Something went wrong. Try again later
Giant Bomb is under new ownership. Log in now to accept new terms and conditions and transfer your account to the new owner!

OrangePylon

This user has not updated recently.

13 0 15 1
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Why I think it's hard for GB to diversify the staff.

It looks like Giant Bomb's new hires are turning into a bit of an issue, and not because of their unspellable last names.

So Dan and Jason are white dudes. Lots of folks were hoping that the new hire would be a woman or a member of a minority group. Patrick Klepek's interest in the polarizing "feminism and minority representation in gaming" debate has, in turn, cultivated a crowd of duders and duderettes who want to see more diversity in the Giant Bomb cast of characters. With all of the gaming diversity debate shitstorms on GB, it might seem hypocritical that they ended up hiring two white dudes anyway. Since this is a personality-driven website, it's natural for people to want someone they can identify with for the sake of discussions and reviews/quick looks, so I fully understand the desire to see a female or minority staff member. However, I also think this view is misguided and shows a lack of understanding of the range of abilities a person needs to have in order to do what Giant Bomb does.

Giant Bomb needed to hire people who are well-established, experienced, and skilled in this weird on-camera video game personality field. They needed people who can produce high-quality content without a long gestation period to learn the craft. Otherwise you're just asking for shitty, boring, awkward, meandering content. There are very very few people in the world who have that kind of experience, who have proven themselves capable of producing great off-the-cuff content and discussion about video game bullshit. Out of that already narrow pool, how many are women or minority? It's probably not a lot. That's a sad fact of this subculture, it happened to start with nerdy white dudes, then stereotyped as something that only white guys did for so long that the scene has become extremely protective of its demographic. In this kind of environment, it makes sense that the most able candidates for something like a Giant Bomb staffer would end up being white dudes. It's incredibly unfortunate, but that's the world we live in.

You could argue that maybe they could hire a less experienced or skilled candidate for the sake of an alternate perspective, and maybe grow their skills from there. I don't think Giant Bomb can afford to do that with its paid full-time employees. The value of this site's content rests in how well you know these people and their quirks, so the site needs to stay somewhat "small" in order to retain the audience familiarity. Because the staff needs to remain small, yet still consistently produce interesting and popular content, every single member of the staff needs to be at the top of their game. It's not the kind of place that can act as a proving ground for the inexperienced, unless CBSi wants to bring in some interns (which would be great!), but every paid full-time employee of this ramshackle operation needs to be pretty damn good, because every weakness will chase off subscribers and further polarize the community. Youtube and Twitch are the proving grounds, the place for the inexperienced to hone their skills and hopefully make connections. Giant Bomb just can't afford to take on an inexperienced unskilled candidate no matter how interesting their background might be, because an alternate viewpoint is worthless if the person isn't able to articulate it well on camera/microphone, or slows down the workflow behind the scenes.

Furthermore, I don't think you need someone with a particular skin color or sex organs in order to discuss and point out issues of gender or racial stereotyping or discrimination. I think you're gravely underestimating the intelligence and awareness of the GB staff if you think they're part of the gender or racial inequality problem in gaming culture. They're not just "white guys", they're also adult humans with fully-functional brains, and they work very hard to make this website and its content inclusive, so it can be enjoyed by everybody. For example, I think the way they react to stereotypical depictions of women in video games is the right way for this website: they mock it, they treat it with sarcasm and ridiculousness, with maybe brief discussion about what's wrong. They usually do not get too serious or overly "political" (for lack of a better word), because that is not the tone that brings people to Giant Bomb. Patrick catches a lot of shit for mentioning and discussing the issues, but that's mainly because the issues themselves are controversial, he doesn't actually focus on that stuff much more than the other serious topics he discusses. Anyway, the staff's race and gender aren't preventing them from keeping this site inclusive (Jeff's rap lyrics notwithstanding).

On a side note, I bet someone's gonna make the argument that a female or minority staff member would make the rest of the staff far too guarded and careful on anything involving gender or race, and the content would become more awkward and stilted as a result. That kind of thing only really happens with people you don't know very well, GB is close-knit by nature so I don't think that kind of guardedness would happen. You can cross certain barriers around friends that you wouldn't cross around acquaintances.

