CaptainQuizno

"trophyhunter said:

"TheFreeMan said:

"Well, I guess it's fine then.Gotta take in the individuals skill as well. Do they account for that or just look at the weapons and pit the fighters together, assuming that they're as good as eachother?"

  you mean like how well can the ninja throw stuff if he misses alot?"

Sorta. Like, a certain specific Ninja might be stronger and faster and be a better fighter than a certain specific Spartan, or vice versa."

I've watched this show alot, iv taken computer classes and i understand the software that they use. So heres my Reply: Knight vs Pirate, Pirate wins simply because of the pirates outstanding range capability from long-med. Think about what your missing here. The Knight has armor but the pirate has projectile weapons beyond the knights firepower... years ahead in projectile weapons.. He is capable of delivering massive amounts of destruction from a long range. For instance. A musket or pistol or even the hand held cannon would purely destroy the knight. In war the only factor that matters is how hard you can hit your enemy and from what range. In WW1 soldiers didnt fear the opposing enemy they feared they're artillery. In every great war the side with the best long range weapon always won unless they were witted out. An example of that is Troy the movie. You cannot destroy your enemy if they are out of your reach. The knight has... for the most part spiked balls and a Crossbow. The crossbow packs a punch *though very accurate* does not stand a chance against the pure devestating power of a pirates long range weapon. So going back to the fact that a knight has armor, there is no doubt in my mind that the Pirate wouldnt win. The knight....He's slow, bulky, mask inhibits vision, and i simply think that his armor couldnt handle the shear power of a projectile. Thats my responce to people hating on Pirates.