Createme

Video game reviews are very diverse. For example, Ninja Gaiden 2 has had a diverse range of positive and negative reviews, each critic highlighting good and bad sides of the game, but I was unable to make a solid choice to buy this game becasue of the diverse critisim that I was reading, and sometimes when a critic complained about the gameplay maechanices when somone else was paraised it. This diverse critisim has happened in many games, such as Hellgate London, Clive Barker's Jericho and Army of Two.

My main question is, how does an individual purchase a game when there are many different reviews revealing a broad and sometimes conflicting positive and negative aspects of the video game? Does the final score of the critic heavily depned on your choosing of the game? How do you approach critising a video game? Love to know what you think

OK, Just putting it out there. If you had a game that consisted of you controlling a homosexual man or woman, would you continue playing or would you stop. As I was reading the forums in this area, no one really brought up the concept, and I haven't really come across a game that controlled a homosexual character, particularly a homosexual male, but I haven't played every single game in the world so I could be wrong, but I want to know what all of you guys think? Would you play a homosexual character whether if it's male or female? Would you stop and shy away from the game? Does you views on Homosexuals influence your views on homosexual characters i video games, Love to know what you think!!!

Recently, I have heard that Fable 2 and Little-Big Planet are having certain problems, I think Little-Big Planet is having a problem with the Z Axis. Anyway, the only way to combat this problem is to release a patch after it's initial release. Now, the main question is do you think a game should be finished properly before it's release (which could cause a delay), or do you think these actions of patching up a game after it's release acceptable?