@Luthorcrow: Calling that show sci-fi is like calling harry potter sci-fi. It wasn't intelligent, well written, or crafted well besides the very first episode.
Lost was a terrible excuse for a show. The writers kept saying they would somehow tie all the pieces together, answer questions, and give a satisfying conclusion. The reason I don't want it associated with Mass effect is because Mass effect never had to really tie pieces together, most things were fully explained or given to you in a codex. Lost was just some classic TV writing. "TUNE IN NEXT WEEK TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT!" without any real direction. Mass Effect had a plan, I think the ending was only bad in three because bioware shipped a product in less time than they needed to complete it because who cares if they fuck up the third game. It was probably about money.
Mass effect 1 had an awesome story with a bunch of cool plot twists and a satisfying ending. Mass effect 2 had an awesome story with a bunch of cool plot twists and a satisfying ending with the exception of the giant human reaper. Mass effect 3 gave conclusion to conflicts that probably should never have been completely solved in one single game, but the over all immediate conflict had a half assed ending.
Log in to comment