Something went wrong. Try again later

Akrid

This user has not updated recently.

1397 0 65 90
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

TF2: Falls (PT 3)

Once again, an update on my TF2 map. 
 

No Caption Provided
Last time you heard from me, I was finishing up the conceptualization of my map. I felt I had a pretty strong idea of where I wanted to take it, both visually and gameplay-wise. So this past while, I've been taking everything I've done thus far and remaking it in Hammer, Source engine's editor. That certainly sounds like a stupid task, to redo literally everything I've done again simply for the fact that the data is non-transferable, And to be honest, it is, but I soon learned it was fairly simple one. Free from the requirement of having to think about how to style and construct my map, the task turned in to simple labor, and I finished it quick-smart.
 
When building a map in Hammer, the main tool is a simple device called a "brush", primitive geometry that - using a couple of complimentary tools - are easy to mold into whatever shape is required. The interesting conceit here that makes it quite a bit different than working with regular polygons: There is no option to make a simple plane. That is to say, there is no way to make an object with a hole. 
 
Typical brush room (left) Vs. typical polygonal room (right). On the brush room, the (not pictured) inside faces are the ones that actually are important. 
Typical brush room (left) Vs. typical polygonal room (right). On the brush room, the (not pictured) inside faces are the ones that actually are important. 
See, when working with polygons, the plane is your best friend. When making a wall, that wall does not have to consist of anything more then one face. But when working with brushes, everything has to be a solid shape - no holes. That means the most basic shape you can make is a rectangular prism. This alters the approach slightly between the two methods. For instance, it's bad to have two brush faces overlap, and the solution to this is to have only the one edge of each brush touching. Failure to do so can apparently lead to a performance hit.  
  
 It also changes the simple act of ctrl+click and tap F once (the polygonal way), to making six rectangle and carefully aligning them to make an inner cube, making sure there are no gaps. Sounds kind of ridiculous, no? In truth, there's something appealing to me about this decidedly methodical way of doing things. It really makes you think of exactly what you're doing at all times. The downtime gives me more time to consider what I'm doing, whereas with polygons I start and don't stop for nothin'. There's also the added bonus of not having to worry at all about 5 sided polygons or any of that malarkey. There are few such impeding devices when working with brushes. Or, at least, I haven't encountered many.
 
The room now with
The room now with "nodraw" on all outside faces. We finally achieve the shape that takes about 3 seconds to make polygonally. 
Now, obviously it's an awful waste of resources to have all these polygons (as that is what the brushes are as soon as you're in game) serving no purpose on the "negative" side of the map, the side where with any luck no player will see. That's why it's vital to make sure that the computer doesn't even consider those faces. In source engine, this is done through the "Nodraw" tool, a simple way to tell the computer to ignore the existence of any chosen face of a brush. This once again gives you the ability to have a simple plane. Which, in my opinion, makes this whole system seem a bit crazy. 
  
If you want anything more complicated then a block, then use of the clipping tool would be in order. The clipping tool allows you to cut a brush in to two brushes, at any chosen angle. This allows you to quickly make complicated shapes, though at a certain point it becomes more efficient resource-wise to import a polygonal model in lieu of having 20 brushes defining a complicated shape. 
 
all this plus a simple vertex tool combines into an extremely intuitive modelling system that literally anyone can pick up. I'd even say that this method is far more straightforward then the regular polygonal method, though of course it can't compete when creating objects any more complicated then a hallway. The nature of brushes also lend themselves to extreme accuracy well, which is essential when you're making something that needs to be absolutely seamless. When working in straight 3d, I know that people are only going to see what I am willing to show, so I can be really as sloppy as I can personally stand. Not so here.
 
 Holy image compression Giant Bomb!
 Holy image compression Giant Bomb!
So, applying these tools, I created my map, not straying too far from the original design. There's really nothing more I can say about that. It was extremely straightforward.  
  
 Overall I had a good time working in Hammer: It was quick, intuitive, and easy. Had I been working from scratch, I think the brush method really lends itself well to quick creation of levels. If anything, working fairly strictly from a reference actually impeded my progress a bit. If I ever do another one of these, I probably won't bother with the preliminary conceptualization and instead jump straight in to Hammer.   
 
Having all the vital geometry laid out, I compiled the map and messed around on it with a few friends. I now have my doubts that this map will prove to be interesting and fun in it's current form. I think I have a long way to go to make this map what I want it to be.
 
For those keeping track, I am well past my deadline of August 21st. I meant to post this blog on that day, but my schedule was absolutely packed and I didn't have the time. From then till now, I have been busy moving house (twice) in preparation for college. I'm finally settled in, just in time for classes starting on Wednesday. Regretfully, my schooling probably won't leave me much time to work on this map, and so I'm going to have to put this project on indefinite hold. I'm sorry that I wasn't able to meet the amount of support Giant Bomb showed towards me for this project. But I'll come back to this map some day in the future, and undoubtedly be better equipped to handle it. 
 
In the mean time, you may or may not see some drawings of some kind from me, depending on how satisfied I am with what I accomplish in the next two years. Having never put much effort in to traditional art before, I'm a little fearful of how this will turn out, but excited by the challenge at the same time.  
 
I actually remembered to take pictures this time! So there's a lot of them. I'd recommend going to the slick gallery viewer instead of clicking them individually here, but whatever floats your boat.     
12 Comments