Something went wrong. Try again later

Beaudacious

This user has not updated recently.

1200 0 17 9
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Beaudacious's forum posts

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Ok, but let's discuss the real plot holes. Did anyone else think that last scene with Danny looked like her head Photoshoped on a stunt double? Maybe the cgi was just bad and made the whole scene look weird.

Also as soon as Sansa and John hugged, my first thought was;"Well they're happy! So when does Sansa die?".

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Beaudacious

To be fair AMD is actually continuously trying new things, the latest being Mantle shifting to an Open platform known as Vulkan. AMD being first to market with HBM memory. AMD making APU's to bring better gaming to the masses in the forms of consoles. While Nvidia is busy trying to get you to buy 144hz monitors, better twitch features, in-game screenshots in VR, and raising prices.

As a company AMD really seems to be trying to innovate in interesting ways, to make gaming more accessible, and less resource intensive. The fact of the matter is any GPU in the last 4 years is hugely powerful, but the Windows and DirectX has been a stranglehold for games. If Vulkan as an open platform takes off, with incorporation into Unity and UE4 it means we could finally be in an age where Windows gaming is no more since Vulkan is cross platform. Even Steam itself has admitted that Vulkan makes way more sense then the lock down that is Directx 12.

So a future where we have more powerful APU's, where you have on chip communication between cpu and gpu. Are running a really efficient open intermediary platform like Vulkan on a Linux box, Windows, Mac ,Chromebook or whatever platform you want? How is that not a great future where you can game on whatever platform you want at a lower cost? In tern making VR more accessible and affordable? And all of that could be attributed to nucleating at AMD.

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@beaudacious said:

I'm tired of realistic, I want stupid fun in my shooters.

So then why be excited about a shooter based on a real conflict, with guns that actually existed, based on battles that actually happened?

Battleborn, Doom, and Overwatch are all out there by the way

I like "good" games. Also sounds like you never played 1942.

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Beaudacious
Loading Video...

I played the shit out of BF3-BF4, tried the Hardline Beta and skipped Hardline and Battlefront. But this looks fucking amazing, especially with the mix of alternate, and realistic WW1 tech. I'm sold, I'm getting 1942 flashbacks. No FPS has been able recapture the stupid fun of 1942 Secret Weapons, and this looks like it might be the shooter.

Hopefully they let us wing surf like the good old days. I'm tired of realistic, I want stupid fun in my shooters.

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Beaudacious

Invade, have half health, vs 3 guys , and host pops Seed of Giant 50% of the time. From payed too much attention to the complainers, and really gutted invasions. People just don't want to bother to learn how to play and just spam R1/RB, then complain when they die. I've been farming Champion Gundyr. After watching host's play, people have zero clue about how to play even though they just spent 40 hours getting to this point. Also the amount of non-stop summons I get has me thinking for every 1 solo boss run, there's 10 co-op boss runs.

Duels have been fine though, backstab fishing is gone, but it's cute how people are parry fishing now. Although once in a while there's the terrible lagger, at that point I just jump off the edge. We should be able to rate connections on duels, so we can then decide to filter by connection quality.

Also SL 120 shouldn't be meta, SL 120 means you make zero sacrifices in your build. People just want to be running "perfect" builds, so they can have 30 int to buff their UGS with Crystal magic Weapon while still rocking 40 vig/end/str. At that point might as well say there is no SL, since everyone can just be amazing at everything.

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

UGS is extremely good for PvE you can break the biggest of guards and slice whole mobs. Most likely you just haven't figure out how to properly use the ultra 2h type weapons.

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Complains all the weapons are the same, yet admits being unwilling to learn how to use anything other then R1 spam.

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Anyone actually using this?

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Beaudacious

@handlas: I don't play with shield ever : D. Rapier and broadsword.

Avatar image for beaudacious
Beaudacious

1200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Is it just me or is the roll timing in DS3 really forgiving compared to DS2? I feel like I can pretty much dodge way early and yet still be in i-frames. It's makes two-handers kind of OP, way more forgiving on the doge + slow windup.