" @AgentJ:   What exactly did I generalize?  I generalized a consistence in gameplay styles on the Wii, because there is a large majority of the library founded on that gimmicky gameplay style.  Did I ever say that all wii games suck?  no.  Did I ever say that Wii controls cause Wii games to suck? no.  Just to point out, one generalization does not equal another, so please tell me your not making that argument.  Again your ignorant assumptions scare me.  Some how by my past comment I am now thrown into the "WIii games suck because they not advanzors and too waggly", come on now.  I made my point very clear about my feeling on "Warrant of a purchase" and not about the relevancy of appeal of the consol..... in fact I believe I specifically stated "I understand the appeal".    Your conclusions are baseless and very annoying.  You sir are too defensive of the Wii and have somehow insulted me with your assumptions, thats impressive indeed seeing as I'm normally a laid back guy.    ps  Not sure why I'm so pissed off right now, I guess its just a huge pet peeve of mine to be brushed of as benighted for no real reason, its like a superiority complex just walked in the room and started pissing on people (dont ask). "

" @Linkyshinks said:

" Yeah all such views are totally idiotic in my eyes, for a number of reasons.  
 
  
The claims that it would play better on 360 are dumb, how could it with the shittest D-pad (ever made on a popular console) of all the consoles and it's loose analog?  This game requires responsive tight controls.
 
 
The game looks awesome in every respect already, it would benefit very little with HD output, apart from appealing to HD hoars.  There's a good interview on the Vanillaware's page that explains why it's on Wii.- Vannilaware dont care about HD graphics, they see the game as stunning without them and easier to contruct on Wii through programming.     ... "

This gets my vote as the most sensible comment on this thread.  "

" @Branthog said:

I love great graphics and immersion and one can't deny other consoles excel over the Wii in that respect. There is more to a game than those elements, though. Like gameplay. For myself - and I can't really say why - I just don't find anything compelling about the Wii's typical gameplay. I own one. I also own a PS3, XBOX 360 and about 20 other consoles. I wanted to love the Wii. I'd love to be drawn to it all the time. But I'm not.  After more than two years, I only have 15 games for the Wii and about 15 games for the PS3 and about 120 games for the XBOX 360. Between the PS3 and 360, I'd just as well be playing all the games on the PS3, bu some aren't available, some are better on the 360, and the multi-player is almost always preferable on the 360. But... that's mostly a pragmatic decision rather than any sort of "OMG I love the 360" loyalty.  When it come to playing time... it probably comes out to the same proportions. I haven't even touched the week in a full 18 months. Last time I touched it was when Boom Blox came out and I played it for about an hour before shutting if off.  I guess I'm not overwhelmed by Mario and Mario related games and I don't find anything terribly interesting about pretending to bowl or row a boat with a Wiimote. More importantly, the lack of voice chat online and the difficulty in arranging connecting to and playing with other people on the Wii keeps me from even bothering. I know a few people with one and I just don't care enough to bother setting up the online stuff. And even if we did, how would we communicate about what it was we wanted to do next?  I definitely have nothing against the Wii. I just wish it had more for me. For what it's worth, my little sister loves to play it when she visits (she's in her early 20s) but that's about it. If I'm not their market, that's okay. I'm not the market for those "Imaginez" titles on the DS, either. Not everything that is put out has to cater to my tastes. "

You bring up some interesting falsehoods in this post here. First of all, the Wii does in fact have voice chat. Sure, the online service for the most part isn't great, but for games like Smash Bros, it works just fine.  of course, you wouldn't know that since you mentioned you haven't bothered to set it up. 
 I can accept that the Wii may not have many games to appeal to you, but that remark about Mario games makes me think that it may be more ignorance on your part than anything else. I myself only own one Mario game, that being the much lauded Galaxy, and haven't even popped that one in yet. Like I just said to another Giantbomber, go take a look at the Wii side of these boards and you may find a few games that you want.   
As far as immersion goes, well, why don't you go play Muramasa and see if you still feel the same way.
 Oh and please, don't even get me started on the DS library.  "

"High Definition Elitists" would be more accurate. Fanboy implies allegiance to something that doesn't have a clear superior. Whereas HD resolutions are factually and mathematically superior than SD resolutions.

" "High Definition Elitists" would be more accurate. Fanboy implies allegiance to something that doesn't have a clear superior. Whereas HD resolutions are factually and mathematically superior than SD resolutions. "

Yes, the utter dismissal based on resolution alone is indeed silly, especially when all other games on the platform are the same way. But really, if one thinks somebody is a douche for commenting that a (probably the most) beautiful Wii game would really benefit from HD graphics, then I hear kettles are nozzled bags filled with soapy water.

