Your poll seems to be confusing "lives up to Molyneux's promises" with "is good." And they're not mutually exclusive - Fable didn't live up to Molyneux's promise at all, but it was still a good game.
In reality nothing that he said would be in the game wasn't there, so technically it did live up to the promises. Personally though, not really. While certain parts where freaking awesome, others were lame. If they could ditch dungeons in the main mission and really them in general and make more momemnts like the...jees what's that place called? Ahh... you probably know what I mean.
"Your poll seems to be confusing "lives up to Molyneux's promises" with "is good." And they're not mutually exclusive - Fable didn't live up to Molyneux's promise at all, but it was still a good game."
Point taken, My descriptions are bad. It makes sense if you just use the first word. I really wanted it to be about living up to Peter's high expectations, or not. Not the quality of the game.
I hate the question. Just enjoy the games instead of analyzing if they lived up to some developer talk or not. But still : A: Totally, The game met all my expectations.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along
with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely
increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.
Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other
Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll
send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment