Something went wrong. Try again later

kcin

This user has not updated recently.

1140 9 11 4
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

kcin's forum posts

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By kcin

@regularassmilk said:
@onemanarmyy said:

If Jeff is excited i'm excited.

It would be unprofessional for him to say anything else at this point. The cheerleader in here only weirds me out more. I'd always assumed Jeff did well enough in the sale to CBS that he could walk away at any time, if he wanted to, and now he's older and has a family I think the possibility only becomes more real if this PE/Marketing firm or whatever is just as clumsy as...oh, I don't know--any of the PE and VC groups that have taken working websites and drowned them in the toilet in the last decade.

What I'm worried about is that if Giant Bomb evaporates, I don't think we're going to see renegade Jeff back in a sausalito basement, I think he'll be like...someone who occasionally streams old games and writes something once a year on medium. and that makes me sad!

This post speculating about the secret motivations of Jeff and the personal details of his life is easily weirder by one thousand times than the guy talking about his personal experience working at Red Ventures.

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@shindig said:

I might need more context for that. Were they taking name suggestions from the chat?

How would using those names because the chat suggested them be any better than coming up with them themselves?? what??

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By kcin

@bladeofcreation said:

@north6: Are you suggesting that the Democrats have a hand in perpetuating the forever war?

golly, but if the DEMOCRATS are SUPPORTING the war...what do I do with my completely imaginary worldview/his strawman???

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mars said:

This is a mostly shameful thread. Disappointing.

there's always one of these guys here. just popping in to a thread about a serious cultural dilemma to say some purposefully unspecified aspect of the thread is beneath them. thanks for the input dude

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@kcin: We are talking about peoples lives not used cars.

I have no idea what part of my post made you think I am sympathetic to the military.

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bocckob said:

Huh. I guess they've got a war planned in the next few years.

Recruitment offices and on-site recruitment efforts have been effectively halted by the pandemic, so they've made a conscious effort to redirect it virtually. Compound the effects of the pandemic with depressed recruitment numbers (they actually missed their 2018 and 2019 goals, and most who sign up now are just children of previous recruits), and the desperation felt through these games-oriented efforts starts making more sense. People don't want to join the military of their own volition anymore, and they can't hold space in which to convince stray kids to do it.

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By kcin

@subscryber: Yeah, you did man. You said that the chart above "just means there's a statistical racial disproportion AMONG THOSE WHO COMMIT CRIME." You go on to say, "But if they are statistically over-represented in violent crime, that could potentially mean that they are also statistically more likely to bear the greater share of police violence."

So, first, yes, you did say that death at the hands of police is presumably the result of committing crimes. Second, that's quite tonedeaf, considering the months-long international protests over the killing of a black man who did not commit a violent crime, and the killing of a black woman who was asleep in her own bed, whose home was raided with a no-knock warrant in the middle of the night, and which was not the residence of the suspect. It's not just tonedeaf, it's ignorant. Like, you literally don't know what you're talking about. And yet, somehow, you're mad about it! Audacious!

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@subscryber: Oh man...getting shot by cops quite often has nothing to do with actually committing a crime at all. Maybe you're racist, maybe not, but you sure are wrong about the supposition that every police interaction starts with an actual crime being committed.

Avatar image for kcin
kcin

1140

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By kcin

@thej6m said:

@onemanarmyy:

Should I address everyone as sir/madam then? I’m not being snarky I can totally do that I just want to demonstrate a certain degree of politeness. This is an important conversation and I believe it deserves a particular level of reverence.

See this is the problem with people who employ this demeanor. You think reverence and civility are going to deflate the tension around questioning whether or not black people getting killed by cops at a disproportionately high rate is ultimately validated by their own behavior.

Additionally, predicating that question on the assumed fact that black communities are systematically impoverished and that (you infer) this increases crimes committed by black people isn't as arguably sympathetic as you think it is. It omits myriad external forces, namely the actions of the police forces themselves, from culpability and still leaves "crimes" at the feet of the black people being pulled over, searched, charged, or- worse - killed by police.

But quite honestly, I have no interest in going over this fuckin data again with anyone, especially someone who tips their hat and calls me 'sir' as they question the validity of police killing black people. It's more sinister than honesty. But don't worry, we can between the lines. Bye.