Best replies are rewarded with the honour of giving the best reply. Maybe added in the post.

Thanks for a lot of good insights.
 
Sure, I can see that a small staff has to make their tactics different. I'm not complaining that they are doing a bad job, because they clearly aren't! But even if they are doing their best, they still have to fill the niece they have created for themselves. They ultimately rely on high quality analysis of everything "game". I'd just like to see those hard earned skills come to use in some more developer/publisher interviews, that's all.

I'm an avid reader of video- game news. Giant Bomb has been my friend since they started. The page's wiki based knowledge archive, some of the best reviews of the business and it's informal style are all trademarks that keep pulling attention. But the refresh rate i slooow. 
The holliday season was slow all over, but as the pace has picked up again on blogs like kotaku, gametrailers, Giant Bomb has lagged behind. Even Bayonetta doesn't have a vido review!  
 
Leaving the verdict out on Darksiders doesn't help either. And I'm wondering. Is this the result of a slow pace, or a more meticulous approach to reviewing? I'm hoping for the latter. Because Giant Bomb doesn't have anything to offer other than the occasional update now and then. I'm going to stop coming back. 
 
Many of those now working at Giant Bomb came from gamespot, and while I was delighted at the modernisation of many of gamespots qualities, Giant Bomb failed to bring on the eccelent inverviews.  
 
I'm hoping Giant Bomb will find new ways to bring new and good content to the site, or I believe it will see a decline in visits.

Hey
 
I'd just like to tell you of two amazing photo's in the Lucy Stillman page, revealing the new "modern" environment in the AC franchise.
Live and let live!

I believe the count on sensible reviews on metacritic for this game has now passed 70. And yet none of those reviews have given the game a score below nine out of ten. Seldom do you see a so unanimous approval of a video game title. As you have no doubt read plenty about the game's structure, gameplay and outstanding graphics I choose here under merely to elaborate a bit on the storyrtelling.

The story senters around the personality of the game character. What is amazing is that with a few exceptions his character nearly does not evolve during the whole game. He is, who he is. As an experienced adult and adventurer, he has already been put through many situations that  has been able to shape his character, and now what the game does, is play his character against several others in order to portray various sides of our protagonist. His personality is balansed on several scales where he realistically falls a bit of sentre everytime. As some sociologists point out, you need not be one or the other only, but the two sides can play upon one another rather like counterpoint in songs. He ranges from opportunistic to loyal, from revengeful to forgiving, from masculine to romantic and so on. The only point where he does not at all let go, is of his humour. In fact, the whole game keeps a light hearted tone, almoast all the way through, a trait which is carried over to the graphics, which, as well as having been improved drastically in it's sequel, as also taken on a tint of cartooniness.

There is also a sort of duality to him externally, which is that he acts whimsical but is an expert shot, athlete and historian.

I'll round off with a short message to mr. Desilets: THIS character i rolle played. If there were any invisible walls in this game, I wouldn't know, because it never occured to me to look anywhere else than where Nathan would. But who wants to identify with an introverted self absorbed asshole who never, ever changes his clothes even after a hot ride across the desert, even if he has a changing room! There is a fine line between exotic and outlandish. A very fine line.

Hey.
This key was released in game informer together with the rest of the images.