@tikimorpher: I suppose, but from what I've seen they cast a wide net and comb through everything available. In my opinion, the gap between a business and personal online presence is largely irrelevant when it comes to distinguishing between digging and... well I'm not exactly sure what you'd call the alternative.
@austin_walker Sorry if someone has already said something but the statement from Nintendo wasn't dealing with a specific company policy per se but against corporate culture i.e. a company aimed at kids and families primarily. http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/31/technology/nintendo-alison-rapp/
Also there really wasnt much "digging". The paper in question is literally on her Linkedin page. Not exactly internet sleuthing doxxing.
The fact that someone looked through all her social media stuff, even a public Linkedin page, still represents digging to me. Some people may characterize it as "exposing". It's simply the age old tactic of looking for dirt on your opponent. Like, at what point do you think, I need to convince Nintendo to keep boob sliders in, let's look for this marketing person's Linkedin account? Where's the justification there? I just cannot draw the mental line between these two points and come up with any sound reasoning, other than she drew someone's ire, and they wanted to discredit and hurt her.
Everything I've seen about Quantum Break's gameplay has reminded me of Mass Effect, which I remember blended different powers together quite effectively. I wonder why Remedy couldn't take some pointers from that series...
allodude's comments