@liquidprince: "Recorded history" isn't all there is, it is just what was dominant at the time. Not to mention that there are hundreds, if not thousands of different cultures right now. And some of them happen to be matriarchal. Another link.
Not every culture finds the same features attractive, and even in western culture, most of the people are not even close to the exaggerated ideal of beauty that we see in media.
No offense, but that is sort of an asinine comment. Recorded history may not be the whole truth, and in fact it may be a complete lie, but it is the only thing we have to go on. You cannot make assumptions of what cultures outside of recorded history deemed attractive. Either way, that is irrelevant because at a biological level (not accounting for the minority or abnormality) women in the cultures that we do in fact have a record on have always been deemed as the fairer sex. Meaning they were the gender of beauty, of frailty, and of motherly love. If you want to argue that that is not an accurate representation of all women and that there should be more variety, then we may have something to discuss, but again, not accounting for modern issues of gender identity, men are men and women are women. We are different creatures and the way we are presented in media will always be different.

Log in to comment