" @oldschool said:You know what is genuinely funny about your post - I never criticised Brad's review. I never commented about it. I have no opinion on it. I am not interested in the game. Funny how you seem all worked up about it though. Though, I am loving the contradiction and you confirm my point with this silly vitriol - we can pass judgement on reviewers, bit we have to be select about who it is and consult the cool kids first. You can't eat your cake and have it too.that's just a dumb thing to say. Are you talking about lost planet 2 (or monster hunter tri, its the same argument)? Brad did not give that game a low score because it was too hard. What happened was that people who have an irrational love for that game dramatically oversimplified Brad's review to create an easily-mocked strawman argument. This stuff is basic logic and argumentation 101. You're not fooling anyone, give it up already. You are not way smarter than the people who disagree with you, as you may think. "
" @psyborg0815 said:"So the game basically sucks, because it's too hard for him?"Funny, I remember a certain GB writer criticised for the same thing, and all hell broke loose. So I am assuming there is a list of reviewers we can criticise and those we can't, so I know what is going on? "