just the overall game was kinda "meh". 

Medal of Honor: Allied Assault Again.

I didn't know it had sold that well.  I enjoyed the campaign quite a bit -more so than Black Ops at least- so it's cool they're making another one.

It really sold that well? I'm surprised.

" Most likely continuing where the game ended in MOH. Not sure where they were but it was in a middle eastern city at least. Hopefully they'll take it to tell a bit of more story in urban area without extreme combat all the time.  Think it's good they get another chance at the MOH franchise. The campaign was ok but short and not diverse enough in the scenarios and events. I would be surprised if they didn't continue the Tier 1 story.. Probably recruiting the US soldier you played as when trying to rescue.. Rabbit was his name? "

" I'm glad for a sequel. MOH had some great moments, just the overall game was kinda "meh".  "

As long as they make the campaign longer and make more maps for the combat mission multiplayer mode then color me pleased.
I liked the simple military objectives in the campaign like take and hold the mountain, it made me get more into the role of a soldier rather than part of an action film like COD has become.
Combat Mission was a great multiplayer mode, like rush from BC2 but infantry only for the most part, and everything seemed to be real world based.

Why not? Maybe they could fix the things that were iffy about the latest one. I should pick it up, I think I would enjoy it.

METAL OF HONOR< DARK OPERATIONS> 
 
 
BTW: Metal of Honor is totally my band's name. 

For the DICE question, my guess is it depends on when they want this game out. With them pulling everyone onto BF3, I could see them having people work on it if it comes out sometime (6ish months) after BF3's holiday release date. Since you won't need so many people after a certain stage of development (since all you're doing is fine tuning or whatever) I expect some of DICE would go on to work on other things, maybe including this game.

Remember the time when MOH was actually good? Oh Allied Assault how i miss thee.

• What will it be called?
  
• Where will it take place?
• Will DC actually do the multiplayer this time (DICE is busy as of late)
• Will it just continue the story of Tier 1? (I haven't a clue how it ends)
• What does Jeff have to say about this?

Something something black ops in Vietnam.

I liked MOH's campaign a lot. Would say I'm looking forward to this.

When the modern combat fps genre fails it is going to be glorious. 

That's good news, since they can further improve the game, but I hope DICE won't be doing the multiplayer this time, and as another one mentioned, they should stick with one engine. 

OffDutyGamers (military veteran gamers) who helped with the first game is being asked to help with the sequel:

http://www.offdutygamers.com/2011/10/new-medal-of-honor-teaser/

I kind of want to go through the game, and it has some interesting things from the get go (like its take on leaning), but I just couldn't get through it. I only played through the first stage and was done. So I have no idea how I feel about a sequel.

Edit - I take it back, I just beat it about an hour ago. Short game, but it was alright. It was awkward, because I felt more for the situation and the characters as soldiers, rather than the characters themselves. The game has some bad stuff in it and in the end a lot of what was there kind of felt insignificant, but I kind of liked it and hope the sequel fixes everything that wasn't great about the first. I would give it a 7.1, or a 3 1/2 stars out of five.

Good, I enjoyed MoH's campaign thoroughly. A more realistic take on Spec Ops dudes' missions was quite fun, I hope it is more of that.

Hell, if it was a WW2 "spec ops" campaign where you played in an elite paratrooper squad, that would be awesome. I've been craving a new good WW2 shooter than isn't a CoD-style game.