My point is, Giant Bomb can't just "hire a woman" or "hire a black guy" or "hire a genderless purple thought entity". Above all else, they need people with mastery of a certain rare combination of abilities, which gives them such a narrow pool to draw from that requiring a particular combo of genes would just not work. GB is still expanding, maybe in the future they can find someone who comes from a more interesting background and possesses the skills they need to grow the site into something even dumber.

I'm speculating a lot here, though. What do you folks think?

191 Comments

206 Comments

Avatar image for adequatelyprepared
AdequatelyPrepared

2522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Wait, people are actually are pissed about the new hires on basis outside of personality? Yelling at the GB crew isn't really going to accomplish much, but people are free to take their page views and subscriptions elsewhere. That's the beauty of free will.

Avatar image for spaceinsomniac
SpaceInsomniac

6353

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By SpaceInsomniac

@spaceinsomniac: I'm not sure if you're genuinely comparing the discussion of diversity to opposition to vaccinations, but I won't deny the reality that bullying people talking about diversity only draws greater focus on the necessity of talking about it.

No, what I'm saying is what I've said:

There are several good arguments that can be made to support diversity. "People don't like what we're saying, so that PROVES we're right!" is not one of them. It's an argument that can presented by any activist, no matter how worthy or batshit crazy their cause, which ultimately makes it worthless.

That many in this community have a problem with taunting and mocking the very idea of bringing up diversity is indicative of its importance here.

No, it's not. Just as taunting and mocking the very idea of men's rights isn't indicative of it's importance here. "My opinion makes people angry, so that proves I'm right" is just a really crappy way to think. I've seen it from men's rights, I've seen it from feminists, I've seen it from republicans, I've seen it from democrats, liberals, conservatives, atheists and Christians alike. It's worthless.

At best, it makes you feel better by pointing your finger at the absolute worst examples of opposing thought, and at worst it promotes the same "us vs them" mentality that prevents any actual discussion. If someone is taunting and mocking your opinions, then ignore them and engage someone else. Don't conflate them with everyone who simply disagrees with you, and use them to declare "see, this means there really is a problem, and that means I'm right!"

Avatar image for sweep
sweep

10889

Forum Posts

3660

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

sweep  Moderator

I don't think they should hire to meet a quota or to diversify for the sake of diversifying, but I think it's kind of weird that mods are buckling down so hard on the announcement thread. I don't understand what the issue is if people are discussing it respectfully?

People aren't discussing it respectfully. If people are going to hijack a thread which is supposed to be welcoming two new members of staff with "I'm disappointed these people were hired" then that's inconsiderate and rude. We're open to discussions regarding diversity taking place, which is why users are being redirected to threads like this one, instead of in a thread welcoming Dan and Jason (who are completely blameless in this whole situation).

Avatar image for cecil
Cecil

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

VIDEO GAMES!!!!!!!!!!

Avatar image for backseatboss
BackseatBoss

366

Forum Posts

975

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Yeah, fuck it, I hoped that GB would only hire black/asian/latino guys and girls, don't care if they were more qualified or not! I mean seriously, this is the white guy guilt coming out with all that race stuff. If the GB staff have known both of the hires for a long time, got along with them, that's the reason why they were hired. This stuff about getting females and minorities on staff is just complete bullshit. If they were better qualified than the two new hires, they would be hired instead.

Avatar image for veektarius
veektarius

6420

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

You may want to wait a week, or, I don't know, a month or more before you judge the results of the new hires. Speculation about how it might go wrong is pointless; now that the decision is made the results will come in time regardless.

Avatar image for sergio
sergio

3663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

I do agree though that since they are such a small crew they cant really experiment with diverse new hires ala kotaku/polygon.

Polygon isn't that diverse. The majority are still white men. Dan was hired as a senior editor at Giant Bomb. How many senior editors at Polygon aren't white men? Zero. Kotaku at least has one woman on their editorial staff. Even then, Jason Schreier tends to keep me away from that site.

