Something went wrong. Try again later

blindx0r

This user has not updated recently.

60 0 0 0
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

blindx0r's forum posts

  • 20 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm starting to think Marvel's Spider-Man might be the classic "game (almost) everyone likes but no one loves enough to fight for" game. A lot of people on the staff liked it, but I'm not sure it's going to be anyone's favorite. Hard to imagine it not making the top 10, but it kept sliding down my top 8 as I thought of new games, until I took it off entirely.

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

1) Dead Cells

2) Red Dead Redemption 2

3) God of War

4) Tetris Effect

5) Hitman 2

6) Into the Breach

7) Dragonball Fighterz

8) Monster Hunter World

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@valjean9430: Sure, the number of big games, or games they find super interesting, that come out each month is going to vary year to year, but I looked through the July 2014 quick looks (when they did 42 in a month). You can do so as well here:

http://qlcrew.com/?vid_type=ql&hlt=any&game_id=any&platforms=any&length=0&maxlen=inf&per_page=15&date_from=2014-07-01&date_to=2014-07-31&anyone=anyone&inc%5B0%5D=&exc%5B0%5D=&p=1

There's Unfinisheds of 2 big games (Destiny and The Crew) that I assume were having public betas at the time, and maybe there's nothing similar this month (I honestly don't know, I don't keep track of betas that closely), but that's 2 games. Looking through the other 40 games, there's a lot of obscure stuff in there, the equivalent of which I'm sure you could find on Steam today. I don't buy that there was double the number of games that would make good quick looks in July of that year compared to this one.

Also, they've repeatedly said that they think 2014 was a fairly week year for games (which is why Shadow of Mordor won GOTY and Destiny made the top 10), whereas they praised the hell out of 2017. But they did Quick Looks/Unfinisheds of 336 games in 2014 and only 238 in 2017. If there were a 100 more inherently "quick-lookable" games in 2014, was it really that weak? But I don't think that was their reasoning in doing more QLs, and there wasn't actually a bunch more games in that year they simply had to cover. It only makes sense to me as them deliberately ramping up the number of QLs they did as part of a strategy for the site by digging deeper into obscure Steam titles, and then deciding that it wasn't worth it and scaling back, which I believe Jeff has confirmed.

And hey, that's fine, if no one is watching QLs of Pure Pool and Super Comboman (actual QLs from July 2014), then I can see why they'd prefer to spend their time elsewhere. But I personally like it when they dig a little deeper in what they cover.

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sethmode said:
@devise22 said:

I feel like every year around summer this type of question gets asked, and every year people make like it's some new thing. Don't get me wrong, if you'd like to see more Quick Looks of lesser known things during the summer month, I think that is absolutely a constructive suggestion (if delivered as such). But the impression that it's some new thing and this site is changing that comes with this every year, give me a break.

This site doing longer playthroughs of games for Premium Features, or "Gimmicks" as Premium Features like Demo Derby Ranking of Fighters etc is super long standing. Demo Derby and RoF are both in the same vein as Flight Club, Old PC Games, TNT. And it doesn't matter if it is Yakuza or Shenmu or Until Dawn or do I need to keep listing? For years this site has output premium features dedicated to more extensive longer looks at games. And for years the QL schedule has been heavier during the early parts of the year, dryer during the summer and then a bit heavier again during the fall as more games get released. But the longer playthrough stuff has always been constantly heavy throughout the year except for during E3.

This is a good post. To piggyback slightly, the July after the OP joined the site (July 2013) there were 7 Quick Looks between the 1st and the 18th. We've had 9 this year. So I do think it's a matter of perspective likely mixed with a little bit of nostalgia.

So, I too feel like there are less quick looks these days. I remember there being weeks, a couple years ago, that when both East and West were cranking they'd have 2 quick looks every weekday and 1 each on the weekend days. That's a good pace to me, because quick looks are primarily what I'm here for. I listen to some non-GB video game podcasts, but this is the only video game site I frequent, so I want to know what's good to play from these guys. Of course, they never kept up that pace for long, because something (PAX, E3, GOTY, Extra Life, etc) would come along every so often and disrupt the schedule, but it was nice when it happened.

I even remember Jeff addressing this on a (I think) Bombcast a couple months ago and saying they consciously decided to scale back the QLs because of the (lack of) traffic on some of the lesser known games. Of course, they do still QL lesser known games when they want to, but I think they've decided not to QL stuff just to fill the schedule or feel like they have to QL every semi-interesting game that comes out, because it may not be worth the effort versus the other stuff they can do. Which is completely understandable, but I, personally, would still like the old schedule. Of course, I don't remember what Bombcast that was that Jeff said that, so I have no cite for you.

