I came to echo the people who are encouraging a moderate approach to voting. No, I don't want them to just start the whole process off by voting. The early round of eliminations is usually pretty brief and agreeable; someone brings up a game they are sure won't make the cut, most people agree, and then the game is never heard from again.
Voting would greatly accelerate the process, though, in some places that desperately need it. I love Brad and Austin, but they truly mucked up these debates when in successive years they planted their feet stubbornly for games that either nobody liked or that nobody played. That caused the 10th spot to become an endless debate between people with vastly different passions trying to squeak in games that don't have a lot of sway with anyone but themselves. Had they voted this year, the two hour tug of war between Dream Daddy and Yakuza would have been solved in much less time. Let Abby make her pitch for Dream Daddy and Alex make his pitch for Yakuza once (not one thousand times), vote, and then be done with it.
What they do now is hardly better than a vote because I don't truly believe anyone picks a side based on which argument they think is better; I think they just pick the side that seems less likely to back down based on hours of evidence. Ben and Jeff both said that they were swayed by the arguments for Dream Daddy, but it seemed to me like they were more swayed by the fact that Alex and Dan are seasoned veterans and know when to give up the fight. That's not exactly the recipe for an authentic staff top ten.
Plus, the one time they did vote (but ignored the results by and large), Steamworld Dig 2 and maybe Uncharted would have made the top ten, which would have been a win for everybody! :)
Log in to comment