Avatar image for metalhammer
metalhammer

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@excast said:

Honest talk here. Some of the most outspoken critics on Twitter have been folks like Samantha Allen, Eilizabeth Simins, and applicant Maddy Myers.

I wasn't familiar with anyone you mentioned but have just looked at their Twitter profiles - I really wish I hadn't. What is written there just seems like some seriously spiteful bile, almost as if applications were made as an enabler for outrage.

Ridiculous.

Avatar image for ett
Ett

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Ett

I have been saying it even before there was talk about hiring new people. I would love to see more diversity. Especial with all the talk Patrick did at the time. I dont know Jason and Dan. Does GB need more wrestling? Fuck no if you ask me .But when hearing Jason is a fighting game player , that made me happy. Why because we share a thing together and i can connect with Jason on a level none FG player cant.

Thats what people were hoping for to get out of the new hires. Be it being from a minority or being a woman or 3rd gender or even of younger generation.

Lets hope the next hires (I get the feeling how Jeff been talking this may be the plan) bring something fresh and new.

Avatar image for corevi
Corevi

6796

Forum Posts

391

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

This again. They're seemingly good people, at least the little I've heard. What gives? Start your own video game website. With blackjack and hookers.

Fixed that for ya.

Avatar image for emfromthesea
emfromthesea

2161

Forum Posts

70

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

I was never terribly interested in who might be hired for Giant Bomb, because I feel very invested in the original team. I come to Giant Bomb for personalities, and I am satisfied with the ones I already get. So I find myself apathetic to the uproar of people demanding non-white males as hires. Sure, diversity is great, but I don't think every site needs to be a beacon of diversity. The internet is a big place, and I can go to other sites when I feel I want a radically different perspective. I was happy with how Giant Bomb was before, and I hope the new hires don't change that too drastically. So best of luck to Dan and Jason.

On a side note, I would never want to see these people that feel the need to shout abuse on twitter being affiliated with Giant Bomb.

Avatar image for boboblaw
boboblaw

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By boboblaw

@metalhammer: yeah those ladies just seem pissed that they weren't hired and have gone slightly overboard on the issue.

About reguarding the topic of this thread though, its a valid criticism that GBsf is all white duders and they could do with some diversity, but as many have pointed out they were a staff of only 3 people. Hardly as though its a site of GameSpot's size that are all white dudes. Also considering how bare bones they were they had to go for "safe/smart" hires.

Also Dan is just fucking perfect for the job, so fuck everyone.

P.s. don't forget Robyn is half a member of giant beast!

Avatar image for deactivated-5a0917a2494ce
deactivated-5a0917a2494ce

1349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

@ares42 said:

@cyberfunk: I honestly don't get why people are expecting GB to suddenly be some site full of diverse viewpoints. It has always been quite narrow, that's pretty much what the basis for the site is. The whole idea behind the site was that by getting to know the people behind the reviews you would get a better understanding of how the review relates to your own tastes. If the site was filled with people with wildly different opinions the process of getting to know these people (through the way they cover games) would just be a bunch of arguing and fighting. While that's fun once in a while it would become increasingly tedious to listen to if it became the majority of the content.

The great part of GB has always been that it's a group of people that enjoy similar games and share that enjoyment with each other. It keeps the mood light while also being informative. If you pay attention you will notice that they've very deliberately always put the people most interested in a game to cover it. The site would completely crumble if every QL was two people arguing about wether a game is good or bad. Their angle has never been to show as many opinions as possible about games, it's quite opposite, trying to be as singular in their perspective as possible.

Because a minority of people on the internet love diversity for the sake of diversity. It's why Patrick is becoming more and more of a great fit for Polygon, not Giantbomb. Giantbomb is about personalities and their interaction which is why Jason and Dan are great choices. Hiring a woman or a minority with little experience just for the sake of diversity is ridiculous. If they don't mesh well with the others, everything starts falling apart. We should all trust that Giantbomb hires who they think best fits the site no matter the individuals race or gender, I do. All of these people getting ridiculous about the straight white male thing are the ones that are starting to sound bigoted. Just because in left-wing corners it's socially acceptable to rail against the straight-white man, doesn't mean it's right.

