MikeJFlick

Yeah, Jeff said as much, but besides that without Ryan and Without the dozen or so others from Wiskey Media it would feel rather bare.

I tend to beat up phones, because I use them constantly, I have them jangling in my pockets with my car keys and other such things, the last thing I want to do after having a phone that looks like someone has just used a piece of sand paper on the screen is to play a video game on.

So that makes me a handheld fan.

I've been a fan of DCS developers since Flanker and they managed to map most of the black sea and a huge chunk of the caucasus(Flight Sim 2000 did better, but that world looked like ass =)), yet even that isn't enough for me, I want more, and I will never stop wanting more, but I think the industry at the moment(last 10 years...) seems far more interested in turning out better and better graphics then spending that GPU and CPU power to create vaster open worlds.

The way I would of handled GTAV is the same way I would handle watchdogs, you allow them(the players) to drive off into factious highways or turnpikes, that lead to nothing and repeat as you are continuously and seamlessly transported a half way point in the same road, and make the wilderness outside of this road impassible as for other methods of travel you do the same thing, make a wall that seems like you are still moving when infact you aren't, as if you are flying into a invisible sheet of plastic that just keeps you in-position while giving-way for your movements.

This allows the player a more or less a better reality then creating an island or visible "hard" walls.

Why does it seem like every company in the world wants us to sit in front of a television on a sofa instead of in front of a desk on a chair?

Help it out, silly.

How? the Xbone will still be on the shelf since I have no intention on getting it, NICE TRY MICROSOFT. =)

@video_game_king:

"These are positions of power. They're demonstrative of power."

Yet you failed to quote where I said men are also always portrayed as racist and sexist, which I'll now add idiotic, simple, manipulative and dishonest, do these too suggest power?

"Because women who buy games are in the very small minority at....45%. And they're actually in the majority if we're talking about the United States population in general."

Yes of "causal" games, not of "hardcore" games, for example 50% of all movie fans are women, guess how many women watch and buy action movies compared to how many women watch and buy romantic comedies?

I've never liked paypal, I suspect like any other "bank" they want to hold on to as much money as possible from people so that they can gamble with it themselves.

Video games are sexist towards men, as men are generally the bad guys, the killers, insensitive, racist, sexist and a number of other things, who the hell cares though? Games are made to sell, and they are marketed towards their intended market and not the minority, why doesn't farmville cater to my needs? Why? Because it's not targeting me.

Crack should stick to the jokes and pop-top lists, not this feminists BS.