Something went wrong. Try again later

HarbinLights

This user has not updated recently.

194 0 8 2
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

HarbinLights's forum posts

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@thechris said:

This is best thread, love it.

I'm not mentally ill. Nintendo brainwashed me.

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By HarbinLights

@zeik said:

@harbinlights: Having too many individual labels is not any better than having one overly broad label. Like I said, the vast majority do want clothes designed for their gender, so by categorizing them by gender you cut out a lot of needless clutter when searching through clothes. It's enough of a pain in the ass to find pants that I like and fit me as it is. Adding women's clothing into the mix sounds like hell.

Until society shifts to a point where the majority is willing to go either way with their clothing style there's no actual benefit for the average person by changing it.

Personally, I just wanna find ultra-wide JNCO style pants again. Shirts with stars and unicorns. And frilly pastel pink dresses. And Sylveon hats.

Sadly, most places don't sell any of those things in particular. And I usually have to go to online specialty stores and things. I mean maybe a few at Hot Topic and ect., but definitely not the thing you'd find an TJMaxx or something.

I'll wear a pair of men's pants with a My Little Pony belt, but then also wear it with a women's Pokemon shirt and wear an Eevee themed handbag. I wish I could say I have a pair of Princess Peach vans, but I didn't get them in time, and they're too expensive right now. :/

Anyway, I feel like these clothing sections force me to need to shop in both anyway. And that there's probably more overlap in men's and women's clothing by different aesthetic than just gender. I think these seperated sections by gender actually make it harder for me to find things than easier. If I were to find things easier, I would be better off if they had a section just called "cutesy and nerdy". As it is, I have to search through both binary gender categories, to find basically the exact same aesthetic and look.

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I like listening to fan-music and fanart. Does that count as interacting with fandom?

Anyway, the things I like are part of who I am. So yeah, I definitely feel a connection to people who like the same sorts of media and the same sorts of things about them as I do. Like the characters.

I just don't let the toxic parts of a fandom define me. And proudly like the things I like about a thing I like.

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@zeik said:

@harbinlights: Labels are not inherently evil. By nature they help us sort and categorize things so we can more easily find what we are looking for. Just labeling everything as "clothing" is too broad and does not actually benefit the average consumer, who by and large do want clothing designed for their respective gender. (Or even specifically because it represents the other gender.)

I'm all for breaking down stereotypes and prejudices of what certain genders are allowed to wear within society, but removing those gender categories entirely does not actually benefit society as a whole, and simply removing those labels while ignoring the root cause of why those labels exist would only cause more problems than they would solve.

I think there are so much more interesting and accurate labels for the fashion, design, aesthetics, size, shape, ect. of clothing, than gender ones.

I'm all for clothing having labels, more than we have now currently, even. Just not gender ones.

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Like, an anthropomorphic Mushroom? Is that what Toads are?

It is confirmed now that it is not a hat, the 'cap' is part of their heads. Kind of like how nokonoko/koopa troopas are basically turtle people reminiscent of kappas. And Goombas are.. chestnuts?

Would I get something akin to toxoplasmosis were I around Toads for an extended period of time?

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I have this weird desire to go through pipes, now, after years of playing Mario games. I know I surely can't be alone in this.

I don't suppose there is a way to incorporate, large, oversized pipe-shaped structures into my home and yard design? Like, I don't suppose someone has a pot/planter shaped as a warp pipe? Especially considering Mario Pipes often contain Piranha Plants.

I suppose you can use one of those fangamer pipe mugs for that purpose.

https://www.fangamer.com/products/pipe-mug

I want something bigger, though.

Ideally but impractically, though, I kinda want a door in the shape of a warp pipe, somewhere, somehow. :/ Has anyone out there in the world figure out a way to make a door out of a warp pipe? That would just be way too cool as an entrance to a game room or something.

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ares42 said:

@harbinlights: But who says it's bad for men to portray themselves as men and women to portray themselves as women ? Taking away the option to dress like a man or a woman isn't exactly opening room for expression and individuality either. There are plenty of clothes that are fairly gender neutral if that's what you're looking for, but most people like to dress according to their gender identity.

I'm not interested in taking away the clothes. I'm interested in taking away the labels. All the clothes that exist for men and women today and more should exist. I don't think they need gender labels.

I don't think that, for instance, dresses should be considered "women's clothing". They should just be considered human clothing.

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't need one of these.

But I need one of these.

Avatar image for harbinlights
HarbinLights

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ares42 said:

@harbinlights: Clothes are an expression of who you are. As far as making first impressions there's almost nothing that comes close to being as important as your clothes. Sure a shirt is a shirt and a jacket is a jacket, but what clothes you choose to wear says a lot about your identity, and gender identity is a part of that.

Yeah, but by gendering clothing and other products, companies are kinda pushing gender roles moreso than self expression and individuality.