Avatar image for tdous
tdous

270

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

These already skilled, talented people, who apparently (I don't know them at all) will fit in quickly and well, became available when GB was hiring. Whatever checklists and quotas you may want the hiring process, it would have been madness not to take the opportunity, versus untested recruits for the sake of an oversimplified, internet forum definition of "diversity". Why not just view this as shoring up the ship? Even if you're concerned about similarities to current team members, an actually believe they won't have their own things to offer, it just means GB can produce more of the content it has been, with familiar personalities giving the space Jeff's wanted to do more "crazy stuff", whatever that might be.

Also is the hiring process ever really over? Now these obvious and successfully opportunistic hires are done, maybe they can look for people with more of a varied set of backgrounds and viewpoints, if they feel the need. For me, it's about games and making me laugh and as long as one or the other, or often both of those things are taken care of it doesn't bother me at all.

I wish them both the best of luck and look forward to seeing where the site goes.

Avatar image for mortal_sb
mortal_sb

675

Forum Posts

1947

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By mortal_sb

oh you fucking guys are crazy. they hired the best HUMANS they thought were best for the job. i do the same. i don't care about peoples race, color, gender or sexual preferences when hiring. their political agenda is something different, but the thing is that they have to fit well and that they have their heart at the right place. saying that all "white guys" are the same is bat shit crazy.

Avatar image for adequatelyprepared
AdequatelyPrepared

2522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@excast:

I just read some of Maddy's tweets. Jesus, just the amount of anger and bitterness. I sense that UPFs with her would get very uncomfortable very quickly.

Avatar image for sergio
sergio

3663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

@excast said:

Honest talk here. Some of the most outspoken critics on Twitter have been folks like Samantha Allen, Eilizabeth Simins, and applicant Maddy Myers.

I wasn't familiar with anyone you mentioned but have just looked at their Twitter profiles - I really wish I hadn't. What is written there just seems like some seriously spiteful bile, almost as if applications were made as an enabler for outrage.

Ridiculous.

I had already written off Samantha Allen as being someone to take seriously after Patrick had linked a couple of her opinion pieces in Worth Reading. Last night someone asked the legitimate question, what if Dan and Jason were hired because they were best qualified people. Her response was for him to fuck off, and her contingent of followers, including other female journalists, cheered on that response.

Jason was hired to help Drew now that Vinny is on GBNY, and I doubt as many qualified women applied for that position than for the senior editor position Dan got. I'm sure plenty of qualified women and people of different races applied for that job, but maybe, just maybe, Dan was the best qualified to work at GBSF.

Avatar image for joshwent
joshwent

2897

Forum Posts

2987

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

@amyggen said:

I'll say my 2 cents on this issue. I think GB needed someone who would fit right in because of how short staffed the SF office is right now, and both Dan and Jason seem to fit the bill. You would need to have a ton of video experience for Jeff to be certain that you would hit the ground running like they need, and that narrows the pool of talent by a lot.

This is the crucial point that I wish more would consider after their gut reactions. The position that Dan is filling of 'Editor' really means, 'Someone with a wealth of not only games coverage experience but video experience who can be instantly comfortable in front of a camera and isn't afraid to do dumb shit and can be spontaneously and reliably funny.'

Not many straight white dudes, let alone any other people fit that bill.

When they hired Patrick, it again was a very specific thing, 'Someone with a wealth of experience and connections covering industry news'. They wanted a news person, not a video person, and even Patrick (he himself admits) is still getting the hang of effective video content.

Avatar image for metalhammer
metalhammer

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sergio: The sadness for me in their reactions comes from the fact that it doesn't exactly endorse them for future endeavours. And it rubs me up the wrong way so I now have no inclination to check on the content that they create, which is also sad.

Avatar image for extomar
EXTomar

5047

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By EXTomar

Did I miss the uprising and uproar about this? Who, besides the thread starter, are the people concerned about this? I thought people were glad they were filling up the San Fransisco office again.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a0917a2494ce
deactivated-5a0917a2494ce

1349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

@sergio: I've read a lot of Samantha Allen's stuff, and she isn't just feminist, she's so feminist that it seems like she actually hates men which is a massive issue. Polygon has gone so far off the rails that I actually think they are hurting the diversity train, not helping it.

