Bindings1

I personally think that after you take base in RUSH the defenders should not be allowed to go passed a certain point kind of like in the beginning of the match when defending you can only go so far into the attackers spawn before you get that death count down. I am tired of all the spawn campers out there. 

To be fair this "piracy" comvo is stupid. We all know renting is not piracy. Renting is what caused piracy lol. Think about it. People were fine paying to rent something at blockbuster or going to the movies. Then they raised prices, then raised them again and again.  Now people go, I am not paying that ridiculous price so I am going to download it. seriously 16.99 for a music cd? after the record companies promised to lower prices because they too said they were over-priced. I will pirate it. Going to the movies with your wife and spending close to $25...Download instead. 

Right now I have 232 total dog tags. No bragging you just asked. 

Ok so this is how i see it and I will be fair to both Developers.  
  
The game play of both games is significantly different. CoD is more of a run and gun shooter where you do not have to work as a squad, so you can be Rambo. BC2 has a lot of strategy build into the maps and you are placed in a squad to work together to achieve the reward. When I play CoD i feel as if I am playing an arcade game where when I play BC2 I feel it is more like real life. 
 
Guns : Both developers did a great job with unlocks and guns you get to use. Although both games react differently when it comes to firing them. CoD allows you to fire an SMG miles away and strait as an arrow while in BC2 an SMG travels only so far and has nice bullet drop. When it comes down to sniping I like CoD so much better. Hold your breath and shoot. While in BC2 its just aim and shoot but allow for the bullet drop. BC2 also has a lot of nice "perks" if you will : armor, magnum ammo, heath pack upgrades, light weight packs, grenade packs, and much more. When you break down the gun selection BC2 has more of a variety to choose from which is nice.  
 
Maps : As a person that has played both games I see an even playing field. Graphically both games have beautiful maps. The pace of gameplay and settings are great. I can't say much more than that when it comes to the maps. One thing i have noticed is that in CoD it's hard to hide in a bush because you are still visible and do not really blend in, when in BC2 you blend into the bush really well. That is for everyone who likes to camp I for one prefer not to.  
 
Vehicles : BC2 has some really nice vehicles to utilize in the maps and game modes. Helicopters are by far the most lethal. I am not saying thats a good thing or bad thing. For those of you out their that can fly them I applaud you because I for one cannot. CoD only has vehicles as perks but they are not something you really get to experience the true power and mobility of. Again not saying that is good nor bad.  
 
Community : From what I have noticed both communities are fun people. You have your fanboys for each developer. I agree both games should be allowed to exist and the rift people are causing between others is disturbing. I am tired of the "this games better" no  "this one is" It is really annoying. It's too early to tell but BC2 has not been infected with hacks like what I have seen and witnessed in CoD. I think it is a matter of time before we see that in the BC2 world. While I love video games, I think that anyone who hacks for their benefit is cowardly and is not good enough to compete in a fair environment. (Personal Opinion)  
 
BAD THINGS : Both games have bad elements to them. Right now its the hackers in CoD. In BC2 it's the overpowered M60 and 40MM Grenade Noobtubers.  
 
Conclusion : Both games have their Ups and Downs. I play both, I like both. If I am in the mood for a No Thinking Shooter I play CoD, but if I want to play something with depth I pop in BC2. Right now BC2 is filled with CoD players like myself that have yet to break the habit of running around by yourself trying to get things down instead of working as a team like it is meant to be played. Luckily I have plenty of friends that yell at me when I am doing that lol. Anyways these are my thoughts and I know some of you out their are going to haggle me and bash me because of my views on both games. 

" I think an ammo icon would be a good idea. I'm surprised it's not actually in the game in the first place, to be honest. But regardless, you can almost always take a risk and drop the box for an ally. Odds are, if they've fired at all, the ammo will be helpful. "

" @SilentCommando: Yeah, making it show up for a last clip or rocket would be a really good idea. :) "

@SilentCommando

" How come there aren't any icons on the minimap telling assault players who needs ammo? Medics have this so they know who needs bandaids or a revive, but not assault players. Just a minor gripe I have. "

I dont mind the revive/. I mind the revive when surrounded by enemies. Whats the point if after I am revived I die again.... I know. POINTS....since a vast majority of people in the game join up with a random group of people all they care about is points. No common sense at all. Since it counts as a death regardless if you revive me or not let me respawn if my body is surrounded. Medics and their points.

No its not. like project343 said, you're only supposed to buy stuff very rarely. As in: when you desperately need them. And I always find myself having enough cash.   

I must say that this game yes has repetitive missions but the the scale of the entire island is massive.  To be fair the graphics are better than average. I am willing to sacrifice awesome graphics for a massive world to explore. It's a fair trade in my book. 

I have to be honest there are plenty more things that are funnier than that but good job I laughed so.... 1 clap for effort

I agree 75,000 for the Monster truck and an average of 30,000 for other vehicles are rediculous