@larrydavis said:
@ozzdog12 said:
@terminatorz: The perfect Batman game was Arkham Asylum and no one will ever convince me otherwise.
Yup. And of the two released open-world games, Origins is actually better. Tighter plotting, better writing, better character designs. Too bad that it was viewed as a simple retread and Rocksteady go out of their way to shit all over it.
Edit: ayyy, looks like @mustainium is with me on this. High five!
I would probably be in complete agreement with you about Origins if there weren't multiple progress-impeding bugs and if the combat had been just a little tighter. At high level play, there were some significant issues with Batman's targeting, evading, and countering--just some light jank and inconsistency--that hadn't been present to the same degree in Asylum or City.
I never encountered any bugs, to be honest, and I do think them announcing they weren't going to fix some of it was pretty bad. But at the same time, there are certain things about game development that the general public finds hard to fathom, and it definitely is possible that it just wasn't worth it for them to spend time and money fixing something that a small minority of players had seen. I know they fixed that vent thing, which was apparently present for everyone, so at least there's that.
I didn't notice a whole lot of jank, but Batman's combat has never been particularly challenging to begin with. After getting 1000/1000 in Asylum, I never bothered with many of the challenge stuff, largely because they introduced that "campaign" thing that would make you replay maps over and over.
At the very least, Origins didn't have every single NPC talking about how Catwoman and Harley Quinn are "bitches" that they want to fuck.
Log in to comment