Avatar image for clonedzero
Clonedzero

4206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's a personality driven site. They hired for their personalities. Period. This is so damn crazy and kinda insulting to the new guys just because they happen to be "white males". People are upset because they are white men. Isn't that just an "acceptable" form of racism? Disliking them simply because of their race and gender?

This shit is ridiculous. Also, if one of them was black or asian or something what new perspective would they bring? It's video games.

Fact is, people were going to bitch about the new hires no matter what, it's just kinda disgusting people are bitching about their god damn race. Hypocrites.

Avatar image for jasonr86
JasonR86

10468

Forum Posts

449

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Hiring someone by type just so the company can say 'he we hire this type of person' and the audience can pay themselves on the back because they now go to a site with a staff member who is a type of person. Doesn't all of that sort of imply 'we hired you, and our audience is happy with you, because of what you are' rather than 'who you are'? Isn't that in direct opposition to equality?

Avatar image for excast
excast

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@excast:

I just read some of Maddy's tweets. Jesus, just the amount of anger and bitterness. I sense that UPFs with her would get very uncomfortable very quickly.

I'm sure her and Jeff doing an hour long Quick Look of Madden 15 would have been great though.

It's like, I can understand women who are into video games wanting to have a larger voice in the industry. I really do. I would have been find if Giant Bomb hired someone of any race or gender or disability as long as they fit in and were able to help the site continuing producing the kind of quality content we all love. But when you see some of these applicants who are so very angry about everything and seem to hate that a site like Giantbomb exists, why should I be surprised they weren't hired? Should I be outraged that Maddy Myers wasn't chosen instead of Dan Ryckert? Why? Do her comments over the last week or so leave me with the impression she would have been a positive addition to the site? Not so much.

Avatar image for j12088
J12088

471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By J12088

I'd really like to see an australian on here. I don't think australians are represented enough. I'd also love for them to higher someone over hte age of 60 because theres lots of games for old people and nobody is talking about it. So crazy.

Not only that we have to seriously consider the largest population on earth; China. WHY are there no chinese speaking game reporters? Theres over a billion of them giantbomb i mean HELLO?? Just higher one so we can get his point of view. I don't care what typical white guys say. There a dime a dozen i want a chinese one. Hopefully female chinese. Female, chinese and in a wheelchair would be perfect. Can we all please just stop being racist i thought this site was different.

Avatar image for excast
excast

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@extomar said:

Did I miss the uprising and uproar about this? Who, besides the thread starter, are the people concerned about this? I thought people were glad they were filling up the San Fransisco office again.

A number of women involved in "games journalism" in some manner have gone out of their way to be rather critical of Giant Bomb both for their E3 panels and for the recent hiring process.

Avatar image for alexw00d
AlexW00d

7604

Forum Posts

3686

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

The fact that people would be saddened by them hiring 2 white fellows because they're white is no different to being saddened by then hiring women because women.

If you want equality then you want equality, not equality for a specific subsection of people (Ie not equality at all).

Avatar image for shinjin977
shinjin977

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I think we should not even argue if they should hire this or that but how many people even want to enter into this type of field/positions. Look at what Patrick went through and even now he is still the subject of ignorant/unjustified hatred. That is not an attractive job offer for many. Dan is a pretty accepted duder in the community already so he is a pretty safe hire imo and Jason........well.....lets just hope the community have grown up since Patrick.

Avatar image for amyggen
AMyggen

7738

Forum Posts

7669

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@joshwent: Being natural on camera is fucking difficult and a talent not all have. Watch earlier Gamespot videos of Ryan and especially Brad. Patrick has said multiple times that he struggled in the first months on camera since he didn't have much experience.

They were never gonna hire someone without a lot of talent in front of the camera as an editor, and yeah, that narrows it down by a lot. You might say that that skews it towards males because mostly men have that experience, but that's just how it is.