 
1.I would call it inaccurate to say my comments are "falsehoods". Maybe it has changed now, but when the Wii was released, I am almost certain that it did not have voice chat and the only way you could find or interact with other players was via a convoluted "friend code"... and also an additional "game code". You had to be like a fucking World War II codebreaker to successfully set it up and play with the intended person (and if you succeeded on your side, you had to hope they figured it out on theirs as well). 

 
2.Ignorance of what? Mario? 
Look, as cute and fun as Mario Galaxy was, it wasn't all that compelling overall. I think I've had enough Mario franchise after twenty-five years. And as for Smash Bros... perhaps it was just the group I was playing with, but god damn it was just a bunch of memory-lane nostalgia mixed with button smashing. It was like everything was a giant roll of randomness. Then again, I didn't get very deep into it, so I may have missed something.
 
3.Like I said, I have nothing against the Wii. I think they are missing the mark in a lot of ways, but at least they have pushed the envelope and tried new things. Good for them. They just aren't persuading me to walk across the room and hit the power button in that little white monolith more than about once per year.
 
4.I keep my eye out for Wii games. I buy a lot of them (and then either don't play them or lose interest quickly in them). I've tried something from most of the genres on the Wii and come away thinking almost every time "I could have had this experience on the DS" or "so the only unique thing about this is that it's making me waggle a fucking plastic stick".
 
5.I would really love to see them do some hardcore RPG type stuff on it, though. Maybe even a crazy mix of old-school RPG (but better graphics and more depth to meet the Wii's capabilities) meets MMO of some kind. That might be charming and entertaining and get me into... because I know yet another Metroid remake or stacking some damn blocks or paddling a canoe or operating on a patient or doing yoga sure isn't (okay, I never did the yoga thing, but just saying'...).
 
6.I guess what it comes down to for me is that as innovative as the controls are, I just don't care that much. They feel like a gimmick far too often. And for what games are enjoyable, they may as well just be DS games. And for a lot of the platform's genres, it comes down to the often cited "well, this is cool... for a Wii game." But I have other consoles. It needs to be more than just a good game compared to the rest of the platform's library. It has to be really good, period.  I am just not seeing the huge "value add" where the Wii is concerned. There has to be something that compels me to play it. That compels me to think about it when I wake up or come home or need to relax. Something that says "you want to hit the power button and do something". And... there hasn't really been that, yet.   As for the DS... I may have missed your point there. Yes, there are a lot of great titles for the DS. Hell, I own a lot of them. But there are also a lot of terribly stupid ones like the cheerleading, wedding, fashion design, babysitting, and other ones. Like I said, those games aren't meant to cater to me just like a lot of the Wii games clearly aren't. And as I said above, everything doesn't have to cater to me. Or you for that matter. It still, however, comes down to the fact that they haven't managed to draw me into the Wii after a long time of ownership and many purchases. I'm open to it. I'm not ruling it out forever. But so far... fail.  They're clearly striking the chords of a lot of other people, though. So maybe they don't care about the demographic (whatever it is) that I fit into. Otherwise they'd have probably figured a way to capture it by now. In the meantime, the Wii is the thing that gets turned on when there are a lot of people visiting and everyone just wants to look goofy and compete at silly contests with each other. "

" @AgentJ: Well in an attempt to  make this thread less annoying to go through I'll just use reply on this one. Anyway, that's great that there's a way for smaller companies to get their games out there in the form of Wii games and portables. That doesn't make it better though. Don't get me wrong. When I get the spare cash, I'll eventually pick this up. Maybe some of comments could have been expressed better then "WII R TEH SUX KIDZ CONSOLE" but under all that shit, I can kinda see where some of them are coming from. "

" @MrGetBonus said:

" @AgentJ: Well in an attempt to  make this thread less annoying to go through I'll just use reply on this one. Anyway, that's great that there's a way for smaller companies to get their games out there in the form of Wii games and portables. That doesn't make it better though. Don't get me wrong. When I get the spare cash, I'll eventually pick this up. Maybe some of comments could have been expressed better then "WII R TEH SUX KIDZ CONSOLE" but under all that shit, I can kinda see where some of them are coming from. "

But as Linkyshinks pointed out, it's not worse off for being on the wii either. Like he said, the graphical upgrade would be negligible and the controls of the other consoles would put some people off. On the wii, people have more choice in how they play the game. I still think the idea of "Wii R teh sux" is ridiculous, but it seems we have hit an end point here.  "

" @AgentJ: Perhaps I should refine my comments:
 
Yes, I understand a lot has happened since I last turned my Wii on. However, my Wii doesn't have to be on to read reviews, watch trailers, playthroughs, demos, etc during that same time. The experience back then was so lackluster that nothing I've seen yet has compensated for the negative feelings I had about the machine enough that I want to rush back and flip the switch and start going at it with the Wii again.
 
