endless_void's forum posts

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#1  Edited By endless_void

@Baillie: I'm willing to trade a steam account with dota 2 on it for your bnet with sc2, not a big fan of dota so if you're up for the trade lemme know.

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#3  Edited By endless_void

@JJOR64 said:

Jeff streams in his spare time. Like right now! :O

http://www.twitch.tv/gbjg

This is what I like to see, I don't care about any flashy video editing, I just want to see the editors stream/upload some vods of the games they play in their own time.

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#4  Edited By endless_void

@BrockNRolla said:

@endless_void said:

I think this is just a plea for the endurance run in disguise.

Ha, I hadn't actually been thinking that during the original post, but upon consideration, you have a point. An endurance run, for whatever the time sink it may be, is guaranteed daily content. Maybe the page views don't bear out the time, but it certainly makes the site feel more content rich.

I totally agree, although the term endurance run raises the expectations alittle too far in my opinion. Perhaps a video feature specific to one member? I wouldn't mind watching Jeff (or any one of the GB staff) play a runthrough of Amnesia and put that up onto the site (or even better, stream it). Even if it's once or twice a week of 20-40 minute segments, would be great content and hell doesn't even require the person to be at the office. All you need is a webcam and something like XSplit. Other ideas include possibly some sc2 laddering from Brad, or maybe Vinny doing a runthrough of some old rpg. Honestly it doesn't matter what it is, because most of the community will watch it for their personalities anyway.

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#5  Edited By endless_void

I think this is just a plea for the endurance run in disguise.

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#6  Edited By endless_void

Empire: Total War

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#7  Edited By endless_void

-Gta 4 aged terribly, recently tried ps3 version again, and I don't think I could do another runthrough of that game ever again.

-Original assassin's creed, despite being a fresh new idea when it first came out, is extremely repetitive in today's game design. I still like the graphics however.

-San Andreas, another gta game that really hasn't aged well. The graphics for that game are terrrrrrible now, but the core gameplay is still fun. Very tedious missions however.

-The first crysis has aged bad imo. The graphics were amazing for its time but somehow they seem quite average for an action fps now. The mods for that game are fantastic though.

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#8  Edited By endless_void

@Raven10: I also think the sheer amount of predictability in what software may be announced is also a part of this. Hell, I didn't know a damn thing about a new splinter cell before e3, but I honestly wasn't surprised one bit when I saw it

Same goes for medal of honor.

Same goes for call of duty BO2.

Same goes for New Super Mario Bros WiiU (or whatever its called).

Same goes for Crysis 3.

etc.

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#9  Edited By endless_void

@Ares42 said:

@endless_void:The "mainstream-ification" has only to do with where the business has been going. I think Jeff illustrated it pretty well when he described this years conferences as average. As a long-time E3 participant he's just used to this stuff. Remember things like how Sonys conferences used to be like 50% showing numbers and talking about how PS2 was awesome. The shows have never been anything amazing, all the hype was just the game reveals (which again, now are already revealed during broadcasted pre-shows etc).

I think the mainstream audiences have become a major part of the video game industry, products like wii fit, dance central, appeal to them, etc. What I find peculiar is that this is a convention attracting a majority of core games (being most of the press and the thousands of us watching this online)....However I feel like the focus at these conferences is that mainstream content, which isn't geared for the dedicated gamers like us.

Perhaps the reasoning behind this kind of content being shown is companies like Sony wanted to avoid the company's earnings reports (which I actually enjoyed listening to) and replaced that with things like ps move titles or the party games. I'm just thinking back to the 2006 conferences and even though Sony made a joke of themselves at that conference, I still feel like the big three had something to show and it was exciting. 2006 marked the year of a new generation of consoles as well which automatically made it filled with lots of hardware announcements and we were finally shown what these new consoles were capable of. 2005 was the same for microsoft. I just hope when ps4/next xbox is announced, that the shift in focus is back onto the core gamer.

Avatar image for endless_void
endless_void

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

30

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#10  Edited By endless_void

@Ares42 said:

The reason E3 lost is hype is pretty simple. Broadcasting. It's just a lesson of reality now that we as consumers get to see how lame the shows really are instead of just read about "the awesome gaming convention".

Not true, e3 has changed alot since SpikeTV/G4, and web streaming started to bring in huge numbers of people. The big three are realizing that there is no point in appealing specifically to the core audience as mainstream audiences are a large part of the viewership as well. E3 has changed in its definition over the years in terms of the convention as well. Pre-2007 e3 was still the best kind, after the convention was scaled to be much smaller, the ESA has been trying to find something inbetween the pre-2007 e3 and the 2007 e3, which were a huggggeeeee contrast.