Avatar image for andmm
andmm

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By andmm

People need to get a life and stop being offended/complaining about everything and everyone all the time on the internet. Same old same old.

The number of facepalms seeing some comments here/twitter is really high right now.

Avatar image for masterrain
masterrain

386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By masterrain

Where are the British candidates huh? This is some Anglophobic shit! We are sorry about the stamp act of 1765, but you never apologised for the tea you wasted at the Boston tea party! Danny will never get hired in this environment.

The crew hired people they knew, who they got along with, and who were qualified. Its not like they hired their unqualified friends just to get them jobs. Calling everything racism and sexism makes people become desensitised, and actually harms the movement.

WELCOME TO GIANTBOMB! I promise its not usually this serious ;D

Avatar image for cbk486
cbk486

229

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Throughout all of this, I still don't understand why people use twitter so much. It just seems like a tool to express unproductive rage or shoot yourself in the foot.

Avatar image for zevvion
Zevvion

5965

Forum Posts

1240

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

Edited By Zevvion

I hate this topic, yet I can never stop myself from replying.

It doesn't matter what race, color, gender, sexual orientation or whatever else the person applying for the job has. They should hire the best person qualified for the job and that they feel fits in their current group. If that happens to be a brown bicurious man, they should hire him. If that happens to be a mortally obese woman, then they should hire her. In this case it turned out that the most qualified and best fit for their group at the time were two people who happen to be of the male gender and a race that gives white skin color. So that's that.

All this outcry for explicitly hiring people with certain social or biological positions for the sake of having them in there is uncomfortable for me. I would never accept a job that was offered to me just because I'm not white and I share equal qualification with other applicants that are.

I would have happily accepted an awesome girl to be editor on GB's staff, but not at the cost of her not fitting in. Not at the cost of her not thinking with the group like minded. Not at the cost of her producing uninteresting content.

We can have Dan wear a wig, have him undergo surgery to become a woman and call him Danny. As long as he/she produces the content that is in line with what people want from the site and he/she fits in with the group and gives added value, it wouldn't matter to me. It is uncomfortable to me that it does matter to many of you. You think your cry for diversity is a positive one, but really, you're the one discriminating. As if it's impossible that two white males happen to be the best picks in this case. If you have any evidence to support that they picked them purely because they are male or white, then I'll take this more seriously. But as it stands you have no reason to think so.

Avatar image for spraynardtatum
spraynardtatum

4384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

I think people are out of their damn minds. Not everything is an issue!! We need to start calming the fuck down on accusing people of racism/sexism/homophobia by omission. Everything is going to be okay. We're all on the same team here. Team life!

As soon as Jeff joins the West Borough Baptist Church and Brad makes a new show where he just shouts racial slurs and derogatory statements towards women we should start discussing this stuff. Until then, walk on by.

Avatar image for nasar7
Nasar7

3236

Forum Posts

647

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Nasar7

I disagree with your argument inasmuch as you claim it would've been infeasible to find a qualified female or minority applicant. Hopefully this frees up a spot at GI for such a candidate.

Avatar image for droop
droop

1929

Forum Posts

710

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By droop

Guess I'll post it here then

No Caption Provided

#shotsfired

Guess she deleted the tweets again.

Avatar image for oldirtybearon
Oldirtybearon

5626

Forum Posts

86

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@droop: Is she still salty that she got drunk and made a complete ass out of herself on the Internet?

Avatar image for bwast
Bwast

1376

Forum Posts

95

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@excast said:

Honest talk here. Some of the most outspoken critics on Twitter have been folks like Samantha Allen, Eilizabeth Simins, and applicant Maddy Myers.

That's hilarious. Samantha wasn't hired so she's not being "allowed in the treehouse.". See, Giant Bomb are just meanie boys that don't want to play with me because I'm a yucky girl. And this place that I wanted a job at only days before is now a treehouse, a mere child's fascination, it's no big deal.

