AngelN7's forum posts

Avatar image for angeln7
#1 Edited by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

There's some amazing stuff in MGS4 like listening to a podcast about the game using your ingame ipod, that alone gets my vote plus is a pretty good game that still holds up.

Avatar image for angeln7
#2 Posted by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

Paradise wasn't even as good as Revenge I don't know how it got this far.

Avatar image for angeln7
#3 Edited by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

I'd vote for Minecraft if we were talking about it in the Beta Days; everything post-release has just turned it into a disappointing, muddled mess with a complete lack of cohesion to the design. They just throw shit into a pot nowadays and it made me completely lose interest.

Yup I feel the same I don't even know how minecraft got this far... remember when Giantbomb or at least the Bombcast used to think this wasn't even a game? I feel the same after the "official" release.

Avatar image for angeln7
#4 Posted by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

Brotherhood by a long shot , I didn't care for anything in Bayonetta other than the combat and I didn't feel like it did anything all that different from DMC3 in terms of combat.

Avatar image for angeln7
#5 Posted by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

MGS4 cuz war changed so Geometry wars don't matter!

Avatar image for angeln7
#6 Posted by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

@missacre said:

Both of these games are an embarrassment, so neither one.

Avatar image for angeln7
#7 Posted by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

So the same day as our president orders to loot major electronic retailers wich then some people procede to do arround the country our miss Venezuela wins another crown... there's a message in there about us being really ugly or something.

Avatar image for angeln7
#8 Edited by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

@belegorm said:

Why fix what's not broken?

Also I think the term "character action" is a dumb term.

Yup! I don't know why the GB staff feels the need to be so contrarian with common terms for describing games, to me those games will always be Hack'n slash.

Avatar image for angeln7
#9 Posted by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

Why do people asume that some of us who think this game doesn't look up to par with the other 2 games of the series are just ok with franchises iterating stuff over and over?. My only gripe with this is the story that they decided to focus on, I just don't care for origin stories most of the time they don't tell anything of interest and aren't all that exciting, the developers keep saying how this is a "younger inexperienced Batman" yet he still kicking ass and being all Batman-y beating thughs,mercenaries like it's nothing, sure maybe Bane breaks his back or Deadstroke beats him on their first encounter in a cutscene but on the gameplay side you still have all the skills and abilities you had in AC so what's the point of it being a prequel? of course they will not remove the gadgets and moves like the dive or the multiple takedown just because he's a younger Batman but still introducing new stuff and new mechanics in a game that is supposed to take place before the first makes really no sense and if the story isn't your incentive to play the game then why not make it a side story? or better yet just move foward.

Avatar image for angeln7
#10 Edited by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

I'm just tired of Origin stories they're so unnecessary and they make no sense gameplay-story wise, if this had been Arkham City 2 I would be all over it.