234r2we232

Skyrim is a nice obsessive-compulsive collecting sim, but Saints Row The Third is way more ambitious and memorable :) and that game is ripe with bugs also (none that prevent me from completing game modes or prevailing lag, tho).

I really wouldn't all this "but my modded PC version is perfekt!1" arguments, except for all the bitching that goes on when a poor console port is released.

They should have hired a good voice actor. He was the weakest character of the bunch.

Companions? You mean like werewolves? :P

It's2011,people.ApparentlyWMjustgotthenotification.

(brokenspacebarftl)

EDIT:WMiskindalikeapornsitewhenyouthinkaboutit...lotsofmoustaches.

Sony has trotted out the usual line about now commenting on rumors and speculation

Journalism~!

@bibamatt said:

I hate the word over-rated, but I was hugely disappointed with this game (specifically the level of 'crazy') after that Bombcast. Sure, it's GTA without the boring bits, but it's also GTA without any substance. And that's not to say bits of SR3 aren't stupid fun, but I just found it really easy and super repetitive.

That's funny, because every GTA game I've played has used "substance" to the exact same effect and in the same predictable and tedious way. I've seen enough crime thrillers and South Park episodes to understand GTA's tone, and I'm totally done with it. The gameplay is so thinly layered and shallow (read: like all Rockstar games) and always seems to take a firm backseat to all that important hype and branding. 'Third may be easy, but it is at least it bothers to make it's shortcomings entertaining.

Don't shave, but bring a sword. Intimidation works great during potential work opportunities.

@Berserker976 said:

Also, to all the people whining about Bethesda getting a free pass out of this stuff and saying game journalists are being hypocritical for not being harsher on the bugs: try to keep in mind the scope of this game, and the number of things it has to juggle at once. I'm not saying it's not their fault, but if you really think a few bugs are enough to detract from this game, then you were never going to enjoy it in the first place. People give it a "free pass" because Bethesda games are one-of-a-kind and absolutely amazing apart from the bugs.

If it didn't feel so similar to Fallout 3, I'd say you had a point.

The worst part about it is there's no warning. Even in Fallout 3 it'd always prompt you if something happened. Where as in Skyrim, you can spend however long you like finishing off a room of dudes, and never really know what happens to your follower until after you've gone through it all. It kinda sucks. Not to mention, the two followers I had seemed to do nothing but get killed.

Best thing I ever did in Skyrim was to lose the followers and buy a house.

GOTY.