They (or the people they wanted to) didn't get a job so instead of accepting it like an adult, they blame institutional sexism as the reason why. "Goodbye, video games. Enjoy drowning in your own homogeneity."."The people in positions of privilege in this corner of the world have already decided how they want this thing to be. Game fucking over." (Samantha Allen, retweeted by Maddy Myers). I didn't get something I wanted. Why? Not the right person for the job? No, that would imply I'm not perfect! I know! Institutional sexism!

Eilizabeth Simins is even advocating people stop going to GB in protest. Why? They didn't hire who I wanted so no one should ever listen to them again. They were a perfectly fine video game website a few days ago but because they hired two straight white dudes we can't go there anymore."Giant Bomb killed a lot of hours at work but I'm through with them after this." (retweet) "currently RTing (mostly game) podcasts with women on them~" Switch that around. If someone went on Twitter advocating for the wholesale abandonment of Giantbomb because they hired a minority or a woman, the backlash would be inconceivable. She sounds like one of those "you can't be racist against white people, you can't be sexist against men" SJWs.

No one is stopping them or anyone from writing about video games. That would be discriminatory. They just don't do it for Giantbomb.

I understand that these women are in the minority of feminists and I'm sure there are plenty of writers/people in the industry who address gender and race without resorting to inflammatory garbage like this. But I loathe these professional victims with their hypocritical bigotry and smugness; and will take every opportunity to expose their shit for what it is: exploitation.

Avatar image for extomar
EXTomar

5047

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By EXTomar

@excast said:

@extomar said:

Did I miss the uprising and uproar about this? Who, besides the thread starter, are the people concerned about this? I thought people were glad they were filling up the San Fransisco office again.

A number of women involved in "games journalism" in some manner have gone out of their way to be rather critical of Giant Bomb both for their E3 panels and for the recent hiring process.

But who? I am not questioning there is criticism but I was following the E3 chatter and didn't find anything jumping out.

Do I think GB would be better off with women in the office? Heck yeah. Teams with diverse backgrounds and view points often come up with way more creative and entertaining content.

Do I think hiring two more white guys is a problem? Not really. The team needs to expand!

Avatar image for themangalist
themangalist

1870

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By themangalist
GIANTBOMB.COM, circa 2056
GIANTBOMB.COM, circa 2056

I don't think they should hire to meet a quota or to diversify for the sake of diversifying.

Basically this and what the OP said. I'm a dude on a couch who enjoy gags spout out by dudes on couches. We are the target audience for them.

People always say Giantbomb is a personality-based website, but to me what's more important is that it is a SMALL personality-based website. Everyone knows each other, that's why it works.

Avatar image for sergio
sergio

3663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

@droop said:

Guess I'll post it here then

No Caption Provided

#shotsfired

Guess she deleted the tweets again.

Thanks for saving them.

Avatar image for mikey87144
mikey87144

2114

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I can't believe this is an issue. Both Dan and Jason seem like great dudes. They have a great track record and can hit the ground running immediately. I wonder if the people bitching about the new hires are the same people who were giving Patrick a hard time until he found his footing? You can't win.

Oh by the way, for you people "fighting the good fight", nothing would annoy me more than to find out I was hired to fill some stupid diversity quota. It's insulting.

Avatar image for zevvion
Zevvion

5965

Forum Posts

1240

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

Edited By Zevvion

@droop said:

Guess I'll post it here then

No Caption Provided

#shotsfired

Guess she deleted the tweets again.

Isn't this just the dumbest reaction though? I would be very curious to know how many women actually applied. And then, how they'd compare to Dan Ryckert, which now that I looked it up, has a rather impressive amount of quality work to show for his skills.

Too little information to say for certain, but sounds like excuse-fishing because someone can't deal with being outclassed.

Avatar image for joshwent
joshwent

2897

Forum Posts

2987

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By joshwent

@droop: Is she still salty that she got drunk and made a complete ass out of herself on the Internet?

And has she forgotten that this place which is clearly not a "modern frontier" specifically sought her out as a guest on those E3 podcasts twice, 4 and 5 years ago? No, they probably just hate women.

Avatar image for dussck
Dussck

1066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By Dussck

@zevvion: Agreed. Hiring a black girl just because she is not a white guy would be some serious racism.