Crusader king 2, Victoria 2 and Heart of iron 3. So what was your favorite out of all 3 of them.
Paradox Interactive AB
Company »
A Swedish publisher and developer best known for its strategy games, mainly released for the PC.
What's the best paradox interactive game out of
The idea of starting and learning Crusader King 2 was so daunting to me that I kept putting it off. I eventually decided to say screw it and just go in not knowing anything and starting off with the Holy Roman Empire.
I've never had so much fun "losing" and seeing my empire fall into complete chaos and everyone around me turning against me. Not only did I have fun, but I learned the game as well.
So my vote goes for Crusader King 2.
@TaliciaDragonsong said:
Mount and Blade: Warband.
Read the question dude. He didn't say "Best game of all time."
I just bought Crusader Kings 2 a few days ago on that Steam sale, but I haven't played it yet. I forgot that a friend of mine gifted me Europa Universalis 3 months ago, so I figured I would start there. Let me say that the tutorials in this game don't really teach you anything, I've been having to rely on Youtube videos. Actually while I'm at it, any tips would be greatly appreciated (or a link to a thorough tutorial).
Out of the ones you posted I would have to go with CK2. It is the "easiest" and "most accessible" of the three. My personal favorite is Europa Universalis 3 however. I looked into HoI3 and even already having a bit of grand strategy experience that just seemed like too much for me. I played a little Victoria 2 and it just wasn't my thing. @SathingtonWaltz Check out http://www.paradoxian.org some of the articles on the wiki have not been updated to the newest expansion but it can still be a helpful site. Also I am FAR from an expert but I can try to provide some advice based on my experience if you have any specific questions.
@SathingtonWaltz said:
I just bought Crusader Kings 2 a few days ago on that Steam sale, but I haven't played it yet. I forgot that a friend of mine gifted me Europa Universalis 3 months ago, so I figured I would start there. Let me say that the tutorials in this game don't really teach you anything, I've been having to rely on Youtube videos. Actually while I'm at it, any tips would be greatly appreciated (or a link to a thorough tutorial).
@SathingtonWaltz: Here's something that I wrote about getting into Paradox games in another thread a few days ago.
@GloomyTangent said:
@BoG: There's some really good guides out there (and I'm hardly an expert myself) for EU3. That said, I think that you should try CK2 first, then move on up to EU. CK has a much smaller scale (particularly if you play a lesser noble), and since it's more personality focused it's easier to get into it like you would get into the Sims. That's one thing that's really hard to get into new players heads, is that honestly the games are often a lot more like the Sims than Civ. Sometimes you just need to let it go. Every once in a while you'll need to pause and micromanage an aspect of your economy, or put down a revolt, or whatever, but a significant part of the fun of these games (particularly CK) is just letting the game go and seeing what crazy shit happens.
If you keep that in mind, the fact that the game has no win state really becomes a lot more comfortable. I just like to set hilarious, ahistorical goals and see how that shit goes. For example, in EU3 I once played as England from the very start of the available timeline, roleplaying an irrational hatred of the Portugese. 150 years later, the King of Portugal had fled to the Azores, which had 30 settlers and 50 natives on it. I decided to let him keep it, because fuck Portugal. Keep in mind that during this game I figured out how the tech transfer and cultural assimilation stuff worked. Just by playing and letting things go. I still have no fucking clue how the trade agreements or anything work. Maybe eventually I'll play the Dutch or Swiss or someone and actually put in the effort, role playing as a trading power, but for now it just doesn't interest me. Would I play EU 'better' if I understood it? Sure. But I don't care, I was too busy grudgefucking Portugal into submission.
Basically, don't feel you have to win to have a good time. You're going to fuck things up, and in fact should. Because it's hilarious.
Oh, and stay the fuck away from Hearts of Iron until you have a good handle on Paradox stuff. Their games are ridiculous enough without having to manage a bunch of NATO unit symbols and supply lines.
The guides are good, but I find that the right mindset is more important than anything.
@Rohok said:
@TaliciaDragonsong said:
Mount and Blade: Warband.This.
mount and blade isn't a paradox game it's a taleworlds game goddamned people
also EU3 is the best with mods; my favorite mod is the colony name changer mod, so when I colonized north america as Norway instead of new york I got new oslo :3
The only correct answer is Victoria II. In most other paradox grand strategy games, war is the catalyst which holds together the rest of the game. In Victoria II, it's all about political and economic stability. War is but a means, one of many tools to reach that stability & I found it infinitely rewarding.
Also I love how 'realistic' the game is. Certain countries have huge advantages, but the alliances keeps things balanced.
@TaliciaDragonsong said:
@Animasta: Just like all those EA games aren't EA games but just published by EA.
yeah but he listed three games developed by paradox development studio so I assume he meant to say that (it is an easy mistake to make)
@GloomyTangent said:
@SathingtonWaltz: Here's something that I wrote about getting into Paradox games in another thread a few days ago.
@GloomyTangent said:
@BoG: There's some really good guides out there (and I'm hardly an expert myself) for EU3. That said, I think that you should try CK2 first, then move on up to EU. CK has a much smaller scale (particularly if you play a lesser noble), and since it's more personality focused it's easier to get into it like you would get into the Sims. That's one thing that's really hard to get into new players heads, is that honestly the games are often a lot more like the Sims than Civ. Sometimes you just need to let it go. Every once in a while you'll need to pause and micromanage an aspect of your economy, or put down a revolt, or whatever, but a significant part of the fun of these games (particularly CK) is just letting the game go and seeing what crazy shit happens.
If you keep that in mind, the fact that the game has no win state really becomes a lot more comfortable. I just like to set hilarious, ahistorical goals and see how that shit goes. For example, in EU3 I once played as England from the very start of the available timeline, roleplaying an irrational hatred of the Portugese. 150 years later, the King of Portugal had fled to the Azores, which had 30 settlers and 50 natives on it. I decided to let him keep it, because fuck Portugal. Keep in mind that during this game I figured out how the tech transfer and cultural assimilation stuff worked. Just by playing and letting things go. I still have no fucking clue how the trade agreements or anything work. Maybe eventually I'll play the Dutch or Swiss or someone and actually put in the effort, role playing as a trading power, but for now it just doesn't interest me. Would I play EU 'better' if I understood it? Sure. But I don't care, I was too busy grudgefucking Portugal into submission.
Basically, don't feel you have to win to have a good time. You're going to fuck things up, and in fact should. Because it's hilarious.
Oh, and stay the fuck away from Hearts of Iron until you have a good handle on Paradox stuff. Their games are ridiculous enough without having to manage a bunch of NATO unit symbols and supply lines.
The guides are good, but I find that the right mindset is more important than anything.
The guide that Animasta linked me to was fantastic, and I watched a few LP's as well. My understanding of the game has improved immensely since then and I'm thoroughly enjoying my current game as Castille. And yes, it sounds strange but I know exactly what you mean in reference to "the right mindset". It took me a little while to get out of that "Civilization" style mindset and instead of treating the games combat as "super Chess" (what I usually refer to Civ V's combat as), I treat is as "super Risk". With the "Risk on steroids" mindset I found it easier to understand the games mechanics of war.
EU3 is my favourite, followed by Hearts of Iron 3, then Victoria 2 and finally Crusader Kings 2.
However if I was getting into Paradox games I would go EU3>Vic2>HOI3, I'd actually leave Crusader Kings 2 in its own seperate division given how different it it with the character driven as opposed to Realm/State gameplay. Regardless, if you learn how to play one odds are the others are picked up quickly.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment