DoYouEvenPraise

@cmblasko: I certainly do not support the use of nuclear weapons, but let me ask you a question.

Assume that we were on good terms with russia, china, etc as people appear to believe will be the case with Trump as the president. If we used a nuclear weapon against an enemy who did not have one (Iran or iraq for a recent example) to retaliate with and our allies would not launch one back at us, what negative consequences would we face?

Oh no how could anyone possibly hold a different opinion than I do? It's impossible that I am the one who is wrong.

Stopping immigration from dangerous areas of the world is not banning or deporting all muslims. The safety of our people comes first.

Enforcing immigration laws is not deporting those who are here legally.

He has publicly supported the LGBT community whereas Hillary takes "donations" from countries that support death for LGBT people and in the past supported anti-LGBT ideas.

Where do you even get the ideas that Trump is some radical racist? Never once has he spoken negatively about whites, blacks, hispanics , etc. Illegal is not a race and neither is Islam.

He's no saint but you're a fool for believing half of the garbage being posted here. Your lives are not in danger. You will not be forcibly removed from your homes. You are legal citizens and you are protected by our laws.

@newhuman: Self defense, hunting for food, sport, hobby?

A terrible tragedy that's going to be used to push various agendas.

The gun is just a tool for the person's goal. Hammers don't swing themselves.

Here's the situation.

I bought GTAV day one, for PS3, at full price with no knowledge that a PC version or even a next-gen version would be released.

Therefore, as I already own the game, I do not feel obligated to pay another 60 dollars for a digital version of a game I already own and would have purchased on this platform had I known it would exist.

What is your opinion on this matter?

There is nothing venomous about recognizing a person doing what they have to do to get by, even if it means sacrificing some principles here or there.

I'm not saying that's what happened in this case though.

What good stuff?

I can't say I saw eye to eye with Patrick on most topics, but hopefully he can bring a meaningful presence to the site and do more than post click-bait articles like the majority of their "journalists" do.