You're right that there are a few good RPGs for the Wii, but considering this is Nintendo (and the DS has a nice library of them, even if some are just remakes) I'd hope for a lot more.
 
As for some of the titles you pointed out... Mad World just seemed like a giant gimmick, too. "Holy shit! We're Nintendo and this game is so violent!". Wow.
 And No More Heroes? It was certainly odd, but I'm not sure about great. The whole game seemed predicated on "this is some crazy shit! isn't this crazy?! Look how crazy this is! It's craaazy!".
 
I don't mean to be so dismissive of the console because a lot of the content for it is not awful. It just doesn't stand out for me and too much of what Nintendo does really does come across to me as "the next gimmick".

Overall, I think the best way to summarize my impression of the Wii after owning it for so long is that it is very shallow and broad. It has a little bit of everything, but not a lot. It seems like it's a console without a personality. That they throw a lot of things at it to see what sticks and then move on to the next thing. I'm not sure if that view is accurate, but it's how I see it. Is it a casual game machine? Is it for your grandmother to bowl with the knitting club? Is it for your mom to do fake yoga with? Is it for you to relive your early platformer and side-scroller nostalgia? Is it a whacky, zany, art-house game system? Is it just another venue for Kung-Fu Panda games? Is it a box you break out for party games when everyone is drunk? "

" There's nothing fanboyish about wanting to experience the highest quality picture in your videogames. Face it, the Wii is low quality. The only thing it has that's special about it is the gimmicky controller. Nintendo said that it would make you more immersed in the games, but I have found that it actually takes you out of the experience, and I'm sure most people here have found that as well. I backed Nintendo for about a year of having the Wii until I realized that it was a gimmick and that it was just a money grab. Instead of giving us good games, high quality graphics, high quality gameplay, a good online component, and good controls, they gave us "smiles."  I am not smiling Nintendo. I am not smiling one little bit.  This post probably has nothing to do with whatever argument is going on right now, but I just thought I would share my opinion about the subject. "

We've had a problem with graphic whores since the Super NES and Genesis.  It's not a recent porblem. 
If anything, I think this generation has helped that, with things like XBLA and downloadable games proving very popular despite their simplicity.

I can actually sympathise with the HD thing.  Since the Wii doesn't support it, it looks like crap on an HD TV.  You're forced between choosing something that's very blurry, or very jaggy.
If they had simply made the Wii support HD TV's, the games would have looked fine.  The graphics wouldn't have actually been any better, you'd just be able to get a clearler picture on HD TV's.
 
That was nothing but laziness and budget cutting on Nintendo's part, and their excuse was they wanted the Wii to be available to everyone..  All they did was alienate those with HD TVs.  

Some HDTVs have pretty good scalers so WIi (and SD content in general, including older systems, DVDs, etc) doesn't look bad on them. If yours doesn't, oh well, tough luck, but saying it looks like ass on HDTVs (implying all of them) is flat out false.
 
For the topic at hand, I'm with you Hailnel. Lol @ all the no gaemz talk that sprouted from this though. Still, it's GB, what do ya expect?

I think you're taking a lot of those comments out of context. Some are complaining that the game is just too damn expensive for what it is. 
 
Comparing it to Shadow Complex which, in my opinion, looks better(graphics/gameplay) and is only $15 fucking dollars!! $50 is asking a lot just looking from the video. Maybe it has more depth, I don't know from that video.
 
Also, of course people want an HD version if they own an HDTV. It looks better. Why would you not want to play something in the best resolution possible? It would be like buying a PC game that was constricted to 800x600 resolution. SD games don't look so pretty on HDTVs and that is why most re-releases of old games come with sprite filters and smoothing options.
 
The game looks really pretty from what I saw in the video, but those comments are completely understandable.