But, just to prove to myself that I wasn't imagining this, some numbers from qlcrew. Number of quick looks for each July (including unfinisheds):

Jul 2009: 15

Jul 2010: 26

Jul 2011: 29

Jul 2012: 28

Jul 2013: 20

Jul 2014: 42

Jul 2015: 28

Jul 2016: 23

Jul 2017: 23

Jul 2018: 12 so far (counting the 2 on the schedule that haven't been shown yet).

The first quick look was in August, 2008, so, coincidentally, the month you compared this one to was the slowest July since the first year of the site. And the way this month is going, it looks like it will rival it. They could definitely ramp up more QLs if they wanted to; yes there's not a lot of big games coming out, but there wasn't in July 2014 either. There's been plenty of times I've been looking at the new games on the Switch E-Store or Steam where I see something smaller I wish they had looked at, so I could have gotten a better idea of what the game is like. And yes, I could search youtube or something for footage, but I come here so I don't have to.

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@humanity:

I personally had almost 0 problems when playing FO4. Some bad pathing by the AI companions, but that's about it. I put over 100 hours into the game and I don't remember encountering any bugs. (I also wasn't stupid enough to play the game on a console, so my performance was fine.) That's in very sharp contrast to New Vegas, a game that Jeff praised, which was a technical abomination in my experience (I encountered tons of bugs and it kept crashing to desktop every couple hours, even after being patched), and quite a bit better than Skyrim and FO3.

Is stating my good experience with the game "giving it a pass". Do I need to be outraged over the bugs people claim to have encountered, but I didn't?

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't like Let's Plays of long, narrative focused games. I think the only one of those they're doing currently is Yakuza 0, which I don't watch. Just like I didn't watch Metal Gear Scanlon before it. Let's Plays of shorter games (like some of the old adventure games they've done), or less narrative focused games (Megaman, Super Mario Sunshine) I'm generally OK with.

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@alavapenguin:

Guess what I don't want to see when I click on a thread about a new staff member? People shoe-horning their political complaints about past staff members into a topic where it's completely irrelevant. If you want to spend your time talking about that, fine, but please don't shit up threads on new topics with that kind of stuff.

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Thanks for your replies. I think I might just go for it this time, although I'm not a 100% sure yet.

One more question though: When I go to the store, it says that Blackrock Mountain and League of Explorers are going to leave the shop soon. When is "soon"? When "Journey to Un'Goro" launches? And what if I buy the first wing of each of those expansions with the gold I have earned? Will the rest still not be purchasable afterwards anymore or have I then bought myself the chance to still buy the rest at a later point in time?

BRM and LoE will no longer be purchasable when the rotation happens, which is whenever Un'Goro comes out (sometime on the 6th). If you have one (or more) wings of those adventures though, then you can still buy the rest at a later date.

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@redhotchilimist

It matters in the sense that developers live and die by metacritic scores.

Jeff and Alex said (paraphrasing) that while that's still true for some developers, it's becoming less and less of a thing.

@paulmako

Steam's 'Recent' reviews for No Man's Sky are sitting at 8% Positive - 92% Negative.

Yeah, I'll glance at user reviews on Steam, but they rarely matter to me, because it's too easy for some group of people with a hate on for a game to bomb the score over something I don't give a fuck about. NMS may be a bad game (I don't know, I haven't played it, not sure that I ever will), but even it's overall score atm (31%) suggests the game is worse than, say, Raven's Cry or Guise of the Wolf. I find that hard to believe.

For another example, Mafia 3 has a bad score (48% currently) at least in part because it released with a 30 fps lock they patched out after a week, but not before a bunch of PC uber alles fanboys rushed to give the game a bad review. If you know the game has a fps lock and that's not acceptable to you, why are you buying the game in the first place? Oh, right, because the publisher has to be "punished" with a low score. I buy most of my games for $5 during Steam sales two years after release. The state of the game on release is meaningless to me, and yet those scores will always be there.

Anyway, to answer the question: Video game reviews never mattered.

Avatar image for blindx0r
blindx0r

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hey. I'm lvl 40, about 450 matches played in QM, but I'm looking for more people to group with. I'm not going to go back and friend request everyone's b.net id in this thread, as I imagine a lot of people aren't still playing HotS. But if you are, feel free to add Blindy#1796.

  • 20 results
  • 1
  • 2