A city-wide Dark Zone would've made the entire game feel like a pressure cooker. Even just occasionally seeing another human player run up and help you take down a side mission at random would've been a huge inclusion.
Man that would kill the game for me. Dark Zone is very tense, I can't be in it for that long without needing a break. It'd be cool if Friendly Fire was off and people showed up in the rest of the game though
@azrailx: I disagree. Even with a full team of colonels with the best weapons/items/armor and near the end game I'm still coming out of a lot of missions with 3-4 dudes wounded on the regular. That just isn't something that happened in Enemy Unknown.
Tinfoil hat theory says that many people that didn't even play the game voted for it. No way to add any credence to it, unless somebody fesses up to doing this.
I didn't play it, but I voted for it.. Even I, who finds no nostalgia and little enjoyment out of Mario, could see how it was fun and interesting this game became. You could chalk it up to just Jeff, Dan, and Patrick's 'enthusiasm' for the game being infectious; yet it was a demonstration of the palpable power -25 years in the making- of fan's desire to make their own levels too. I respect Mario games without liking them, but I can doubly respect that a "maker" fans wanted that was beyond a dream came true.
I voted for that and Life is Strange despite not playing either cause they brought me a lot of enjoyment this year through the site and Patrick's youtube.
@alexw00d: You misunderstand. Given the way the system is laid out a user can only vote for 10 games. If it appears on a list(The second ranking) then it should get at least 1 point per list its on. That means if a game appears on 5000 lists it should score at least 5000 even if every single list put it in the 10 spot.
Come on, man. I know hyperbole is the big thing these days but Al Qaeda is a terrorist organization. The IRA was/is a terrorist organization. ISIS is a terrorist organization.
Comparing actual terrorism to a few pissed off geeks on a message board? That's downright delusional.
I wouldn't go so far as to say 'terrorists' but real people were chased from their homes in terror by those ginned up by the hashtag movement's nebulous goals of 'journalism ethics' - a mindset replete with war imagery and (metaphorical) calls to arms. Sloughing harassment off as 'geeks on a message board' lines up with the blinkered 'The internet isn't real' ethos of channers and the like.
The Internet is not real. If anyone is harassing me I can very easily sever the line of communication to what's bothering me. Everyone has that power. You have that power.
I'll say it again: someone being an asshole on twitter is not terrorism. Harassment, yes, but terrorism? Hysteria like this does nothing for anybody. Unless you like drama, in which case by all means.
A person makes their living off of being on the internet. Now tell them again to sever that line like it's nothing.
defaultprophet's comments