I don't find it surprising, at least with Muramasa's case. For me, the main reason to play that game is to experience the art. The gameplay doesn't look too interesting and deep (at least from the video), and I guess the story has the potential to become fascinating. Because of that, why would I not want it to be in the highest resolution possible.
 
It looks beautiful, so it would be nice to show it in as much detail as possible, especially since my core reason to buy it is the visuals. That said it's pretty silly to dismiss it just because it's on the wii, asumming you own the console. It just seems like a missed opportunity. If it's the only way to play it though, then i'll end up buying it at some point. Not at full price though I imagine.

I'm surprised so many people actually have HDTV's. They're ridiculously expensive. I like how console gamers arguments against PC gaming usually involve PC's being expensive, when you need to buy an HDTV for 500-1000 dollars (and that's a cheap one) plus a console for atleast 300 bucks.  
I sure can't afford one, so buying an HD console feels like a bit of a waste. My Wii on the other hand is happy on my big fat SDTV, and I love it for it.

" I'm surprised so many people actually have HDTV's. They're ridiculously expensive. I like how console gamers arguments against PC gaming usually involve PC's being expensive, when you need to buy an HDTV for 500-1000 dollars (and that's a cheap one) plus a console for atleast 300 bucks.   I sure can't afford one, so buying an HD console feels like a bit of a waste. My Wii on the other hand is happy on my big fat SDTV, and I love it for it. "

My monitor cost me like 20 bucks.

My monitor cost me like 20 bucks.

I can understand ppl not wanting to buy a Wii for this game since its not worth it for just this game.
Also according to several reviews the art seems to be the best part of the game so having it in HD is not a stupid thing to ask for.
Releasing a 2D game in this day and age you should expect comments like its should be a downloadable game because frankly there has been no 2D game this gen that is worth the full retail price. Even Shadow Complex that is in 3D but the gameplay is mainly on a 2D plane is not worth 60bucks even though I think its one of the best games this year.

Because the scanlines are due to the monitors and not the rest of the hardware? If you 're such a purist, get such a monitor.
 
As for the Wii being a repackaged gc, please, get informed ignoramus. The likes of you are exactly who caused this thread, with good reason. You make yourself look like a doofus just fine with such statements and immature insults (Pee? really?), you don't need a Wii for that.
 
Anyway, I guess this thread run its course, and the sensible people around here showed up with useful or insightful comments for the most part. Now it's time for the trolls to take over it seems, so, goodbye thread, it was pretty fun while it lasted, good job Hailinel :-P

The HD blockheads will have to find something else to complaint about when the Wii HD is released next year.

" @Hailinel:   The problem with the Wii is not the low-fi quality of its graphics and sound output.  The problem is that the Wii is a marketing scam.  I already own a GameCube.  Why would I want to buy a repackaged GameCube called Pee that makes me look like a doofus when I play it?   Had this game been released on the GameCube, I would have already owned it.  While we're on the subject of low-fi: why aren't there SCANLINE filters in rereleases of old arcade fighting games?   I'd rather play these on an emulator with a scanline filter--and I've been doing so since the late 90s. "

" Because the scanlines are due to the monitors and not the rest of the hardware? If you 're such a purist, get such a monitor. As for the Wii being a repackaged gc, please, get informed ignoramus. The likes of you are exactly who caused this thread, with good reason. You make yourself look like a doofus just fine with such statements and immature insults (Pee? really?), you don't need a Wii for that.  Anyway, I guess this thread run its course, and the sensible people around here showed up with useful or insightful comments for the most part. Now it's time for the trolls to take over it seems, so, goodbye thread, it was pretty fun while it lasted, good job Hailinel :-P "

" I have a 360 and a HD plasma television. I also have a Wii.  My 360 collection is about 25 games and the Wii 60.  I do not find anything about the 360 graphics that make me want to play it more.  In fact, I find some games simply horrible to look at - GTA IV.  Even if they do look pretty in HD, my eyes grow weary after my brain has been dulled by a bland game.  The only games I have found that look pretty and play well have Eternal Sonata and Infinite Undiscovery.  In short, I could care less about HD and in fact, because I like the Wii controller, I would much rather a game I like (Shin Megami) would be made exclusively as a Wii game most of the time.  The exception for my tastes are car racing games - a game like Forza is great on the 360.  Even if someone wishes a game would come to the console they own, you don't see the Wii owners whine every time a new games doesn't come to the their console.   That little emo habit is confined to the HD brigade.  Even if a game is a PS3 exclusive, and I don't own one, I just accept it and remember that I will get a PS3 later in the cycle,when it is much cheaper, and build up a good collection, cheap, from the older library (just as I did with the PS2).  HD people can just do the same.  A more gracious and mature comment from them would be, "eventually when I get around to owning a Wii, I will get that game". "

I have a tendency of saying stuff like "I would buy this game if it was on XBLA or PSN" but not because of HD.
 I don't even own a hd television. I own two SD though, one in fancy wood paneling to play my SNES or PS1 on.
 
and I do own all the three consoles and reason why I buy most of my games on the 360? I like the controller and XBlive.
And I don't care for the wii controller in most games. Stuff like house of the dead and Raving Rabbids is fun to play with it, but otherwise I prefer the 360 controller.
 
I do have a gamecube controller but It's not my favorite controller out there so if a game doesn't interest me enough I won't buy a game to play with it as long as it's not on a gamecube.

does muramasa not output in 480p?

if it does then i dont understand this thread.

i should also say i hate how everything thats 2d is instantly thought to be a downloadable game for no more than $15. muramasa im sure is hella longer and deeper than your typical fairly terrible xbla/psn release.

Man, I don't like this topic. Whenever I see rants defending the Wii the finger is always being pointed at "this generation" and it just makes me sad. I try to avoid it, really, but I can't help but place myself "above" the ranter who obviously wasn't around for garbage like the Sega CD or Atari Jaguar. And even if you weren't, that's fine, but at least show an understanding of the history. The only thing worse than people who are a little "over appreciative" of HD graphics are people who try to villify them as some brand new concept that's killing off the industry.
 
And why the cheap shot at Live Arcade/Playstation Network? It's the difference between a $50 game and a $15 game. Graphics are irrelvant there.
 
My personal opinion is that graphics are the least of the Wii's problem, but hey, I just thought I'd chime in. And yes, I do, in fact, have a Wii.

" I think you're taking a lot of those comments out of context. Some are complaining that the game is just too damn expensive for what it is. 
 
Comparing it to Shadow Complex which, in my opinion, looks better(graphics/gameplay) and is only $15 fucking dollars!! $50 is asking a lot just looking from the video. Maybe it has more depth, I don't know from that video.
 
Also, of course people want an HD version if they own an HDTV. It looks better. Why would you not want to play something in the best resolution possible? It would be like buying a PC game that was constricted to 800x600 resolution. SD games don't look so pretty on HDTVs and that is why most re-releases of old games come with sprite filters and smoothing options. The game looks really pretty from what I saw in the video, but those comments are completely understandable. "

"

does muramasa not output in 480p?

if it does then i dont understand this thread.

i should also say i hate how everything thats 2d is instantly thought to be a downloadable game for no more than $15. muramasa im sure is hella longer and deeper than your typical fairly terrible xbla/psn release.

"

" Mad World just seemed like a giant gimmick, too. "Holy shit! We're Nintendo and this game is so violent!". Wow. "

Those complaints you mentioned were so non-descrpit, that they could have to do with MY bigger issue with the wii, THE BLOODY CONTROLLER. First of all, developers fail to capitalize on a potentially interesting control method (although I am already done with motion control,) and second of all, the game doesn't even utilize the motion control. In that case, one has to admit that the controllers for the 360 and PS3 are simply more comfortable and easier to use, and at that point it DOES become difficult to understand why one wouldn't put it on one of the other consoles.

" Those complaints you mentioned were so non-descrpit, that they could have to do with MY bigger issue with the wii, THE BLOODY CONTROLLER. First of all, developers fail to capitalize on a potentially interesting control method (although I am already done with motion control,) and second of all, the game doesn't even utilize the motion control. In that case, one has to admit that the controllers for the 360 and PS3 are simply more comfortable and easier to use, and at that point it DOES become difficult to understand why one wouldn't put it on one of the other consoles. "

" If you still think that the Wii is just a repackaged GameCube at this point, there really is no point in debating with you.  Breaking through that ignorance would be akin to cutting diamonds. "

" @Branthog said:

" Mad World just seemed like a giant gimmick, too. "Holy shit! We're Nintendo and this game is so violent!". Wow. "

Except Nintendo wasn't involved with the development or publishing of that game at all. If you want to make such claims, make sure you know which parties were actually involved in the development (PlatinumGames) and publishing (Sega) of the game. That statement just makes it look like you don't know what you're talking about. "

" @Branthog: No different than stuff on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. The difference is that people don't see the system as "kiddy", so they don't have a problem with it when something like that comes out for those systems. "

I think the main problem here is that the Wii is such a different gaming console than the Xbox 360 and PS3.  Why would anyone make a game that appeals to people who have PS3s and 360s, and put it on a system with a completely different audience?  They are trying to make the Wii something its not, and that thing is a "hardcore" console.  The Wii is for casual players, who would never play a game like Infamous or Gears of War.  I think the developers should release this game in 360 and PS3 because it is just the logical thing to do.

" @LordAndrew said:

" @Branthog: No different than stuff on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. The difference is that people don't see the system as "kiddy", so they don't have a problem with it when something like that comes out for those systems. "

That may be true, but you can't blame consumers for that perception when that is exactly how Nintendo markets their system. As a kiddie/casual/parents' console. The fact that there is just so much ridiculous shovelware for it doesn't help, either. Indeed, other consoles have a lot of shovelware, too -- but I believe the ratio of it to high content on the Wii is much greater.  Maybe I personally am wanting the Wii to be something it really isn't going to be. I don't care about the waggle stick or graphics or zany Cuda stuff. I just want intriguing deep, long, awesome game experiences that I can't get elsewhere. The "it has to look like a movie" style of games on the other consoles makes games so expensive to produce that they're usually short and shallow. Since Nintendo can do away with that by reducing the impact of graphics int he first place, they are in the perfect spot to really push long, bang-for-the-buck, deep, addictive non pop-cap-style games that we're not seeing much of on these other consoles. "

" I think the main problem here is that the Wii is such a different gaming console than the Xbox 360 and PS3.  Why would anyone make a game that appeals to people who have PS3s and 360s, and put it on a system with a completely different audience?  They are trying to make the Wii something its not, and that thing is a "hardcore" console.  The Wii is for casual players, who would never play a game like Infamous or Gears of War.  I think the developers should release this game in 360 and PS3 because it is just the logical thing to do. "

" @oldschool said:

" I have a 360 and a HD plasma television. I also have a Wii.  My 360 collection is about 25 games and the Wii 60.  I do not find anything about the 360 graphics that make me want to play it more.  In fact, I find some games simply horrible to look at - GTA IV.  Even if they do look pretty in HD, my eyes grow weary after my brain has been dulled by a bland game.  The only games I have found that look pretty and play well have Eternal Sonata and Infinite Undiscovery.  In short, I could care less about HD and in fact, because I like the Wii controller, I would much rather a game I like (Shin Megami) would be made exclusively as a Wii game most of the time.  The exception for my tastes are car racing games - a game like Forza is great on the 360.  Even if someone wishes a game would come to the console they own, you don't see the Wii owners whine every time a new games doesn't come to the their console.   That little emo habit is confined to the HD brigade.  Even if a game is a PS3 exclusive, and I don't own one, I just accept it and remember that I will get a PS3 later in the cycle,when it is much cheaper, and build up a good collection, cheap, from the older library (just as I did with the PS2).  HD people can just do the same.  A more gracious and mature comment from them would be, "eventually when I get around to owning a Wii, I will get that game". "

wooo u have 60 wii games!!!! i can only think of about 10 good wii games out there(i do enjoy my wii wii) "

1. Super Mario Galaxy      
2.  Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, The 
3.  Super Smash Bros. Brawl 
4.  Resident Evil 4 Wii Edition  
5. Metroid Prime 3: Corruption  
6.  Zack & Wiki: Quest for Barbaros' Treasure 
7.  Little King's Story 
8.  Super Paper Mario 
9.  No More Heroes 
10.  WarioWare: Smooth Moves 
11.  Mario Kart Wii 
12.  de Blob 
13.  Rune Factory: Frontier 
14.  Wii Sports Resort 
15.  Trauma Center: Second Opinion 
16.  Wii Fit 
17.  Mario Strikers Charged 
18.  Wario Land: Shake It! 
19.  MySims Kingdom  
20. Final Fantasy Fables: Chocobo's Dungeon 
21. Trauma Center: New Blood 
22. Wii Sports 
23. Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles 
24. Battalion Wars 2 
25. Elebits 
26. Naruto: Clash of Ninja Revolution 
27. Animal Crossing: City Folk 
28. Excite Truck  
29.  Endless Ocean 
30.  Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World 
31.  MySims 
32.  Link's Crossbow Training 

" That may be true, but you can't blame consumers for that perception when that is exactly how Nintendo markets their system. "